Skip to main content

How to teach social skills to robots and AI?



One of the versions is to make a large-scale database structure where is different versions of words are used in social situations. Then the programmer makes the first connections between databases. After that, the system starts to talk with its creators. 

The thing is teaching social skills for AI is quite an easy thing in theory. It's just connecting databases. But social skills are more than just saying words. They are noticing the facial expressions taking the hat off when going to the church. And other kinds of things.  

But if we want to make the AI what discusses like a real person that requires a lot of databases and connections between them. If the system would make the job interviews that thing requires lots of data. And if somebody says or asks about things that are not in the database, the system might ask the programmer to answer by talking or writing it to the computer. 

The thing is that if we want that AI to talk with us about everyday situations. That thing is really hard to make. The thing is that we don't normally recognize. That people are not using written standard language in everyday speech. So that requires that the databases can understand dialects. If we want to make an AI that has a very large set of skills. That requires large-scale databases. 

The problem with regular computer programs is that they are not using fuzzy logic. In the discussion programs, the fuzzy logic is made by using multiple databases that are connected with a certain social dialogue. Those databases are involving dialect words. 

They are connected to databases there is written standard language. And then those things are connected to the database that is including social dialogue. The thing is that the programmer can write social dialogue by using dialect words. And that makes the robot more like a human. 

If the social behavior like words that the AI uses are right the programmer or teacher would accept or deny that thing. If there is no match for an answer the programmer would write the right answer for the machine. 

The idea is that when the person is discussing with AI. It would record the things that the opponent is saying, and then answer. This kind of AI might have other parameters like images of the things facial expressions in certain situations. The AI is the ultimate tool in cases like job interviews and especially in video interviews. 

The system can follow things like the length of the brakes between the words. And how the voice is chancing when the person is talking. But it can also look for things like touching the nose during the interview. What kinds of things are marks of lies. That kind of system would also pick things like does the interviewed person has some kind of skills what the interviewer wants to find. 

When the interviewer asks about things like computer skills and what to do in certain situations the job seeker would cover the missing skills in long answers. That means that the interviewer would not notice that there are missing parts in the skills that the computer operator requires. 

 Like how to connect systems to the net. Or something like that. The system might record the answer. And then compare the answer with the actions what the worker should do in those cases. If there is no match, the person would not understand what to make. 

In the cases like job interviews, the AI can search if there are lots of the same names in the lists of referees in different job applications. If the same referees are always in the CV:s of the persons whose work is not. There is something wrong with those referees. 

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,