How do prepare machines for real life? And how to prepare people for the next technical revolution?

When we are creating the AI, we are facing one thing. AI is much more than some kind of killer robot. AI is the next big step in the world of learning neural networks. And this is the thing, that we must accept. The reason why people are developing technical equipment is that technology makes our lives easier. 

And it makes our life safer if the systems are made as they should and they act as they should. The problem with the people who want to put the point or limit AI development is that in the next week, the same people are telling that they begin their own AI project that is a competitor for the remaining AI systems. 

The ChatGPT is one of the most advanced AIs in the world. The thing that makes the ChatGPT almost the thing that is called the "universal AI" is that system can at least in theory connect itself with other software, like CAD programs. Then it can search for data from the Internet. And after that, it can use that data to create CAD images and plans for CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) platforms. 

When we say that ChatGPT is almost the universal AI, we must realize that ChatGPT can make many things. But ChatGPT cannot control robots. The fact is that there is a possibility that if ChatGPT is somehow making the digital twin there those limitations are removed. And then that kind of system can take robots under control. The thing is that the CahtGPT type AI requires lots of data for developing better. 

The data that users deliver to ChatGPT is used to develop and test its digital twin. I don't know how ChatGPT developers work, but theoretically, the perfect development system of AI is three cores. One is the user-interacting core. That system gets information for development work. The other is the digital twin that developers are manipulating. 

And the third core is the control system that compiles the user interactions and development-interacting cores or their program codes. That third core is the core warehouse, where the system can return to error-free mode if there is some kind of malicious code. If there are some unauthorized changes in the digital code, that make the AI, the system will tell that thing to its supervisors. That third core is also used to return the digital twin if there is some harmful code. 

But there is a small difference between the AI that operates other software in the digital world. AI that operates physical robots at the street level. Many unexpected things can happen on the streets. When researchers are programming things like fuzzy logic or uncertainty to the systems they are programming multiple precise cases. And that thing requires lots of program code. 

Same way machines can react only to situations. That is programmed in their codes. This is the reason why unexpected things are dangerous. And there are lots of things that happen in everyday life but we don't even notice them. But if those things are not included in the program code, that can cause catastrophe. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mastering-uncertainty-an-effective-approach-to-training-machines-for-real-world-situations/

The new era of fusion.

The things that keep the fusion going on in the sun are the pressure and temperature. When researchers want to make a fusion reaction on Earth they must compensate for the pressure of the sun's core by raising the temperature higher than it's in the middle of the sun. 

In those tests are used extremely powerful lasers. Some of them use ion chambers. And other lasers stress those ions with radiation pulses. In ion lasers, the ions that send radiation emission to the laser elements can be outside the element, or inside the element. 

An ion laser where ions are inside the elements is similar to a carbon monoxide laser. But the gas is replaced by ions. 

Also, the weaker lasers can input energy into the stronger laser rays. In those systems, the power of the laser rays is far higher than regular lasers. 

Pressure-driven ionization is one of the reasons why even small stars can maintain fusion reactions. The ion-anion fusion is one of the most promising things, how to make a fusion reaction. The reason for that is anion and ion are pulling each other together. 

"Scientists have conducted laboratory experiments at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory that generated the extreme compressions necessary for pressure-driven ionization. Their research provides new insights for atomic physics at gigabar pressures, which benefits astrophysics and nuclear fusion research. Credit: Graphic illustration by Greg Stewart/SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory; inset by Jan Vorberger/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf" (ScitechDaily.com/World’s Most Powerful Laser Reveals Secrets of Pressure-Driven Ionization in Stars and Nuclear Fusion)

During Fusion tests, lasers create extremely hot plasma. That thing is very well under control. But the next part is more problematic. How to make those atoms melt together? In tokamak-type "torus" reactors the plasma is homogenous because all its particles have the same polarity. That means the magnetic field must push that ion or anion ring into one entirety. 

The plasma must not touch the wall of the reactor. And that makes the ion-anion fusion very complicated in the tokamak. The magnetic field will make the plasma hover in the tokamak. And if some ions and anions mean the magnetic field pushes another type of particle to the wall of that reactor. 

Cold fusion is used every day in places like CERN and Fermilab. In those tests atoms or ions and anions are shot against each other. And during those processes, researchers create new synthetic elements. 

