Skip to main content

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. 

The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states, that thing can turn even portable computers very intelligent. In this text term "intelligence" means the system's ability to collect and process data. 

All rules for limiting ICT business were made for computers that top capacity is under one megabyte. Today we cannot even buy electronic devices with so low memory capacity  At that time there was no BCI (Brain-Computer Interface). And the Internet was very slow. The quantum computer was only a theoretical idea. So things like AI were some kinds of Sci-Fi tales. But finally, the quantum computers were the game changers.


Robot warriors are problematic things. They are effective warriors that guarantee that also small nation has military power. But in the wrong hands, those things are the most dangerous in history. The robots can make a neural network-based AI system, where they act as an entirety. And every robot shares its microprocessor's capacity and information from its sensors with other group members. 

In the future things like drone swarms and AI-based systems that support drones and other robots are playing a primary role in the battlefield. The winner is who can better control those systems and who denies the opponent's robot operations more effectively.  

So the conflicts turn into a race between robots and their counter-systems. If robots work effectively they will win. But if robots are not working as they should, that thing means that the country that trusts only robots will lose. 

The AI has many types of positive things. It will revolutionize all areas of the working life. AI is the ultimate tool for developing complicated structures. But the problem is that AI is an ultimate tool in the hands of the military. Without robots and AI-based systems. The Ukrainian war shows how effective those weapons are. And without those weapons, Ukraine would lose the war in weeks. 

In "old good times" a big army was guaranteed the stronger nation wins conflicts. The robot warriors are the game changers. And even small countries can have millions of killer drones in their storage. That means that the bigger countries must take better account of smaller countries. And if we think like this, the next-generation conflicts are conflicts between robot armies and artificial intelligence. 

The robot weapons cause discussions about their morality, and the counterargument for criticism is that every nation has the right to defend itself. The robot weapons caused a very interesting thing. The large number of men doesn't guarantee the winner. Small countries will get more benefits from robot weapons than large countries. 

And we can say that even the many times bigger army doesn't mean that the bigger attacker will win. So in the time of robot warriors, the larger army doesn't win anymore. And robots are democratizing warfare. We cannot anymore make predictions about the winners of the conflicts. And that causes problems in international relationships. Even small countries can have effective military forces. And if the prediction about the winner of the conflict goes wrong, that causes problems with international relationships. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is