A couple of words about apologies

If somebody hurts you, you have the right to expect an apology. When somebody says sorry to us, that person should not expect that we forgive the thing that person made. Real excuses mean that the person who says "sorry" changes the way to act. Saying "sorry" is not apologize if the person continues that behavior.

That means an apology is always made by a person self, who made the wrong thing. Not by secretaries of those persons. Apologizing is limited to the thing that person makes.

If the person steps accidentally to another person's feet, in that case, the word "sorry" is enough. If bones are not broken because of that thing. "Sorry" means just sorry without increments like "stupid". The phrase "sorry stupid" is not feeling good. Or not even an apology.

That person should not buy Roll's Royce to the victim, not even me. Just word sorry is enough. But sometimes we are facing persons who are not apologizing for anything. They are yelling get out my way. And after that blame others that they kept their feet in the wrong places.

Perhaps some people who shout at other people against their faces have spouses who die because of cancer. But not all people who shout racist and disgusting comments have cancerous half-parties at home.

And the words that these individuals sometimes use. Still do not feel good about the people targeted by them. They may justify their behavior in such a matter, but the fact is that insulting words hurt.

Real apologizing means that it is targeted to the person who is hurt. Not to the father of that person. Asking "sorry" is pointed always to the person who is hurt. And the thing is that it should not think as a truism. I hope nobody expects that the word "sorry" would just mean that the bullying and bad things that continued even years are suddenly forgotten when somebody says "sorry".

Image: ()https://time.com/5400607/how-to-apologize-loved-ones/

Comments

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog