Skip to main content

Could there be water on Mars?



The buried lake of Mars could just be layers of ice and rock. But maybe the astronauts can benefit from that ice. If that ice is water astronauts can use it simply by melting it. And if we are thinking about the Mars colony or Mars base, we must realize that it's safer for that colony that Mars has no living organisms. 

And then we must realize one thing. Water and life are not synonyms. Water doesn't automatically mean that there are alien lifeforms. And fossils of bacteria are not mean that there are some living creatures on that planet. And living bacteria don't mean that there are intelligent organisms. 

Well, the existence of water and liquid water are different things. There could be lots of water on Mars, but that water could be crystallized form in minerals like sulfates. It's possible to separate that water by warming those minerals. And sometimes pupils are making this kind of experiment in a chemistry course. But is there liquid water on Mars? That is a different thing. 

Today planet Mars is a very cold place. There is only weak volcanic activity. There is could be carbon dioxide ice under the surface. And if there is some kind of extra energy in those carbon dioxide ice pockets that can cause carbon dioxide vaporization. 

Also, giant dust storms are traveling across the desert. So there is a possibility that some kind of meteor impact or friction in sandstorms can rise the temperature in some places and form something liquid. But is that liquid thing some kind of carbon dioxide?  

Because of low pressure in the atmosphere, there is vaporized water in Mars' atmosphere. There is the possibility that there was some kind of life forms. But that doesn't mean the bacteria are living. There is the possibility that those bacteria are stoned or turned into fossils that involve things like methane gas. 

Methane gas found on Red Planet. There is suspicion that microscopic bacteria formed that. That doesn't mean that there are active bacteria on Mars. Even if bacteria formed that methane, it could be stored in the mineral pockets or the bacteria fossils millions of years ago. 

So maybe that methane is the remnant of the lost lifeforms. Maybe that methane was stored in bacteria millions of years ago. And those fossils kept that gas inside them until NASA's probes released that gas. 

In history, the planet Mars was a suitable place for the birth of life. But then its climate changed. That planet lost its entire lithosphere at least twice. And some asteroid impact changed its trajectory. The question is how far has life advanced on that planet? 

There is suspicion that there was some kind of bacteria on that planet before its climate changed. It's possible, that researchers can find remnants of those ancient bacteria. 

But if there are remnants of those bacteria only in a few places on the surface. That tells that some kind of meteorites brought those lifeforms to the Red Planet. When we see Mars in modern images we see the remnants of ancient rivers and seas. But where that water that created those ancient rivers was gone? 

Of course, the UV radiation from the sun can destroy water molecules. But there is no UV radiation in all places on Mars. Those ancient rivers formed after the last big catastrophe. That means Mars already lost lots of its mass and maybe its magnetic field turned weak. And there was still water in a short period after the last big impact. Was something vaporized in that water after the last big impact? 

Was some kind of radiation impact vaporized water? Was Mars hit by FRB (Fast Radio Burst) that raised the planet's temperature? Or could the UV radiation be so powerful that it broke all water molecules on that planet? 

The question is where has the water gone? And why that thing that vaporized water didn't destroy those ancient riverbeds? 

What raised the temperature on the entire planet without harming the geological structures of ancient rivers? If that thing was some kind of meteorite. Ancient riverbed geological structures should be destroyed during that impact. So, could there be some kind of meteorite rain? In that version, the small ice bites of carbon dioxide or methane ice impacted the atmosphere of the Red Planet. And that raised the temperature that vaporized water. 


https://scitechdaily.com/signs-of-water-on-mars-might-actually-be-an-indication-of-something-else/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars


Image: https://scitechdaily.com/signs-of-water-on-mars-might-actually-be-an-indication-of-something-else/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,