The anion-ion fusion makes so-called cold fusion possible. But in that version, the system uses linear particle accelerators for making enough impact energy that the anions and ions are melting to the new elements. This thing is used to make new elements in particle accelerators. But the problem is how to make that fusion create more energy than it uses.  

There is the possibility that two ion cannons are shooting anions and ions into the same point. The idea is that the particles with opposite polarity pull each other together. This type of reactor could look like a linear particle accelerator. The system will pump the anions and ions into the system from opposite sides. And then the magnetic accelerators will send them against each other. 

https://scitechdaily.com/worlds-most-powerful-laser-reveals-secrets-of-pressure-driven-ionization-in-stars-and-nuclear-fusion/

The unstable X-ray bursts in the black hole's jets shake the foundations of particle acceleration theory.

Unstable X-ray emissions can uncover the point where black hole jets are forming. The jets are forming around the rotation axle of a black hole. But the problem is that nobody knows the depth where those jets are forming. Distance to the event horizon is a thing that is a mystery. The black hole's magnetic field transports particles to the poles, and there. 

Those particles impact other particles. At that point, the energy level rises to an extremely high level. But there are also X-ray emissions in the jets themselves. That thing tells that there is some kind of friction in that structure that the electromagnetic tornado surrounds. 

Those jets of black holes also can uncover Hawking radiation. If we think that all radiation around a black hole follows the same formula, we can make a model where Hawking radiation forms the radiation pike at the same point with the jets of the black hole. So could Hawking radiation be one of the reasons for the unstable X-ray emissions from the black hole's jets? 

In models, the hypothetical Hawking radiation is the high energy radiation that is even higher energy levels than gamma rays. The extremely high-energy photons of those radiations could simply push particles away. In some other models Hawking radiation is the "sub photon". So if we think like that the photon in extremely high energy level starts to act like all other particles. And send radiation or wave movement. 

"In a groundbreaking study published in Nature Astronomy, a team of researchers led by Eileen Meyer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, has challenged the prevailing theories about x-ray emissions from black hole jets. Artist’s concept illustration of a supermassive black hole emitting an x-ray jet. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech" (ScitechDaily.com/Black Hole Paradox: Unstable X-ray Emissions Shake Foundations of Particle Acceleration Theory)

So could the hypothetical Hawking radiation be the strong version of dark energy? 

In this model, photons can send some kind of wave movement at least to the photon that is at the lower energy level. Maybe those extremely small energy channels can explain the mystic dark energy. Or at least part of it. The fact is that nobody has seen that dark wave movement. And in some models, dark energy is so weak radiation that we cannot detect it. The thing that makes dark energy dominant is that there are lots of particles that send it. 

So could dark energy be the radiation or wave movement that is left by photons? Photons are particles like all other particles. So they should behave like all other particles. When a photon's energy level is higher than its environment it should release wave movement as well as all other particles are sending. In the regular universe. That wave movement is very hard to detect. But in extremely high energy areas the photons could send wave movement that can be detected. 

The most common particle in the universe is a photon. And even if those particles are sending weak radiation or wave movement there is lots of surface that sends this radiation. So in that case. The effect of weak wave movement turns very strong. The reason for that is there are lots of particles. That sends the wave movement. And maybe sometime in the future, we can get an answer. 

https://scitechdaily.com/black-hole-paradox-unstable-x-ray-emissions-shake-foundations-of-particle-acceleration-theory/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

The semi-visible particle jets can uncover at least part of the mystery called dark matter.

Could the Muon g-2 anomaly be caused by dark matter or wormholes?

In some visions, dark matter is material that travels in the wormholes. 

Theoretically, if material travels in wormholes. The electromagnetic tornado will deny normal interaction through the wormhole's wall. The only remaining effect is gravitational interaction. So in that model, the dark matter is material that travels in wormholes. 

The wormhole would be a layered effect. The most out part of it could be an electromagnetic field that presses radio waves and then more high energy radiation like X- and Gamma-rays to bundle. 

If the radiowaves are strong enough they could form a bundle of superstrings that is closing all other radiation inside it. The most out layer of that structure would be the electromagnetic field that presses the radiation inside it into a coherent form. If the outer layers are strong enough. They can push even gravitational waves into a bundle that transports information in that channel. 

So how can two objects or particles form the wormhole? 

They must make the channel through the quantum fields. Then those particles must spin that way that they can make the quantum bundle around that channel. The channel's size must be suitable so that the outcoming radiation can form a stable quantum bundle where the outcoming maser effect keeps that channel open. If we think this thing happens between black holes. That wormhole is forming in the radiation pikes of those objects. The idea is that the quantum bundle turns so tight that even gravitational waves can turn into a bundle. That is traveling in the quantum channel called a wormhole.

Artist's vision of black hole. With spiral radiation and plasma vortex. If that spiral can turn into a bundle. That is tight enough this thing could explain the wormholes. 

Could the reason for the muon g-2 anomaly be the wormhole or some yet unknown force? 

The Muon g-2 anomaly is one of the most interesting things in physics. Does those anomalies in the Muon trajectories in Fermilab and CERN caused by some unknown natural forces, or were those anomalies the result of the interaction with hypothetical WIMP, theoretical dark matter particles? The reason why the trajectory of Muon particles changed is a mystery. 

In some visions, the curves in the muon particle trajectories are caused by impacting or some other interaction with something unknown. There is the possibility that the anomaly caused by the pike-looking quantum tornado could be a tiny wormhole. When muons traveled around the center of the cyclotrons they pumped energy away from the middle of it. That thing could open the wormhole, or make that gravitational-electromagnetic tornado dance that causes interaction with muons. 

Research tells about a strong magnetic field around the repeating FRBs Fast Radio Bursts. The strong magnetic field is the thing that pushes those FRBs into the channel. That magnetic field just pumps energy into those radio waves, and that thing causes a maser effect. When FRB travels in the magnetic field the effect is similar when laser ray travels in the laser tube where laser element pumps energy in that radiation. As I wrote before. 

That thing could prove that wormholes have existed. In this model, the wormhole is the layered effect. The most out thing is an electromagnetic field, then the radio waves and X-, and gamma-rays are forming the electromagnetic tornado. The most out layer is the electromagnetic field. And if the bundle of radio waves is tight enough that allows the higher energy radiation to make a channel through spacetime.  

And maybe the wormholes are the source of semi-visible jets and the cosmic network, the largest known cosmic superstructure. The idea is that the thing that forms the strings around objects are the cosmic semi-visible jets. 

Cosmic Web: NASA

https://futurism.com/astronomers-create-first-3d-map-cosmic-web-11-billion-years-ago

https://interestingengineering.com/science/strong-changeable-magnetic-field-surrounding-repeating-fast-radio-burst

https://scitechdaily.com/extreme-twisted-magnetic-fields-discovered-around-mysterious-fast-radio-burst/

"The ATLAS Collaboration pioneered the search for semi-visible jets, a potential dark matter signature arising from dark quarks and gluons in a strongly interacting dark sector. Despite the challenges and no direct findings, this novel research sets the first limits on semi-visible jet production, paving the way for more nuanced dark matter searches in the future". (ScitechDaily.com/Semi-Visible Particle Jets: Is Dark Matter Hiding in Plain Sight?)

 The semi-visible particle jets can uncover at least part of the mystery called dark matter. 

Dark matter is a mystery. Theoretically, dark energy is the radiation that origin in dark matter. But there is no physical evidence about dark matter, that is the strange gravitational effect. Sometimes is introduced that dark matter is free, standing gravitational waves. 

But in some other visions, the dark matter is WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles). Those massive particles could be extremely high-energy particles that spin so fast that they cannot interact. Maybe WIMPs are spinning in miniature WARP bubbles. 

That means the outside electromagnetic field slides over those particles. In that model, the WIMPs or their quantum fields are so slight that they are not sending changing waves. Without those waves, the particle is very hard to detect. And if quantum fields travel over those particles without touching them, that makes those particles act like a form of stealth bombers. 

In some models, hypothetical WIMPs are extremely small-size particles. That has a large-size quantum field around it. Maybe that thing explains why there is no interaction between WIMP and other particles. In that model when a visible particle faces a WIMP particle there is forming an energy impulse that pushes WIMP away before there is no visible interaction. Or maybe WIMP will travel through the particles. 

When researchers try to research dark matter they investigate extremely strong gravitational centers. Or launch particles in particle accelerators at a speed that is as close to the speed of light as possible. During those processes, researchers hope that they can create denser waves of dark matter that can interact with other particles. And maybe gravitational interaction or standing gravitational wave or shockwave of the extremely fast-moving particle can cause the first interaction with hypothetical WIMP. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

There is strange brain activity before dying.

Researchers observed the brain activity of four dying patients, and their observations confirm that something happens in our brain just at the time of death. 

The surge of brain electric activity just before and after death is causing questions about why the brain is acting as they act. There must be some reason why the electric curves are moving how they moving. There is a possibility that this thing has something to do with NDE (Near Death) experiences. 

But before we can turn those electric curves into visual scenes, we cannot make any kind of scientific conclusions about those things. When researchers are interviewing people who visited near death, we must realize that those people are not been dead. Even if we know what happens in the neurons, we are losing one thing. This situation is similar like we know what happens in microprocessors without looking at the computer's screen. We are losing the things that people are seeing when they are dying. 

Researching death and things that are happening in the human body while they are dying is not a very new thing. But modern scanners are telling what happens in neurons. Neurons are like hardware, and electric curves inside neural systems are the software. 

Maybe Neuralink microchips can tell what people see when they are dying. But that thing requires the AI that can decode those signals. 

Sometimes this thing is criticized, because those things tell what happens in physical neurons. Those things compared with things. We know what happens in computer hardware. But we don't open any program. But they are big steps if we compare that research with methods that are based on interviews. Advancing technology like Neuralink microchips can tell people what a person sees while dying. 

Maybe the Neuralink-type microchips that are connected with the AI-based systems that can decode the images straight from brains can give us knowledge, of what happens when the patient is dying. But are we ready to face the ultimate truth? We hope and are afraid that there is something after death.  The problem is that nobody ever returned to tell what they saw when they are going over the border. 

https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/dying-brain-electrical-surge/

Why we misunderstood the most famous quote of Albert Einstein?

Without imagination is no new products. And that's why imagination plays a vital role in the first step in the productization process.

Do you know what is the most famous quote of Albert Einstein? That is "Imagination is more important than knowledge". Imagination is the important thing at the beginning of the route, from thought to theorem and then to practical solution. The first step in the route from theorem to real models forms in imagination. 

Imagination is forming the model. The model in our brain causes need to start thinking about the possibility to make something. And then we are starting to figure things out and find out the possibilities to make something. So imagination is like a flash that makes us think about something. 

And then we start to make a model of the thing, that is in our imagination. When we are looking for information that supports or denies the model, we are starting to turn things into knowledge. When imagination turns to the next step and people are starting to make a model of that thing we can call that step the "study project". 

During that stage, researchers collect all possible information that is created for those projects. And then the theoretical model starts to form the real model. So the imagination is like a spark plug that activates the research process that turns theory into a practical solution. 

Can we step twice in the same river? And can we see the same object twice if we look somewhere else in a moment?

The object is much more than some outfit. The internal structure and energy level of the object means much more than just thing that the shape of the object. We can think that computer looks impressive, but without programs and an operating system, it's nothing. 

Can we step twice in the same river? Ludwig Wittgenstein and many other philosophers thought that question. The answer to that question is not as easy as people think. We might think that the river is the frame, and the water that flows in it is the thing where water molecules flow to its end. 

When we think that river is the frame or entirety, or some kind of line we can touch the same river twice. But in other ways, we can think. That the river is the water molecules that travel our past. That means we might touch the river at the same point twice, but the water molecules at that point are changed. 

That means the river might look the same as it was a second ago, but the things that are forming the river are changed. Or at least their position is changed. So we can transform that idea into a macro environment. We can think that the universe is the largest known environment and structure. The universe expands all the time. And that expansion changes the energy level of the universe. 

If we think that energy level is one shape of a particle we can ask: can we see anything twice? The energy level in the universe changes all the time. And that means the shape of particles is changed. 

The change in energy level means that the particle turns different than it was a short time ago. That means twice we cannot look at the same universe. When we see the universe and look away, and then look at it back, its energy level changes. The situation is similar like we would load electricity onto metal bites. Those metal bites might seem similar to others. But they can give electric shocks. 

When we think about the future of the universe. We don't know exactly what it looks like. We know that at some point, the energy level in the universe turns lower. That means the universe might look like the same as it's today. But it's not the same. The universe is not infinite. There is a point when the universe's existence in the form, as we know it ends. Same way if we see something all of our life we can think that thing remains forever. In the universe, nothing remains forever. Not even the universe itself remains forever. 

