Skip to main content

The existence of tetraneutron is proven in the test.

  

 The existence of tetraneutron is proven in the test. 



"In the tandem Van de Graaff accelerator of the Maier-Leibnitz laboratory on the Garching research campus. A lithium-7 target has been bombarded with lithium-7 atomic nuclei. Those nuclei accelerated to around twelve percent of the speed of light. All measurement results indicate that carbon-10 and the sought-after tetra-neutron were formed. – Schematic representation of the nuclear reaction."

(https://www.chemeurope.com/en/news/1173903/the-tetra-neutron.html)

Tetraneutrons are groups of four neutrons. So could there be also tetra protons and tetra electrons? The groups of particles there is not antimatter. And how long do those particles stay in the form? If they exist.  In positronium electron and positron and protonium proton and antiproton. 

In those structures, the antimatter particle or mirror particle will keep the material particle orbiting each other. Could it be possible to make similar structures only by using protons and electrons in structures that are forming only electrons or protons?

Tetraneutron or hypothetical four neutron group is the element number "0". The tetraneutron would be the "neutron crystal" and the trivial name for that thing is neutronium. There is suspicion that neutronium existed in the neutron stars. 

The test has proven the existence of that strange element number "0" or neutronium. There are also other types of exotic materials or "elements". The name of those very interesting "pseudo-elements " protonium. In that synthetic element proton orbits antiproton. And that's why the name of the protonium is antiprotonic hydrogen. In positronium, the electron and positron are orbiting each other. 

Neutronium is the only of those elements that contain only material. But if there is possible to form the tetraneutron type structures by using only protons and electrons without antimatter.  That thing will bring a new state of matter. The names of those hypothetical proton and electron groups could be tetra protons and tetra electrons. 

And there are made calculations that tetraneutron can stay stable for about seven minutes. That means tetraneutron is a quite long existent element if we compare that thing with the Higgs boson or some super heavy elements which half time is less than second. 

Tetraneutron has given an idea of one of the most interesting visions about the state of matter. In that state of matter, the tetraneutrons are replacing neutrons. If there are similar hypothetical groups of protons called "tetra protons" like tetraneutrons. That thing can make it possible to make the new fundamental state of matter. In that hypothetical "tetra state" of matter, the protons and neutrons are in the form of groups in the nucleus. 

And the electron groups are in the places where normal electrons are orbiting the nucleus. That thing means that this state of matter can have a similar number of tetraneutrons and tetra protons with electron groups as the regular atoms have single neutrons and protons. 

Those kinds of theoretical atoms are interesting things. But the fact is that the tetra neutrons are interesting tools. They can use as miniature gramophone stylus in the tunneling microscopes. But the problem is that neutrons are harder to produce than protons and electrons. That means benefiting this thing requires nuclear reactors. 


https://www.chemeurope.com/en/news/1173903/the-tetra-neutron.html


https://www.techexplorist.com/tetraneutron-experiment-offers-evidence-long-sought-particle-comprising-four-neutrons/43130/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronium


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonium


https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,