Skip to main content

The Chat GPT is a pathfinder but in the future, smaller and more specific AI systems change the game.

   The Chat GPT is a pathfinder but in the future, smaller and more specific AI systems change the game. 


The Chat GPT,  Bing, and many other AI-based chatbot versions are massive systems that should fit every situation. The problem with common AI is that these kinds of systems require lots of capacity, and there are lots of sources that those systems must use. 

This thing means that the trustworthiness of sources is problematic. The reason for this thing is that the AI doesn't think. It collects data by following certain parameters. That thing makes those systems vulnerable in cases where they should search for information that is not very common. 

The smaller-size specific AI-based systems that can use the same engines with Chat GPT and Bing are more suitable for things like scientific writing. The AI is an ultimate tool if it has a pre-programmed list of trusted and estimated sources. If a writer wants information about some very uncommon things like quantum mechanics. The AI can use sources. That passed scientific estimation. The results are best in business.




The limited AIs can act as independently operating modules in the networked AI-based systems. In that case, those limited AIs act as event handlers for the common AIs. 

Maybe we think that those small AIs operate independently. But the fact is that those independently operating smaller AIs can used as event handlers. That system is connected with bigger AI:s. In that model, those limited AIs can form independently operating module networks, which makes the common AIs more powerful, and accurate than ever before. 

Those independently operating limited AIs can network below the Chat GPT style AIs. The idea is that the limited AIs can form the entirety under the common AI control. This means that the limited AI:s can form a network. That the bigger AIs can be used as event handlers. 


Next comes two examples of limited and powerful AIs. Those things can turn game changers. 



The Finnish AI predicted very accurately where the wildfire started. 


One of the examples of specific highly accurate AI is the AI that predicts wildfire. The researchers from Finnish Aalto-University have created an AI that can predict wildfires. And that AI has shown its success. In this case, the AI uses parameters like humidity in the air, air temperature, and wind speed. The system also can use statistics about the conditions and places where wildlife is starting. 

Also, things like the frequency of lightning and things that are lightning common along with rain or in dry weather are things, that help to predict wildlife. The system also can follow volcanic activity and how often and in what kinds of conditions people are making fire. If there are no spark arresters in chimneys that increases the risk of wildfire.  In that case, the specific AI follows only a limited number of variables. And that thing makes it very accurate. 


The military AI can predict where the enemy attack comes from. 


The military AI can use variables like how hard the ground is, is there some muddy river bottoms, and other kinds of things to predict the place where the enemy might want to attack. There are also many other variables like enemy vehicles and weapons that can affect to that place.

But if the enemy uses tanks the ground's hardness is extremely important. Another thing that the system must know is how steep the riverbed is. That is important information for tanks. In the cases that they cannot use bridges. 

There are, of course, many other variables that the system must have. But those two things are examples of small, and specific AIs. Those RISCs- AI:s are not as flexible as Chat GPT and Bing, but they are highly accurate. And the limited operational areas make variable handling easier than in some common AIs.  


https://www.dezeen.com/2023/08/24/ai-wildfire-model-firecnn-aalto-university-aitopia/


https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/new-ai-system-predicts-how-to-prevent-wildfires



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,