We can think that some mountain is forever. But the fact is that things like the explosion of Mt. Saint Helens show that nothing remains forever. As time goes even the tallest mountains are falling. And the brightest stars are turning into black holes. We can say that star just vanishes from the sky, but the star remains as a "hole" in the universe. The star exists but it's not the same star. 

Star can be lost billions of tonnes of material every second when that material turns to wave movement. So when we are looking at the star again after a second that star turns to lighter. And that means the star is not the same anymore. It's the lighter version of the star. 

The thing is that AI requires control. But when we want to control something, we must have the right arguments to justify those things.

 The thing is that AI requires control. But when we want to control something, we must have the right arguments to justify those things.

Non-democratic governments use the same algorithms that are used to search web cheaters for searching people, who resist governments. And AI-based programming tools can create new operating systems for missiles.  And they can be used to create malware tools for hackers, who can work for some governments. 

We living in a time where a single person can keep ultimate power in their hands. The Internet and media are turning tools that can conduct ultimate power. And there is the possibility that some hackers will capture the homepages of some news agencies. That means the person who makes those things must not be some governmental chief. An ordinary hacker can capture and change information on governmental homepages. The problem is that we are waking up to a situation in that in some countries the media has the purpose to support governments. 

And another thing is that we faced the situation, that some hackers are operating under governmental control. That means they have permission to do their work. And in countries where censorship isolates people inside the internet firewall that allows only internal communication, the position of a governmental hacker offers free use of the internet, which is a luxury for people who cannot see even Western music videos. 

We see many times arguments against AI. And the biggest and most visible arguments are not big things. That we should be afraid of. We should afraid of things like AI-controlled weapons, and then we must understand is that robots and AI democratize warfare. The biggest countries are not always winners. Ukraine would lose to Russia many times without robots. 

We don't understand that the same system that delivers pizza from drones can use to drop hand grenades in enemy positions. That technology is deadly in the wrong hands. But is the thing that we think of as a "threat" the threat that some terrorists can send the drone and drop grenades in some public place, or is it that we can no anymore predict the winner of the conflicts as easily as before? If we support the wrong side, that thing causes problems. 

AI is a game changer in warfare, and that's why we must control that thing. In the same way, we should start to control advanced manufacturing tools like 3D printers. The 3D printers can make guns. Maybe those guns do have not the same quality as the Western army guns. But criminals can use those tools. 

And when we see the quality of the Russian military armament, we can think that the 3D printer can make a gun with the same quality as the Russian military used guns. But is that the reason why we resist that technology? Or is it that if we transfer all practical work robots we don't have human henchmen?

In this case, we must say, that it's not cool to be boss to robots. Robots are tools. They are machines, and that means if we want to yell something at robots, it's not the same thing as we would yell at human henchmen. Robots don't care what kind of social skills people have. And if we yell to robots that thing is the same as we would yell to some drill or wrench. 

Another thing when we talk about AI and algorithms is that the Russian, Chinese, Iranian, and other non-democratic governments use the same algorithms that are used to search web cheaters for searching people, who dare to resist the government. 

Then we must realize that things like automatized AI-based encoding tools are making it possible to create ultimate tools for hacking. And those tools can use to create computer viruses that are taking nuclear power plants under control. Professional nuclear security experts say that it's impossible to take nuclear power plants under control. There is always a local manual switch. 

That drops the adjustment rods in a nuclear reactor. But then we must understand that if that emergency shutdown switch is in the nuclear reactor hall, and the protective water layer that absorbs nuclear radiation is lost turning the reactor off is impossible. So that switch must be outside the reactor room so that the operator can turn the reactor off. Only small error in drawings causes the emergency system not to operate as it should.  

And that is the thing that makes the AI an ultimate tool. The AI can control things and follow that people who have the responsibility to control that everything is done right are making their job. It can search for weaknesses in those drawings. But if its databases are corrupted. That thing can turn AI into the worst nightmare that we ever seen. 

We must control AI development better. But the arguments that people see are wrong. The worst cases are the free online AI applications that can generate any application that people dare to ask for. This kind of AI-based system can turn into a virus or malware generator that can infect any system in the world. And in some scenarios, the hacker who doesn't know what system that person uses can cause nuclear destruction or even begin a nuclear war. 

