Skip to main content

Can we step twice in the same river? And can we see the same object twice if we look somewhere else in a moment?

The object is much more than some outfit. The internal structure and energy level of the object means much more than just thing that the shape of the object. We can think that computer looks impressive, but without programs and an operating system, it's nothing. 

Can we step twice in the same river? Ludwig Wittgenstein and many other philosophers thought that question. The answer to that question is not as easy as people think. We might think that the river is the frame, and the water that flows in it is the thing where water molecules flow to its end. 

When we think that river is the frame or entirety, or some kind of line we can touch the same river twice. But in other ways, we can think. That the river is the water molecules that travel our past. That means we might touch the river at the same point twice, but the water molecules at that point are changed. 

That means the river might look the same as it was a second ago, but the things that are forming the river are changed. Or at least their position is changed. So we can transform that idea into a macro environment. We can think that the universe is the largest known environment and structure. The universe expands all the time. And that expansion changes the energy level of the universe. 



If we think that energy level is one shape of a particle we can ask: can we see anything twice? The energy level in the universe changes all the time. And that means the shape of particles is changed. 

The change in energy level means that the particle turns different than it was a short time ago. That means twice we cannot look at the same universe. When we see the universe and look away, and then look at it back, its energy level changes. The situation is similar like we would load electricity onto metal bites. Those metal bites might seem similar to others. But they can give electric shocks. 

When we think about the future of the universe. We don't know exactly what it looks like. We know that at some point, the energy level in the universe turns lower. That means the universe might look like the same as it's today. But it's not the same. The universe is not infinite. There is a point when the universe's existence in the form, as we know it ends. Same way if we see something all of our life we can think that thing remains forever. In the universe, nothing remains forever. Not even the universe itself remains forever. 

We can think that some mountain is forever. But the fact is that things like the explosion of Mt. Saint Helens show that nothing remains forever. As time goes even the tallest mountains are falling. And the brightest stars are turning into black holes. We can say that star just vanishes from the sky, but the star remains as a "hole" in the universe. The star exists but it's not the same star. 

Star can be lost billions of tonnes of material every second when that material turns to wave movement. So when we are looking at the star again after a second that star turns to lighter. And that means the star is not the same anymore. It's the lighter version of the star. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,