Skip to main content

Does AI understand?



Understanding things is an interesting thing. We might feel that we know what understanding means. So let's take an example. We know that in most countries cars must drive on the right side of the road. We know that we must do that thing because regulations mean that we should drive on the right side. But does that mean that the AI understands why it should drive on the right side? 

There are, of course, countries where is left-side traffic. When the GPS tells the AI that the vehicle is in Great Britain, the AI knows that it should turn to the left side. The reason for that is that in the certain country is left-side traffic. These kinds of things are interesting. In the databases of the AI is programmed that the traffic is left-side in certain countries. But does the AI even know what is the country or state? 

The AI knows the GPS point or GPS coordinates where it is. Then it will compare that parameter to its database. It knows that it's in Great Britain. If we would ask about the location where the AI is it might answer us "I'm in Great Britain". But then we might check the code list and notice one thing. The AI knows that Great Britain is the area that consists of certain GPS coordinates. And when somebody asks about the location where the AI is those coordinates are connected to the database 

In that database is the answer "Great Britain". That database might involve many hierarchical structures like country, area, city area, and even streets and street addresses. The thing is that making that kind of AI that can answer the accurate location is not as hard to make as people might think. The AI will load the table "Great Britain" when it crosses the border. And if it should find the address like Downing Street 10 which is the official address of the prime minister. At the first, the AI must find the city where that address is. So it downloads the table where is the area where London is. Then it drives to London, and then it replaces the table of the database with the London database. 

Then it knows which city area it can find that address. And then it will change the tables to more and more accurate versions. If the people see that operation. The process looks a little bit like a zooming satellite image. At the first, the system uses large-area images but then they are turning more accurate and consist of smaller areas. But if that AI drives a robot car it would not use satellite images at all. It uses GPS points for finding the address. 

But if we would drive our car to the front of the Downing street 10 and ask where we are? The AI that is connected to the GPS and maybe its camera sees the plate. That system might say: "At the front of the Downing Street 10. And hat is the official home of the prime minister of Great Britain".  The thing is that the AI would find that answer from its database. And if it uses the right algorithm it can tell lots of things about the Downing Street 10 and the prime minister. 

It just searches things like Wikipedia pages about those things and then transforms those texts into speech. That means the AI would not know anything about things that it reads. The AI can search the net by connecting the information about the address. At the first, it might search the Downing Street 10. Then it finds the words "prime minister" and "home". 

Then it will position the data about the prime minister after the Downing Street 10 information. Then it would search the words like "current holder of that position". So that means the AI connects three databases Downing Street 10, the prime minister, and the personal data of the current prime minister to good and reasonable-looking things. But the fact is that the computer would not understand what it says. 

The situation is similar to the case where a regular western person reads things like Hebrew. We can read Hebrew if we have phonetic marks in our use. So if that text wrote using Western letters. We can read that thing very easily. 

We can say those words correctly. But without translation, we don't understand what we are saying. That is one thing, that we must realize when we are talking about AI. The AI can connect things like Wikipedia pages and read them. It can form a reasonable-looking entirety. But does it understand? The person who drives on the streets knows that if that person does something otherwise. Breaking the regulations causes problems. So this is the thing that we call understanding. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,