Does the universe expand faster than light?

The answer is yes and no. The material can travel outside our universe faster than it travels inside our universe. The reason for that is that there is no scattering effect and other kinds of electromagnetic quantum fields that can decrease the speed of material. So the speed of the two first photons released from the Big Bang is faster than photons inside the bubble called the universe.

Two forces are affecting the universe. The energy flow outside the universe causes the expansion of it. And the internal gravitation effect that is pulling particles to the center of the ball-shaped structure. We don't know the real geometrical shape of the universe. But because the Big Bang might look like erupting black hole. That thing causes suspicion that the shape of the universe is spherical.

The fact is that shape of the universe could also be flat or hyperbolic. And hyperbolic universe causes theory that during the Big Bang.

The form of material could be of an hourglass. The visible material would be in two hyperbolic-shaped forms in the ball-shaped structure. The other layer would be the universe where we live.

And another would be the anti-universe. Antimatter can form large objects. But its mirror material to material that forms our universe.

And the only thing is that object would detonate immediately when it touches the material. The universe would be two layers of visible material. There could be a dark matter between those layers.

The anti-universe would be similar to our universe. But its forms of antimatter. The idea of the hourglass-shaped structure is coming from the hourglass nebula.

Poles of the supernova caused the material to travel opposite ways. And that effect can be possible also in the erupting black hole. But there is a possibility. That mainly material released from the equator of the poles of the object that formed the universe.

Image 2) "The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space". (Wikipedia/Shape of the Universe)

If Ω > 1, this means gravitation wins. And the universe will end its existence in the big crunch. Otherwise, the end of the universe would be a "big emptiness". The problem with determining the shape of the universe is that we cannot see dark matter. And we cannot see the universe from outside.

This is one way to see things. When we think about the edge of the universe there is no quantum field outside it. That means the radiation pressure from inside the universe is the reason why the universe expands. Energy travels from the higher energy universe to emptiness. There are lower energy fields. And the energy flow is the thing that will destroy the universe someday.

Image 3) Hourglass nebula has caused an idea that maybe the universe is two balls or two hyperbolic layers.

When energy is traveling out from the universe it goes to the area where is nothing. The energy flow would be a monotonic wave movement outside the universe. There is the possibility that some kind of wall of wave movement would form the shockwave that travels in space. That shock wave formed in the Big Bang. And it travels at the front of the material.

So if there is some kind of particles that wall of wave movement would travel faster than light at the front of the universe. There is possibly an electromagnetic or quantum vacuum behind that wall. And energy travels to that small vacuum and pushes the shockwave ahead.

And that means the universe is actually in the giant WARP bubble. The things that are outside the universe are a mystery. There are possible other bubbles that are remainings of other big bangs. And other universes. But there is the possibility that those other universes are so distant that we cannot see them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

Image 3) Redditt

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog