The shape of the universe. And the dark energy interaction.

The universe might be the giant loop. But when we are thinking about the shape of the universe. We should remember a couple of things. The universe is a giant entirety, and we see only a couple of percent about that thing. There is a possibility that the universe is like a plate. Or it can be like a ball. Or it can be like a saddle.

But is the universe shape and structure even homogenous? That means in the giant entirety could be many types of forms. There is the possibility that there are cosmic bubbles of the yet-seen material. And in some other ideas, the universe is warped.

That means the shape of the main material is some of those three examples that are introduced in image II. But there is the possibility that the main shape hides sub-shapes. The layer of the universe might be waved. Or there might be bubble- or ball-shaped structures in the main structures.

The empty bubbles in the universe are interesting things. Because there is a lower density of material than other places in the universe. Dark matter is similar material with visible material but we just cannot see that thing. We always forget that interaction is two-way.

The same effect would interact also with the other side. And that means the material that is visible to us has similar interaction to the dark matter as the dark matter has to visible material.

If there is a creature in the universe that is formed of dark matter. The universe that is formed of visible material to us would seem empty bubble to that creature.

But if we are thinking otherwise we might think that some creature lives in the universe that is formed of dark matter. That creature would not see us either. The thing that makes material dar is that the particles that form the dark matter would have different sizes. And that means we cannot see that material because it sends the radiation with a different wavelength than visible material.

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

"The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1.

From top to bottom: a spherical or ball-shaped universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic "saddle-shaped" universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space".

If Ω = 1, the universe is flat.

If Ω > 1, there is positive curvature.

If Ω < 1 there is negative curvature.

(Wikipedia, Shape of the universe)

The reason why the shape of the universe is important is that if the Ω > 1. That means the universe would end its day in the big crash. The entire material would drop in the black hole. And in space where is no wave movement or material, the black hole will detonate.

And that thing makes that the universe would be like the Phoenix bird. That thing makes the new Big Bang possible. But the wave-particle duality means that the crossing wave movement can create new elementary particles. The researchers of the SETI program introduced the theory that God is a remnant from the past universe. The interesting thing is that Sir Roger Penrose and his team recognized. That some black holes are sending radiation that source might be in the past universe.

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

The thing is that the bubble of the visible material is the ball. But there is a lot of material in the universe that is invisible to us. And there is lots of material and energy that are hard to observe. The things like free quarks, neutrinos, just discovered odderon particles. And cosmic radio frequential hum which cannot observe from the earth because it cannot penetrate in the plasma field of the sun is giving a tip, what the dark energy might be.

Dark energy might be the radiation that source is in the extremely small particles. Or it is just the radio waves that cannot reach us. If the source of the electromagnetic radiation is in the odderon particles or anyons which are 2-dimensional particles that will explain why we cannot see that energy.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-voyager-1-detects-hum-interstellar-space-2021-5?r=US&IR=T

https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/there-was-a-universe-before-ours-says-nobel-laureate-roger-penrose-report-900067.html

https://futurism.com/sir-roger-penrose-alternate-theory-of-the-big-bang-2

https://scitechdaily.com/after-50-year-international-hunt-physicists-discover-mythical-odderon-particle/

https://www.space.com/universe-may-be-curved.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog