Skip to main content

What do you think about reality?



In the past, reality just was. Term reality meant the observations that our senses sent to us. And we believed that reality was stable. And it was the same for everyone. Then we realized the differences in our senses like color blindness. But also, differences in our experiences adjust the way we see things. Things like feelings are modifying our way to see reality. And that thing means that reality is not stable or static for all of us. 

Things like feelings are ordering who we are feeling certain things. Feelings are subjective things. The experiences are making something very funny, and positive things to somebody. But then another person can feel the same thing very negatively. 

When somebody feels falling in love is a very positive thing. There is one person who might feel that thing very negatively. And that is the ex-lover of our new honey. 

In the past researchers thought that somebody just fell in love. But modern neural scientists are researching what kind of effect causes that thing. Why some people just fell in love? Or why do some people buy things, that they don't even need? What is the neuro-effect behind the things that something that person sees turns so attractive that the person cannot resist it?  

One example of that case is a customer who goes to a shop and buys something very expensive products. That the person uses only once. But that thing is only "need to get" and there goes lots of money. And why do some people go to a slot machine and then put their entire salary into that machine? Why do they think? That they will get a very good profit from that machine? 

Modern science tries to find the neural and neurochemical background for some behavior. And the most interesting question is, what launched that effect? There was some kind of sense, and then the neural chemicals started the interaction, which was against all logic and nonsense in many ways. 

Memories that are connected to senses are making feelings. So in that way, thinking of reality is always a subjective experience. 

In the past, people who worked with neural interactions said that people are interested in things. That thing means that interest was enough. And the effect that caused interest came outside the object. So that means everything that people see is real. But is it like this? We can say that things like holograms are causing questions about reality. But is a hologram only a virtual thing? Before we touch hologram we cannot say. Is hologram real or not? 

Holograms are forming a new version of reality or existence. 

That thing is virtual existence or virtual reality. Hologram-capable projectors can project houses to fog.  


Holograms can form a collective virtual effect. 


The VR glasses and other VR stuff are forming subjective experiences. But holograms are forming collective experience. 

Otherwise, developers can make holograms by using infrared frequency. And if that infrared radiation might have a high energy level. So that means the hologram can burn things that are touching it. 

So we can think that holograms are forming a thing that we can call "sliding reality". The hologram could be virtual reality. But it can slide to the interacting state of the objects. And one version of reality is the interaction between objects. 

Theoretically, we could raise the energy level and number of photons in the hologram so much that it transforms real kinetic objects. The idea is that the high-power energy just turns the photons into their waveforms where they are free superstrings. And then those pieces of wave motion turn to quarks and hadrons. So theoretically is possible to transform holograms into real objects by manipulating the wave motion. And transform that wave motion to the kinetic object. 


This is one version of reality. And maybe we can say that reality always exists. Even if we cannot see it. 


When we think about things, like the Internet. Those things are the worst tools in the wrong hands. But who is the worst selector in the world? We are the people who are using the worst censorship in the world. The target of that censorship is we. We don't want to hear people. Whose opinions are different than our opinions. So we just close those people away from our social network. 

Things like Facebook and some other social media networks made lots of work that the users feel good. They must always have fun. And "fun" means that all different people who have no similar background or opinions as we have are closed away from our social network. The false world is the place where are only nice and cool people. Everything that is shared is positive. But in the real world, there are also many negative things. We cannot just love and feel nice. 

There are also bad days. And we must also handle negative feelings and thoughts. We must realize that if we close some "not cool" people away from our social network that would not turn that person not existed. That person still exists. And maybe that user tries on the social network by using a fake identity. Some people are curious characters. And they are sneaking around to find out what other people will write and read about them. 

The reason for that censorship is the attitude, that we must not hear anything else than things that are pleasing to our opinions. 

If somebody has opinions, about what we don't like, we just close them away. We have the right to do that thing. The reason for that is that we must only hear things that please us. 

The Internet is the best information deliverer in the world. But then we must realize that internet is the best place to get the one side information. People are choosing similar people as they are in their social network. And that means people hear only opinions. That supports their opinions and attitudes. People see only things that please them.


https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,