If the hacker accidentally slips into the nuclear commanding system and thinks that is some kind of game, that thing can cause a situation where the system opens fire with nuclear warheads. One possible scenario is that hacker just crosslinks some computer game to a nuclear command system. Or the hacker accidentally adjusts the speed of the centrifugal separator. That separates the nuclear material for use in nuclear power plants. In that case the system can make too rich nuclear fuel. And that causes the nuclear reactor melts down. 

AI is the ultimate tool that makes life easier, but that same tool is the ultimate weapon in the wrong hands. So ultimate tool can turn into the ultimate enemy. But when we are looking at arguments against AI the excuse is not thing that AI can create ultimate data weapons, or AI can control armies. The argument is that AI takes jobs from bosses, and AI makes better jobs than humans. 

Same way as many times before, privacy and other kinds of things like legislation are things, that are used against the AI. Rules, prohibitions, and other things are artificial tools. They are very weak tools if the argument is that people should do something because that guarantees their privacy. Privacy and data security are things that force people to use things like paper dictionaries and books because the information is more secure when a person cannot use things like automatized translation programs. 

The fact is that AI requires control, but the arguments must be something else, than prohibiting the AI development or use of AI tools guarantees the position of the human boss. The fact is this. Things like privacy are small things. If we compare them with the next-generation AI, which can create software automatically. Privacy is an important thing, but how private our life could be? We can see things like is a person under guardianship just by looking at their ID papers. 

Things like working days in the office are always justified by using social relationships as an argument. But how many words do you say to other people during your working day? When we face new things we must realize that nothing is black and white. Some things are always causing problems. New things always cause resistance. And of course, somebody can turn the food delivery robot into a killer robot, by equipping them with machine guns. 

Those delivery tools allow people to have access to somebody's home address. But same way if we use some courier service for transporting food to us, we must give our home address. And there is the possibility that the food courier is some drug addict. That thing always causes problems with data security. But we don't care about those things, because there is human on the other side. And maybe that thing makes the AI frightening. AI is nothing that we can punish. We cannot mirror how good we are to robots. 

Maybe the threat that we see when we talk about robot couriers and AI is that we lose something holy. We lose the object that is worse than we are. Robots are like dolls. We can say everything that we want to the robot, and the robot is always our henchman. And that is one of the things that is making the AI frightening. We think that the AI is like a henchman, and what if we lose a chess game to AI? 

Anyon-particle is a strange particle that remembers where it has been.

First-time researchers made strong observations about previously theoretical Anyon-particle. That particle is created by using a quantum computer. And there are discussions could that "Anyon" be real. Or is it a so-called simulation or virtual Anyon? The reason that makes an Anyon very interesting is it remembers the point. Where it has been.  

An Anyon particle can remember to route, and how it reached some energy level, and it means it can be a very effective tool in quantum computers.  Anyon can remember the route, how it reached a certain state.  And that thing can make error correction in quantum computers easier. 

Description of the experiment: "Creating and controlling non-Abelian wavefunctions. (a) We entangle 27 ions to create the ground and excited states of a Hamiltonian with D4 topological order on a kagome lattice with periodic boundary conditions. (b) Its excitations go beyond Abelian anyons, whose spacetime braiding depends only on pairwise linking, as exemplified by the e- and m-anyons of the toric code. (c) We create and control non-Abelian anyons mR,G,B which can detect Borromean ring braiding via anyon interferometry. Credit: arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.03766"  

(Phys.org/Nonabelions observed in quantum computer could make them less prone to errors)

"In a development that could make quantum computers less prone to errors, a team of physicists from Quantinuum, California Institute of Technology and Harvard University has created a signature of non-Abelian anyons (nonabelions) in a special type of quantum computer. The team has published their results on the arXiv preprint server". (Phys.org/Nonabelions observed in quantum computer could make them less prone to errors)

It can use to reverse the states of qubits. And if a quantum computer could make the past states by using that particle. The thing is that Anyon can revolutionize quantum computing. The Anyon can use as the quantum memristor. The system can keep resistance in qubit or its sensor stable.  It can use to control the energy that is used in qubits or quantum electronics. But before Anyon can use in quantum computing there is one thing that we must remember. 

The Anyon can also use as quantum crypto keys. The system can use that particle for releasing the information. When Anyon reaches the right energy level it can release information that is stored in it. Or it can open the quantum lock that has access to information. If Anyon can remember a series of states it can use as a key, that is acting like the physical key. And it can make the next step in crypto security and quantum cryptography. 

