Why is the color of the skin mentioned only when criminal is black?

http://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/why-is-color-of-skin-mentioned-only.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When some police organization works with racialist methods, that would mean that every time, when the officer of the law uses the personal check for racist reasons, the time of law enforcement would spend in unnecessary work. Also, racism and ethnically profiled person means, that officers would get the predictive attitude, that the major ethnical group, what is controlling politics of the nation would not make any crimes. When we are talking about making an ethnic profile, we must same time ask one question: does that mean the personal check for fun? Or does it have some other mean? When police would go to person and ask id papers because the color of the skin, that would be ethnic profile, the hat is known as racism.


When we are talking about the crimes, what are made by black persons, we might think the Hollywood movies, where black gangs are controlling some neighborhood and sell crack to kids. And this means that the attitude of law enforcement would be, that color of the skin makes people criminals. There is any way to make algorithms for handling criminals, but the ethical profile is not the very effective version of that. Of course, the active member of Muslim community, who would be open radical is the potential terrorist, but also the white skinhead can make terror-attacks, like McVeigh the bomber of Oklahoma made.


McVeigh was white criminal, who attacked office building with bombs. And somebody has claimed that his action and same way some school shootings were blocked if those people were black. But the racism has caused that the officers would not take white treaters seriously, because they are all the time busy while they are checking black person's identities. And during this kind of operations, some white guys would give open threats to society, but they are not taken seriously, because the attitudes are that white persons even cannot make any crimes.


And here we must ask one question: could somebody suspected that everything was not all right if the black person would carry the boxes full of firearms to some hotel room in Las Vegas? When are we talking about racism, why the color of the skin doesn't mention in the cases, where mass shooters or some kind of that criminals are white?


Why always are blacks mentioned, when they make something by the color of the skin? This means that every kind of militarism and radicalism are the danger for national security, and the anger talks and writings about armed violence against some social or ethnical groups are marked for violent behavior. Also supporting the criminal organizations and boosting threats with pictures of weapons are the mark of violent behavior. Police forces mission is to protect the citizens and co-operate with citizens for targeting the criminal organizations, not scatter the society.


The scattering makes possible that some radical organizations would recruit the new members in their lines. And that's why racism is an intolerable way to make official work. If some ethnical group would be targeted with racist actions of the officials, that would make them easy targets for the radical group's recruiters. That is one reason, why racism is not the very good way to make police work.

https://futurism.com/lapd-documents-show-their-policing-algorithms-continue-to-target-minorities-and-past-offenders/

http://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/why-is-color-of-skin-mentioned-only.html