Skip to main content

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars?



In this text, I will think about the origin of the material. Not how the man got the intelligence. 

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars? The answer to the question depends on the timeline that we are handling. If we think that the history of the material starts in the particles that formed just after the Big Bang straight from the wave movement. 

We can say that subatomic particles that form the protons and neutrons are much older than atoms in our body. Electrons formed also after the Big Bang. And the electromagnetic forces along with microgravity they positioned to orbit protons and neutrons. 

This question is interesting. Every single atom in our body is formed in the nuclear reactions in the stars. Or the hydrogen atoms are formed in the quantum plasma just after the big bang. But are we children of the black holes and neutron stars? The heavier elements are formed in the extreme heat in the largest stars. 

And some of the most extraordinary elements are formed during supernova explosions. Only when the blue giant star is exploding. The energy level rises to the level that forming of the heaviest natural elements are forming. That will explain why the heaviest isotopes are so unusual things in the universe. 

The answer to the question are we children of explosive stars or maybe black holes are not simple. Supernovas, neutron stars, and black holes are creating giant waves around the universe. So those waves are causing a disturbance in the entirety. And that thing means that the material is starting to pile up at the point where the particles have more mass than in other places. 

But otherwise, the history of material is starting just after the Big Bang. And the forming of the material started a long time before the first proton or hydrogen atom formed. The quarks that formed protons and neutrons formed just after the Big Bang. And there were particles which origin was in the wave movement that came to the universe from the Big Bang. 



Image II: The standard model of elementary particles

So there was something that made the quarks forming the protons and neutrons. Sometimes one of the things that caused the piling up of the quarks is introduced Pauli's exclusion principle. Pauli's exclusion principle means that there are no two identical Fermions in the universe. Originally Pauli's exclusion principle went like this: The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle which states that two or more identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) cannot occupy the same quantum state within a quantum system simultaneously. 

And the universe can think of as the sum of all quantum systems. The size of the universe was smaller just after the Big Bang. So that means there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle affects at least the entirety of that smaller universe. And there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle shows off even today. The thing is that even if we cannot measure something that thing can be existing. 

Quarks are fermions. So there is no need for modification for that principle. And the thing that makes the difference between those particles is the energy level. Ao the more energetic fermion is heavier and that means it pulls another fermion together. Pauli's Exclusion Principle could be the key to born material. 


()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model


The image I:()https://lsc.org/news-and-social/news/join-us-live-for-the-astronomy-of-2021-jan-7-at-5-pm


Image II:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model


()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,