History is the tool to make decisions for the future.

Sometimes some wise men asked, "why we are researching history"? The answer is that by researching history we can learn to find mistakes. And then avoid making the same mistakes again. There is a phrase: "man is not stupid if he makes mistakes". But if the man repeats that mistake that thing changes the game. If a man repeats the same mistakes multiple times. There are some problems between the ears. 

But when we look at the worst mistakes in human history, we are facing the use of gasoline in combustion engines. And the even worse thing was to use lead in gasoline. Those energy sources are easy to use and easy to get, but now we are paying the price for those solutions. In the same way, we can say that trust in Putin was a big mistake. But the fact is if we are not learning from those mistakes we cannot fix them. 

We can look back and say:  in the past, we were something, like prime movers. But now we must realize that nothing comes better if we just sit and throw our responsibility to somebody else. If we want to be prime movers we must earn that position. The thing is that we must dare to begin the change. 

Change is necessary for innovation. And in the center point of business is the product. If there is no product there are no customers. Same way in the world of the military we must understand one thing. There is no fair game in real battles. Even a small country can win a larger army by using technology. The warning of that thing was chemical and nuclear weapons. And finally, robots and robot mass armies are the tools that are giving even small countries the power to resist large countries. 

Robots are good tools for jobs that are boring. But the problem is those robot workers bring a large group of unemployed people. The argument for robot workers is that they are making jobs that nobody wants to do. Salary in those works like food delivery is not very good, and working in clothes factory is also very low paid. Those people can work 12-14 hours a day. In this case, I mean the work conditions in the industrial sewing factory are not good product's reputation. 

Social media is one of the key elements in modern working life. And the power of social media is extreme. If something that is not meant to show to outside people slips into the net. Removing it is impossible. 

Modern working life is a network. And information travels very fast in the networks. And people can see what mean the law in corrupt countries. Even if somebody says that they are not breaking the law. That thing means nothing. 

From the net, people see what means "legal treatment" in some countries. Politicians cannot just pass the power of social media. They must somehow please the people who elect them to the parliament. In republics and democracies is no politician who must not care about people's opinions. We are living in a time where the only stable thing is change. And fast changes are making long-term decisions hard. 

A fast and violent change escalates over society. Network connections allow people can work from home. And that thing is one of the biggest changes in the world. I know that people want to go to work in the morning, but the problem is that the offices are only unnecessary money pits for companies. But remote work requires a new type of attitude. People must realize that the world is turning into a 15-second version of 15 minutes town. 

On Internet, we can click on ourselves to any location on Earth in 15 seconds. And if there is a camera in that location we can observe things like we were physically in that place. The only thing that limits this thing is the lack of cameras. 

The problem is how to handle change.

To create successful business architecture, we must follow trends and megatrends. But the problem is that those trends and megatrends are sometimes short-lasting events. And when the megatrend ends the new megatrend replaces it. 

When something changes people must learn to live with that change. Adaptation to a new environment requires resources. And that thing means investments. If a company will not follow the change it loses all its customers. This is the problem with change. Every time somebody makes something new. And that thing is successful others will compy that solution to their environment. 

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

What do I mean about outcasted people? (Previous text continues.)

What do I mean about outcasted people? 

(Previous text continues.)

The working environment or working infrastructure is a combination of technology, attitudes, and psychological infrastructure. When some people are saying the problem with people like cleaners. Is that they are not staying in their workplaces. We can ask is the problem with those people the bad salary? And other people's attitude for their work? The psychological infrastructure means things like small talk and discussions between the workers. 

I finished the last text by using the words: "Do we want a large number of outcast people?" in purpose. The thing is that if we are working in an environment what is not offer stable social relations and in the working areas that are not respected, that thing causes outcasting. Even if we would be social and want to talk with people, we must realize that making a trusted relationship takes time. 

If the person is working all the time alone. Or all the time in an environment where is nobody who works in similar work. That means that person would not feel like being in the group. And that causes outcasting. The things like anomalies in working time cause feeling that the person is an outsider. And if nobody ever says a good word that causes the anger and feeling that the person is nothing. 

When people all the time hear the negative things and only things what they hear are negative. That thing causes outcasting. Of course, we can remove migrant workers any time when we want. But that thing causes that we should delegate those works to native workers. And then we are facing the same problems. A person who is not satisfied to live is not a very good worker. 

Sooner or later the person will get the last drop. And of course, we can say that the employers can kick those people off. But then we are facing again one thing that lawmakers should think about, and that is when an employee leaves the company. The work that the divorced employee did must transfer to another worker. 

That thing is where the company gets new workers? Of course, the law says that employees must take the work if it is offered. But what if there are no applicants at that time? Or what if the applicant doesn't speak any language that the directors and superiors are speaking? How to advise the jobs for those people? And if the country is hostile for migrant workers those jobs must transfer to native workers. 

The problem with the works that are not respected. Is that they can cause problems for the later career. The thing is that people are afraid that they are facing people to who they are being not nice. If I would mistreat somebody, I would not want to see that person in front of me or at least as my superior. 

There are always people who are to dispel evil in their subordinates. And people who are facing the anger of those people are almost every time cleaners or some other people who are not working so high paid jobs. So this might be one of the reasons why the road from the hamburger restaurant to enterprise manager is sometimes long and rocky. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

The natural explanation for energy vampire

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some people believe that they are so-called "energy vampires", what sucks the life force from the people nervous system. So this so-called energy vampire steals electricity from the nervous, and that would cause tiredness and other physical problems. But in fact. we have met the energy vampires in the real life. The bosses, who give us too many jobs and working fellows, who always disturb people, while they have some important work, where the main role has the concentration are real-life energy vampires.


When those people are in the workplace, nothing would be done, and that might feel very bad. Also, the real-life energy vampires are persons, who harass other people in the work and make all working day feel uncomfortable. And of course, one version of this so-called physic vampire is neighbor, who keeps extreme nice parties just, when we must go to work in the morning.


But when we are thinking about the form of the supernatural energy vampire, we might think that this unbelievable creature could conduct the electricity from the human nervous system to the creatures own nervous system. This would çause low voltage in this system, and that is quite dangerous. Is this thing natural, or human-made machine is the thing, what everybody decides for themselves.


But in working place, we meet the vampire, what makes everybody feel uncomfortable. Without this person, every day would feel nice, but the problem is the persons, who behave like idiots. We all know those persons. When we see them in the morning, is our day ruined. Maybe we would not just like them, but sometimes the reason, why we don't like them, is that their attitude for comrades is disgusting.

Working life is not self-evident and kicks off from work doesn't mean the end of the life.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Racism is always mentioned as the European phenomenon, but this is not true. There is racism also among other ethnic groups like Arabs and Black Africans. Also between African tribes like Hutu and Tutsi. When we are talking about slavery, we always forget that hunting of the slaves was handle by Arabs and members of black tribes, who sold people to European slave markets for getting guns and other weapons. When slavery was officially prohibited in 19th. century, transferred European businessmen their cotton plantages to Africa, and that was, of course, needed men, who have guarded those places. The hate between Hutu and Tutsi is from that age because owners of the cotton plantages used another of those tribes for guarding the slaves.



That was because Europeans didn't want anybody knows, what was going on in those places, what could be called as near slavery. Slavery was officially prohibited because priests were justified the trade of humans very clear, but the slavery continued everywhere, where public eye didn't look. Europeans choose the tribe, what was used as guards, by using one method: they must be the minority in their area. That made them addicted to European firearms, and this was caused hate between people of Africa. Those plantages were like some concentration camps, and everywhere were only black persons, who worked in there. The guns were explained to be against predators, and if somebody would become suspicious, could that person shot and left to savanna, where scavengers would terminate the body in a couple of hours. We are living in the world, where every man should be free, and we wish to believe that the time of slavery would be over. But there is still marketplaces, where people are sold for work without payments. And now we are not talking about sex-slaves. There are a million of people in the world, who are working as the cleaners and other works, but they ever see their payments.


In some cases, the payment would go to those workers parents, and those workers would not even see their homes. Those parents have sold their children to the factories to get more money, and the under-aged worker's payroll goes to the pockets of the parents, who might live hundreds of kilometers away from that factory. There are also cases, where the company pays payments, but the money would get back to the pockets of the company owners.  In those cases, the employer says, that they would pay payments, but the worker should live in some "hotel", and then all money goes to living. The idea of this kind of slavery is that the company takes their workers only from some "hotels", what are actually some warehouses, and then the rent of those places would get all the money, what that company paid. It's sometimes kept by the bosses of the company, but sometimes the keeper of those hotels is some labor union guy, who might be the cousin of the owner of that company. Also sometimes the payroll would get back to the pockets of company owners by the very nasty way. The owner or work leader of the company tells that employee have made damages in the work, and then the company can ask payment for those destroyed stuff.


This has been the fate of some young workers even in the Western world.  But there is one model of slavery, what we might see everywhere. That is the psychiatric patients and handicapped people rehabilitation work. Those works are usually very dirty, and nobody wants to do them. And the payments of those works are poor, and they are under-ranked. Sometimes the attitude of those workers is, that their work is so bad, that they would need any payments. Also, their work has been delayed more often than normal workers, even if the quality of the work has been the same. The slavery, where payments would go to the pockets of the parents is the thing, what happens also in the western countries. In some cases, alcoholism or narcomaniacs would send their children for cleaning the roofs or delivering newspapers for getting drugs or alcohol. And those children even get food at home.


There is connecting the question of social media. When some employer claims that person would be kicked off because of the writings in social media, and if those writings were not made,  that person would be kept in the workplace. But this thing is a little bit suspicious. Is it really so, that the employer would be kept the worker in the work if this person would leave the social media? if the employer has isolated the worker, they would ever be allowed those workers to stay in their places. And if the employee writes to social media, would the kicks off be more easy that if that person would be quiet. There are people who claims that it would be easier to keep the mouth shut, but then I must ask one question: would it really easier to keep the mouth shut? And when we are thinking about the situation, that employee has been kicked off, why must that person hide those things?


I have had many work relationships what have been cut for many reasons, and I would say that I'm not an easy person, who just wants to comply everything, what the boss wants. And that have caused problems for me, but when I'm thinking about those situations, that some proud man has said that I'm not suitable in their workplace, I must say that kicks off have been easier than if I was not written about this stories. Sometimes those bosses have not dared to say everything, what they wanted. And the kicks have been coming anyway, so, why should I feel that this situation is some kind of "stigma" for me? If that is the stigma for some work instructor, that is that person's problem, not mine. This has been the nice morning to think about those things and let's go to face the new day and new challenges.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Working life is not always easy.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-always-easy.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-always-easy.html