Skip to main content

The unstable X-ray bursts in the black hole's jets shake the foundations of particle acceleration theory.


Unstable X-ray emissions can uncover the point where black hole jets are forming. The jets are forming around the rotation axle of a black hole. But the problem is that nobody knows the depth where those jets are forming. Distance to the event horizon is a thing that is a mystery. The black hole's magnetic field transports particles to the poles, and there. 

Those particles impact other particles. At that point, the energy level rises to an extremely high level. But there are also X-ray emissions in the jets themselves. That thing tells that there is some kind of friction in that structure that the electromagnetic tornado surrounds. 

Those jets of black holes also can uncover Hawking radiation. If we think that all radiation around a black hole follows the same formula, we can make a model where Hawking radiation forms the radiation pike at the same point with the jets of the black hole. So could Hawking radiation be one of the reasons for the unstable X-ray emissions from the black hole's jets? 

In models, the hypothetical Hawking radiation is the high energy radiation that is even higher energy levels than gamma rays. The extremely high-energy photons of those radiations could simply push particles away. In some other models Hawking radiation is the "sub photon". So if we think like that the photon in extremely high energy level starts to act like all other particles. And send radiation or wave movement. 


"In a groundbreaking study published in Nature Astronomy, a team of researchers led by Eileen Meyer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, has challenged the prevailing theories about x-ray emissions from black hole jets. Artist’s concept illustration of a supermassive black hole emitting an x-ray jet. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech" (ScitechDaily.com/Black Hole Paradox: Unstable X-ray Emissions Shake Foundations of Particle Acceleration Theory)


So could the hypothetical Hawking radiation be the strong version of dark energy? 


In this model, photons can send some kind of wave movement at least to the photon that is at the lower energy level. Maybe those extremely small energy channels can explain the mystic dark energy. Or at least part of it. The fact is that nobody has seen that dark wave movement. And in some models, dark energy is so weak radiation that we cannot detect it. The thing that makes dark energy dominant is that there are lots of particles that send it. 

So could dark energy be the radiation or wave movement that is left by photons? Photons are particles like all other particles. So they should behave like all other particles. When a photon's energy level is higher than its environment it should release wave movement as well as all other particles are sending. In the regular universe. That wave movement is very hard to detect. But in extremely high energy areas the photons could send wave movement that can be detected. 

The most common particle in the universe is a photon. And even if those particles are sending weak radiation or wave movement there is lots of surface that sends this radiation. So in that case. The effect of weak wave movement turns very strong. The reason for that is there are lots of particles. That sends the wave movement. And maybe sometime in the future, we can get an answer. 


https://scitechdaily.com/black-hole-paradox-unstable-x-ray-emissions-shake-foundations-of-particle-acceleration-theory/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,