Skip to main content

Big Bang and beyond.

 Big Bang and beyond.



So what kind of case the Big Bang was? Was it the release of the subatomic particles from the erupting black hole? In that scenario, energy started to flow away from that Black Hole because it was higher energetic than its environment. 

And energy is flowing to the lower energy areas. The question is: did the Big Bang release material to the universe. Did it turn the existing material into another? And which way did energy flow travel if that thing happened? 

The thing is that energy is always traveling to the lower energetic areas. So the energy balance between the matter and the environment determines which way energy flows. 

If the environment is lower energetic than material energy travels from the material to the environment. And if the material is lower energetic than its environment energy travels to the material. Energy flow continues until the energy levels between particles. The environment is the same. 

Another thing could be that the Big Bang was the energy eruption that pumped energy to the particles that were already existed in the universe. In that case, the energy load from the Big Bang simply turned some particles of dark matter into matter that has formed, as we know it.

The thing is that if we would be formed of dark matter. We would see an empty bubble in the point of our universe. The thing is that we don't know which thing was the Big Bang, except it released the material in the universe. But was it released material or just changed the type of particles to another. 

So there is the third version of the Big Bang theory. And that is that. The energy level of the material that existed near the epicenter of the Big Bang loosed energy. That means the Big Bang formed the empty bubble in the universe. If the big bang released energy flow that pushed the universe empty. That thing could cause that the matter near that bubble lost its energy. 

And then part of the energy of the dark matter traveled in that bubble. Then that thing caused that the energy level of those particles decreased, and the size of those particles changed. That thing could explain. The reason why the form of visible material of the universe looks like a ball. 

What if we would live in a young universe? How long it would take to travel across the universe? The thing is that. If we would live in the young universe there be more scattering and quantum fields so the speed of light would be lower than in the modern universe. Another thing is that the size of particles would be different. And that means there is the possibility that travel across the young and smaller universe takes as long as it takes today. 

The thing is that the energy level of the young universe is higher than the universe that we are seeing. Another thing is that there was more crossing radiation and the material is releasing energy slower the level of single particles than it does now. But the universe itself as an entirety transmitted energy faster outside it than it does today. Today the temperature of the universe is three kelvin. 

And the cosmic background is one of the reasons why the universe is expanding. When the edge of the universe is traveling outside the energy level of the universe is turning lower. That expansion causes that it's not possible to get the energy stability between material and its environment as long the expansion continues. The energy flow from material to the environment is the thing that causes the end of the universe. But if the universe starts to come down its energy level starts to rise. 

And sooner or later the energy is starting to flow back to particles. The thing that determines the direction of the energy flow is the energy level. Energy always travels to low energetic areas as I wrote earlier?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,