Skip to main content

The Black Knight satellite and antimatter



Picture I
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/the-black-knight-satellite-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes there are many risks about the strange objects like "Black Knight" satellite. And the biggest one is conducting theory, that this object would be made by some super civilization. In this writing, I will seek the possibility that humanoids have visited near the Earth and left the satellite behind them for observing the Earth, in the point of view, that this hypothesis would be possible.



When we are thinking about the fact of the "Black Knight" satellite, that could be the result of some early test of the launching the satellite orbiting the Earth. Maybe that satellite was sent to the orbital for testing the capacity to send the public satellite. Officially the "Explorer I" was the first satellite, what was sent to orbital, but there were claiming, that there were shot other satellites in the same day because nobody wanted to fail the first satellite, what the USA send to the orbiter in 1958. Maybe "Black Knight" is some "Vanguard"-satellite, what was sent secretly for spying Soviet radar signal. And of course, that was not told to the public audience. That "Black Knight"  satellite would also be sent by the Soviets but this is only theory. Maybe they want that Sputnik I would be number one because this "Black Knight" could look like too aggressive for demonstrating the know-how of the Soviet Union.




The super civilization might deny the stealing of their intelligence satellites or probes in a very radical way. Those hypothetical aliens could change the materials of their probe as the antimatter, that denies effectively capturing that probe. If that probe would be made antimatter, that would effectively deny all attempts to investigate those devices. Actually, we could make that process on Earth, but the mass of the antimatter would be so high, that the explosion would be the size of the supernova. Antimatter is the mirror of the normal material, but the anti-proton has negative electricity and positron or anti-electron has positive electricity. And anti-neutron rotates to opposite direction to the normal neutron. Because we can produce anti-helium, we can produce any other anti-elements of material, like anti-iron.


But the production of the large mass of antimatter is very expensive and that thing is very dangerous. The storing of antimatter would happen in the magnetic bottle, where the magnets pull the antimatter away from the layers. In this bottle, antimatter would float in the empty space, but if the magnet would be lost electricity, the antimatter would touch the bottle and the explosion would be extremely powerful. The antimatter bomb would be actually the magnetic bottle what would drop to the enemy positions, and then the ventilate of this bottle will open, and the air would touch antimatter.


We are making antimatter on the Earth very small masses, and that means that in the laboratories like CERN would be produced the only couple of atoms of antimatter in the year, for the collation tests, where the positron or anti-electron would collide with the electron. The antimatter is very dangerous because all the mass of the matter would transfer to energy if the anti-particle will contact the particle. The releasing energy level is so high, that the gram of antimatter would destroy entire Earth.


The CERN's cyclotron particle accelerator could cause very much damages in another way. It's enough that the little piece of metal like steel haul would be sent to an accelerator with the maximum energy, and then the electricity of the magnets just cut off. The impact energy to the wall of accelerator would be extremely high. And that could cause the destruction in the large areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_1


Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/58/13/e8/5813e8d966609858d22404830a7d8552.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,