Skip to main content

Are billionaires genius?


Do you know Gladstone Gander in Donald Duck cartoons? That character is the luckiest person in the duck universe. But being lucky doesn't mean that person is intelligent. Every man or woman, in the world can win ten million from the lottery. And that makes them rich, and beautiful. But at the same time, those people are lucky. Lucky people can win lots of money, but they are not intelligent. Being lucky means that a person simply picks the right lot from the kiosk. 

Of course, some mathematically talented people can calculate the possibility that opponent players have better cards than they have. But those people cannot always win in poker or the lottery. 



Many people believe in the theory that rich people are intelligent and geniuses. Sometimes we think that the thing behind that myth is that we want to be polite. Many times rich people have big ownership. And they have a superior role in the working life. And that's why we want to be polite to those people. 

I think nobody wants to argue with people who have a good relationship in working life. If a person knows many headhunters or company leaders. The fight with those people can have a negative influence on careers.

When we think about the way how people earn their money, we can call a person who wins 10 million euros from the lottery a millionaire. But is that person a genius, or is that person just lucky? In the same way, we can ask ourselves about people who make many successful businesses is that person a good businessman? What does a good businessman mean? Is a good businessman person who is good at making trade? Or is that person the only person, who has the right relationships? 

That means our business genius knows lots of people. Who buy certain types of services or products. So a person has the right social network that makes any person in the world a good businessman. But does a good social network mean that a person is intelligent? No, it means, that some buyers say that person is funny or good company. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,