Skip to main content

Why do all brain models fail?



The brain is one system. And if we want to make the model of the system, we must know all parts of it. The problem with the brain models is that there are so many variables that researchers cannot make a fully working model. The fact is that brains are commonly similar to all people. 

But there are individual differences. And those differences make a suitable and working universal model of the brain impossible to create. 

Researchers can make universal models by interconnecting information from multiple brains. Those models are not working with single individuals. The reason for that is simple. 

The researchers created those models by interconnecting information from multiple brains. Those models are averages, their accuracy is not enough for individual cases. They can tell commonly about what the brain is.  But they cannot make any individual fitting to those models. 

We know that there are cells with axon connections. And neurotransmitters along with electricity that is making the brain. But the fact is that we don't know the exact roles of each cell and cell group in the brain. We know that neurons play the main role in the brain. But also other cell groups like immune cells communicate with neurons. 

The role of those cells in the thinking process is unknown. We know that also immune cells can make neurotransmitters. And they can follow the orders of the neurons. But how complicated is this interaction? We don't know what else information cells exchange in that process than the information about the condition of the immune cell. 

And another thing is that our entire nervous system can participate in the thinking process. The thing that remains a mystery is the role of neurons that locating outside the brain in this activity. 


Dreams are the biggest mystery in the human brain. 


Things like dreams are a mystery to us. Why we are spending half of our life sleeping? Why are dreams made like they are? The first question is why we cannot separate reality and dreams.  

Dreams are the reality for us when we are sleeping. And there is the possibility that if something can control our dreams, that thing can cause sleep paralysis that can even kill the person in fear. Or if the nightmares are repeating simultaneously that thing can make the person so tired that normal routines are impossible. 

In some theories, during history, the REM periods are formed for testing axons and neurons. In that model, REM periods are testing the connection and conditions of the neurons. There is the possibility that nightmares are alarm clocks. Their mission is to tell that everything is not right. The remarkable thing about nightmares is that sometimes people remember nightmares. 

But why cannot people remember good dreams? Why are nightmares dominating people? Is it possible that people don't need at least remember good dreams at all? 

The simultaneous repeating nightmares have a connection with serious nervous disorders. The níghtmares are also warning a person that something is not all right. And that thing means that dreams must have the mission to analyze observations that people are made during the daytime. 

There is the possibility that during deep-sleep is some kind of dream. But that thing is purely speculation. The thing is that REM-dream is only a short period in the sleep period. And the rest of the sleeping time must have some kind of purpose. 

During sleep, neurons are working with some kind of problems. But the problem is why we cannot remember those things. The reason why the REM period is a mystery is that this period seems to whip out something else from the cortex and consciousness. 


https://scitechdaily.com/predicting-the-behavior-and-health-of-individuals-why-do-brain-models-fail/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,