Researchers at MIT developed an AI that can predict human behavior. (Can this mean that we turn Isaac Asimov's psychohistory into reality? )

Can this mean that we turn Isaac Asimov's psychohistory into reality?

The idea is similar to the mathematical psychohistory that novelist Isaac Asimov created for his fictional "Foundation" novel series. The idea is that the computer can predict people's behavior by benefiting Boltzmann's natural gas formulas created by Ludwig Boltzmann.

If we connect MIT's AI model to the systems that handle things like oil molecule behavior in that model the humans would be molecules for the system. And the system must only know which part of people acts following the same rules.

So if the AI can predict some person's behavior, it can predict the entire nation's behavior. The system must just make the data matrix of all individuals. And then see how most of the people will behave. The system is simple, but it requires lots of information.

The idea is to use the statistics about the behavior of the people. Then the system can use those statistics. Or databases to calculate the behavior of most of the people. The system must know what kinds of emotional activity activates certain behaviors. Researchers created the world's first emotion detectors that a person can wear. This allows to creation of the behavioral matrix for the AI. That thing allows the system to see the person's emotions. Then the surveillance cameras can connect certain movements or other behaviors with the emotions. That means the AI can see what is someone's mood from camera images.

The AI can predict human behavior. If it gets enough data for that thing. The AI can create the data matrix of every person in the country. And then if we want to make the psychohistory for the USA. We must just make about 334,914,895 (U.S. Population) data matrices or behavioral matrices. And then the system can predict. That is what most people will do during some cases like elections.

By using data that different systems collect the AI can make a digital twin of the person. And then the system can predict everything that we do. The system must just follow our behavior and rituals, which we don't even know, and then the system can predict what we do after that ritual. Which can be things like looking at a watch in a certain way.

Those rituals are small but the AI can make the matrix and use it to predict what individuals will make. The AI can make digital twins for every person in the country, and then it can simply predict how most people behave in certain situations. And then it must just calculate which part of the people will do something.

https://scitechdaily.com/mits-new-ai-model-predicts-human-behavior-with-uncanny-accuracy/

https://scitechdaily.com/worlds-first-real-time-wearable-human-emotion-recognition-technology-unveiled/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann

Comments

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog