Skip to main content

Radical theology and other thinking about the modern religion



Kimmo Huosionmaa

Yesterday I had a day when I thought about religion and what kind creature the God might be. And this writing continues the same line. In the modern world, we have right to write and think also theological question freely, and we also can say, that maybe the God is a creature from the cosmos, what was existed before "Big Bang". There are many things in Holy Bible, what are meant for salvation. And one version of salvation is when some older man loses argumentation against the younger person or doesn't know the answer to some questions, like "why we are on the Earth", what children normally ask, can this patriarch say, that "In the Holy Bible reads, that everything was created by the God".


The thing what disturbs about the Religion is that there is always some other person, who tells us how we must believe. If we are talking about self-cutting and ripping and harming ourselves or other people in the name of religion, we are talking about sickness and disturbed behavior. They are things that must be reported to police and psychiatrists. That kind of behavior is a sign of personal problems, and they must investigate by trained medical personnel, not by some "Holy man".  So Holy Bible doesn't replace medicals and vaccines, and this is the thing what everybody must realize.



What means that Jesus is the salvation? One answer would be that some patriarchs can say that “Jesus said that". This might be true. But what means “release us from evil"? This might explain by using the words “Jesus have told us, that we must make other people the Christians without care of methodology". In this text would be things, what could be the little bit too revolutionary for accepting by the Christian theologists.


When we are thinking about the God and what is the God, we can make the theory about who is this person. In this theory, we can connect the “Big Bang"-theory and theology. In this theory, there was universe before our Universe. And it would collapse like in “Great crash"-theory. In this very radical think the God was an alien, who left outside the “Big crash".


And in this cosmos theological thinking the “Big Bang" happens just after “Big crash". This alien was outside the influence-area of this “Big bang", and that was giving that thing the very great advantage for another species. That theory could make the explanation for god. This alien could have billions of years advantage for another species.


In this thinking process, the advanced civilization could modify their bodies by using nanotechnology. That technology allows those creatures to change their shape anytime when they want. In this theory, the body of those aliens would be the concentration of nanomachines, and that technology would give the possibility that this alien could be like the amoeba, what changes the shape anytime as this alien wants. Or maybe those aliens have portable protective shield generator.




The term “Aquarius" might mean the man or organism, what can change the shape of the body. This alien would be the very flexible organism, and it might mean that it would be like some liquid metal robot from the movie Terminator. The “Aquarius" would transfer it body like glass, and that would make it very hard to locate. But this writing shows again a little bit too materialistic morale and ethics. I know that there will be some persons, who will not like this writing, but this is the text, what could the God be nothing more or less.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/radical-theology-and-other-thinking.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,