Skip to main content

China and Russia might able to shoot down every JSTAR-aircraft in a day



E-8 Joint STAR
(Picture I)
http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/china-and-russia-might-able-to-shoot.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The United States Air Force has faced the thing, that it's combat support aircraft like JSTAR radar aircraft are in danger, if the war begins. In here I must see one thing, what has been forgotten by those writers, who think that JSTAR has problems to accomplish their missions. Pentagon has seen those aircraft, and they also know the capacities and threats of that big four-engine aircraft, and here I must ask one question: is JSTAR actually meant to use in full-scale conflict? Some recon and intelligence platforms are operating in peacetime, but as we know that they would not the ability to survive in real war.


The same way we can say that AC-130 gunships would shoot down in the real war, where highly sophisticated forces would operate against U.S military. JSTAR is actually a radar platform, what mission is to locate underground bunkers and vehicles from the ground. The primary role for JSTAR is actually locating the vehicles by using radar, what it is quite difficult, and that system needs powerful computers to handle the data, what is collected by that radar system. In that case, the buildings, hills and other uneven parts of the ground are disturbing the radar, and hide those targets from the JSTAR-system.  JSTAR would also communicate with drones and other sensors, what are delivered to that combat area, and locate the enemies by those subsystems like Boeing Dominator or its successors.


Here I must say that those radars can also installed in any aircraft in the world, what means that B-2 or B-52 might have similar radars, what can locate enemy command bunkers. But as we might see, those four engine aircraft like JSTAR and it Russian opponent IL-18 "Coot A", are normally operate with fighter escort, and in the real world we could see that B-52 or Tu-95 "Bear" class nuclear bombers could be shot down very easily. And of course E-3 "Sentry's" and other radar surveillance platforms are good targets for anti-radiation missiles, but those platforms are used. As we know that there are always secrets, that are not told to normal people.


And somebody believes, that many of those four engine platforms are equipped with ADS (Active Denial System), what is similar to that used in tanks. That system is actually high-power microwave transmitter, what would be targeted to the incoming missiles, and the similar system is quite effective against the aircraft, what is making gun-attack against those four engine multi-mission platforms. There are rumors that next-generation Su-27 fighters have laser weapons because it would expand their strike capacity. Those microwave transmitters are targeting incoming missiles by using their infrared signature for aiming the transmitter to the target.


In some theories, those microwave transmitters can be very dangerous also for aircraft, what are using laser-weapons. The sensor detects the heat, what comes from combat aircraft laser weapons, and then targets microwave or laser ray to that plane. There is a chance to survive, if the user of active denial system has got more powerful microwaves or lasers in use, than attacking aircraft. But that is only the speculation about that kind of things.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_E-8_Joint_STARS

Boeing Dominator: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d1ORgVjZto

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/05/18/air-force-secretary-china-russia-could-shoot-down-new-jstars-on-day-one-of-a-war/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ebb%2021.05.18&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Early%20Bird%20Brief


Picture I

http://www.janes.com/images/assets/490/73490/p0563236-main.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/china-and-russia-might-able-to-shoot.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,