Skip to main content

Why companies hire independent thinkers, who are forced on the same mold with others?





Kimmo Huosionmaa

When somebody hires thinker, we normally believe that company wants new thoughts, but we forget one very important thing in the recruiting process. When some person is hired, the company owns the opinions of that hired person. And sometimes I have thought, that may be the reason for hiring independent thinkers is, that they might want to buy from public employee markets, and sometimes the reason for hire those persons might be close their mouth with confidentiality contracts, what denies to share information in public media.


Also hiring those persons might be meant for signal, that if somebody is the good boy and keep mouth shut and be like other persons, would that person make millions by following the leaders, and why that person must do anything else than money in the working life.  If the company has made millions by using some traditional method, why it must renew its methodology? In many recruiting notes are mentioned, that in the corporation would be hired the person, who has the capacity to think independently about things.


But when that person is hired, the company expects that person transfer to use the traditional methods. And sometimes that would feel very strange for some persons. And this is the very big problem in the academical work field. Sometimes I have thought that some of those companies are using those persons in their marketing data. Maybe that sounds good, that in those companies works many academical workers, and that would give the boost for marketing their products. And sometimes I have thought that some of those companies or organizations are trying to show, that their methods if working are better than universities.


They use this thing that some Ph. D is changed to use their methods for selling their way to operate. And in the business life, things are that what is right or wrong for companies depend on the opinion of the leaders of some company. This means, that if somebody is against the leaders of the methodology, what is chosen by the leaders of the company, would that henchman allowed to look for the new workplace. The culture in some companies is very old-fashion, and some of them are giving the training for some technologies like programming languages.


And those probably private sector actors are competitors for public sector actors like universities, what are giving also training for programming languages in their open universities. If some person chooses those open universities for their education, that would be off the private sector actors. But I think that the main purpose of hiring independent thinkers, what are forced to the same model as everybody else might be that those people want to silent. And that, of course, protects the persons, who make wrong decisions.


The keeping mouth shut would help the person to become the member of the elite leader's team, and of course, that elite would be protected by making high-school education paid because that would keep idealists and other persons out from the highest places in the companies. And who cares about pollution and another kind of things, because we all have limited time to live, and what happens after one hundred years has nothing to do with us, but our grandchildren and their children might have different opinions of that.

Sources:

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10181675

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,