Skip to main content

Did modern cosmology find God?


There is made many models of what God might be. Could God be an alien? Could God be Creature that came once from another solar system? Or is God some kind of China Brain? The collective mind of some great group of individuals?

Please help me! These kinds of questions are interesting. But also very hard to answer. The thing is that before we can say that we found God or we didn't find god is a very interesting thing. But before we answer those questions, we must describe what we mean about God?

 If we don't want to use Holy Bible or use some other words that we can find from holy manuscripts we might say that God is, far more intelligent and technically advanced creature than we are. So we are making many models of what God might be. And the answer is that God might be some alien that came from another solar system. 


The thing is that nobody knows what that character is. The fact is that the so-called alien hypothesis is one of the most usual acceptable things. 


But then we might think that the alien is intelligent and capable to make decisions. And at this moment we realize that the alien could be far different than we are. Even that creature thinks that thing doesn't mean that the alien is like us. It might be the singularity of technology and biological creatures. Maybe that creature has the chance to reach the level of God. And in some wildest theories, God is the creature that could remain from the past universe. 

In some theories, God is a remnant from the past universe. The remnant of the last civilizations of the universe before us. The model for that theorem is created by using the observations of the possible past universes made by Sir Roger Penrose. In some models, the giant Dyson's sphere would surround the black hole that is causing time dilation. That Dyson's Sphere would be the giant quantum-nerve computer whose intelligence level would be enormous. 


The China brain model that introduced in the book "Naked Sun" written by Isaac Asimov.


What if the entire human population would connect to the database and network as one entirety? That kind of technical singularity where all individuals can form one entirety. In China Brain model the individual organisms are like cells of one entirety. And the cells that are inside that creature are the subcells. 

The entirety could live forever even if one of its individuals dies. Actually in this kind of singularity between computers and living organisms the generations will change normally. But the data like memories of the individuals will download to the databases. There each of the entirety could have access to that data. 

In one of the most interesting theories, there would be the alien population. Which intelligence and consciousness would form one entirety. That means that the entire population is linked to one entirety by using the microchips that are implanted in their brain tissue. 

In that kind of version, the entirety lives forever even a couple of its members would die. In that case, the interstellar spacecraft can carry the alien population of millenniums. The entirety remains. But the generations of the individuals would change. And that means the collective consciousness would make that those creatures can travel between stars. 

In both of those models, the entirety would use robots as their assistants. So if those hypothetical creatures use superpositioned and entangled particles to control robots. That means they would not need hyperdrives for interstellar travel. Those creatures could launch interstellar probes and then continue their everyday life. And when the craft is at the goal they can begin the mission. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/modern-cosmology-god/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain


https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,