The system must make Anyons controlled and large numbers by following strict variables. If that thing is possible, that thing can bring new winds for cryptology and quantum processing. 

https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nonabelions-quantum-prone-errors.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memristor

https://anewtonsapple.blogspot.com/p/anyon-particle-is-strange-particle-that.html

Statistics are things that unite us.

Do you know, what unites planet hunters, stock marketers, and cancer doctors? 

All of those people are working in areas where statistics are important things. By following statistics planet hunters can search exoplanets. The changes in the star's brightness. When the planet travels between them and Earth tells that there is an exoplanet. But noticing those changes requires long-term intensive data collecting. The planets that are orbiting very close to some red dwarf cause very short periods and easily seen changes in the star's brightness. 

But if we want to search Earth-type planets that are orbiting yellow stars. We cannot use that method. The orbiting time of those planets is so long, that it requires years of intensive work. And those telescopes have limited observation time. The thing is that AI can measure the brightness of many stars at the same time. The AI can also search for differences in brightness from multiple stars. And that allows it to collect information extensively. 

Extensively collected data can make a person a very successful stock marketeer. The problem is that the person who is working in that business must follow the advancements of the stocks in companies. But the problem is that intensive following and statistics collections require time. And if the person just follows the wrong companies that is the loss. 

The AI can follow multiple companies at the same time. And because the data is collected extensively, the success is not depending on one company. The investor can select from multiple companies. And because that person can use a network of companies one mistake doesn't cost so much like a case where all money is put into one company. 

Chat GPT makes many things better than humans. And it beats humans in things like the stock trade and the AI makes the diagnosis better than doctors. The reason for that is the AI notices all variables. Another reason for that thing is that success in stock markets is based on the long-term experience of how the single target's course behaves. Experience in stock marketing is not very important. The important thing is how accurate statistics the person has. The problem is that something can happen when that person sleeps. 

But collecting statistics requires time. The problem is that one person can follow only a limited number of targets. And if the target is wrong, that thing means, the money will be lost, or profits are smaller than they could. The AI can follow the statistics of a large number of companies. It never sleeps. And that thing makes it an excellent stock trader. 

That means the person who is making a stock exchange should follow the object 24h per day, and then make a decision does the marketeer buy or sell. Everything is based on the ability to collect data from multiple targets and keep statistics about behave of those targets' courses. The thing is that AI can make very accurate statistics from many targets. And it can use multiple sources. 

When the AI searches for cancer from X-ray images it just searches for differences in the brightness of certain parts of the image. If that AI has a complete database of the X-ray (or MRI etc.) images in its memories it can compile the changes of brightness in areas that are seen in the images, and then it can make a diagnosis. It can also collect information that it gets from blood samples. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-harvard-developed-ai-predicts-future-pancreatic-cancer-up-to-three-years-before-diagnosis/

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

So is aether exist?

Speed is relative. 

When we think of the universe as a quantum system. We must remember that there must be something. That separates the system from its entirety. So the idea is that the universe is an area in a higher energy level than its environment. There is a possibility. That there is some kind of energy field outside the universe, but it's hard to detect. The reason for that is that the energy level of that energy field can be lower than the universe. 

The skeptics say that there should be a standing wave outside the universe and that a standing wave should reflect energy into the universe. That means it can be seen from the Earth. But that reflection could explain dark energy. The idea is that the dark energy travels back and forth through the universe between its center and that hypothetical standing wave. 

There is a theory that there is a so-called base energy level. In the universe. And in the 19th. century people like Michelson believed that there is some kind of aether in the energy field that explained things like wave movement. The idea was the "aether" is the energy field that connects all particles in one entirety, called the universe. 

Things like 3 Kelvin radiation in cosmic radiation background along with the theorem about the Higgs field bring that hypothetical energy back to public knowledge. Things like the warp bubble could explain that the warp bubble is the energy impulse that pulls the "aether" away.  Things like wormholes would be channels through that energy field. And the curvature of spacetime means that something pulls the energy field through a particle. And in this text, the black holes are extreme particles. 

So is there some other thing that can make a similar effect as the hypothetical "aether"? The problem is that there could be a network of radiation and quantum fields in the universe. In that model, those quantum fields are not forming an entirety. They are a network that is making the universe what it is. The thing is that we could call 3 Kelvin radiation an "aether". 

