Skip to main content

Energy rips "W" boson to pieces. So could some yet unknown boson be the source of the Dark Energy?



"W"-boson


The shape of the "W" boson is like the "X"-letter. When the end of the aisle of the "W" boson hits energy or wave movement it starts to flow in both directions. To the middle and outside the "W" boson. The core of the "W" boson channels energy to the center of the boson. And then the energy starts to flow back to the aisle of the "X"-shaped structure. When energy hits to "W" boson it affects to entire boson. 

And part of it would tunnel itself into the aisle. That tunneled energy flow will increase the level of the energy of the wave movement that travels back to the end of the aisle. The wave movement is pushing the most out parts of the boson outside. And finally, the boson is ripping into pieces. That thing releases energy that is stored in the boson. 

The wave movement always travels from the area that is the highest energy level to lower energy level areas. And that causes the thing that energy is connecting the wave movement to the "W" boson. And the same energy rips it to pieces. And that brings interesting things to my mind. 

That thing is could the dark energy form in some kind of boson? When energy travels in the "W" and "Z" bosons. They also send radiation or wave movement that oscillates other "W" bosons. Those bosons are gauge bosons, which spin is 1. 




Image 2) Standard model


Why leptons cannot form similar structures as quarks?


The reason why bosons cannot create similar connections with quarks is that their spin is 1. That means that gluons cannot touch those particles. The spin of quarks is 1/2. And that can be the reason why quarks can from protons or neutrons. The spin of the electrons, muons, and gluons is also 1/2. And the question is why they cannot form similar structures with quarks? 

The reason for that can be in those particles' electric charge. There is the possibility that the electromagnetic charge will be stronger than the gluon-interaction called strong interaction or strong nuclear force. The reason for that is that the effect of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary particles affects longer distances than strong interaction. The strong interaction is the interaction between quark and gluon. And strong interaction ties quarks to structures like protons and neutrons. 

So the electromagnetic interaction with the same polar elementary particles pushes particles away from each other before the gluonic interaction or strong interaction can begin. And the reason why quark can form structures like protons and neutrons is that its electric charge is so weak. 

The quark's weak electric charge causes the gluon can jump between quarks before the electromagnetic interaction can affect those particles. The transporter particle of quantum electromagnetism or quantum electrodynamics is a photon. Quantum electrodynamics is the electromagnetic effect between elementary particles. 

The electric charge of leptons is 1 or -1. The electric charge of quark is 2/3e or -1/3e. So the electric charge of electrons and other leptons will push those particles away from each other. 




Image 3: Formulas of the "W" boson breakup (Wikipedia)


Is the origin of the dark energy some unknown boson? 


But could there be some missing boson, that sends the wave movement? This dark wave movement rips the universe to pieces. But what is its origin? When we are thinking about the scattering of short-living high-energy particles. 

There is the possibility that there is some kind of medium. That forms before the "W" boson turns to wave movement. So before the formula of the "W" boson turns true and its particular existence ends there could be some other particle. That means the medium particle could be so short-living that researchers cannot just detect the radiation that this particle sends. And that's why those hypothetical particles can be called "flashlight particles".  But where are those particles? There is the possibility that there is some heavier particle than "Z" and "W" bosons. 

So what does that mean? That means we should prepare to fill the Standard model with new members. Those new members can be the hypothetical graviton but also there might be missing scalar bosons. Scalar boson means that the spin of those bosons equals zero. That means those bosons would not send the wave movement and it makes them hard to see. The Higgs boson is the only known scalar boson. But there is a possibility that there is more than one scalar boson waiting for finding. 


https://scitechdaily.com/a-decade-of-science-and-trillions-of-collisions-show-the-w-boson-is-more-massive-than-expected-a-physicist-explains-what-it-means/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_boson


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepton


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_boson


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_(particle)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction


https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,