Whether through a medium, like mechanical waves, or in a vacuum, like electromagnetic and gravitational waves, every ripple that propagates has a propagation speed. In no case is the propagation speed infinite, and in theory, the speed at which gravitational ripples propagate should be the same as the maximum speed in the Universe: the speed of light.

Whether through a medium, like mechanical waves, or in a vacuum, like electromagnetic and gravitational waves, every ripple that propagates has a propagation speed. In no case is the propagation speed infinite, and in theory, the speed at which gravitational ripples propagate should be the same as the maximum speed in the Universe: the speed of light.

Whether through a medium, like mechanical waves, or in a vacuum, like electromagnetic and gravitational waves, every ripple that propagates has a propagation speed. In no case is the propagation speed infinite, and in theory, the speed at which gravitational ripples propagate should be the same as the maximum speed in the Universe: the speed of light. ((http://bigthink.com/Is there any evidence that the “aether” exists?)

The idea is that gravitation will just blow the base energy field away. Or it turns the speed and movement of that thing in one direction. When we think that the base energy field acts like water and the gravitational center pull that thing in it, that thing causes a situation where the virtual speed of an object is lower than it is. If that base-energy field travels in the gravitational center with the speed of light, the virtual speed of the object that travels in that quantum field is zero. 

Speed is relative to its environment. And that means if there is some energy field that travels in one direction with the speed of light the object that travels in that energy field with the speed of light has the virtual speed of zero. So if the rocket travels with the speed of light in a quantum field that falls in a black hole and ignites it's a rocket. That thing causes the effect that the speed of that rocket increases the speed of light if the observer stands outside the gravitational pothole. If the observer is in the middle of the system the speed that the observer sees is zero. The idea is similar to the boat that travels in the river at a speed of 50 km/h. If the observer sits in that boat, the boat's speed in comparison with the speed of the river's flow is zero. But the observer who stands on the river bank sees the that boat travels at 50 km/h. 

Whether through a medium, like mechanical waves, or in a vacuum, like electromagnetic and gravitational waves, every ripple that propagates has a propagation speed. In no case is the propagation speed infinite, and in theory, the speed at which gravitational ripples propagate should be the same as the maximum speed in the Universe: the speed of light.

"Visualization of a quantum field theory calculation showing virtual particles in the quantum vacuum. (Specifically, for the strong interactions.) Even in empty space, this vacuum energy is non-zero, and what appears to be the ‘ground state’ in one region of curved space will look different from the perspective of an observer where the spatial curvature differs. As long as quantum fields are present, this vacuum energy (or a cosmological constant) must be present, too". (http://bigthink.com/Is there any evidence that the “aether” exists?)

The upper image shows the quantum field theory. The bubbles are oscillating fields and they would create the base energy field. The question is: is that field particle-centric? Or is it homogenous? The particle central model means that the field looks like networks of waves. In that model, the virtual particles are like extremely small warp bubbles. And they would act like vacuum bombs. When those virtual particles would collapse outcoming energy field reflects from the middle of those virtual particles. 

"A series of particles moving along circular paths can appear to create a macroscopic illusion of waves. Similarly, individual water molecules that move in a particular pattern can produce macroscopic water waves, individual photons make the phenomenon we perceive as light waves, and the gravitational waves we see are likely made out of individual quantum particles that compose them: gravitons".(http://bigthink.com/Is there any evidence that the “aether” exists?)

The lower image shows: how particles are moving in waves that their radiation sends. The thing is that the quantum field of another particle can increase or decrease the energy level of the particle that is on its side. And that means wave movement can also form a network. The idea is that the particles are yarn balls in the base energy field. And particle is forming around a small quantum tornado. 

"If you allow light to come from outside your environment to inside, you can gain information about the relative velocities and accelerations of the two reference frames. The fact that the laws of physics, the speed of light, and every other observable is independent of your reference frame is strong evidence against the need for an aether".(http://bigthink.com/Is there any evidence that the “aether” exists?) The idea is that "aether" will act like gas or wind and turn the light down. 

If the universe would be empty. That thing means that materials like neutrinos would turn to wave movement immediately. The cosmic electromagnetic vacuum could destroy material-shape energy. In that model, the material is only the yarn-ball-looking frozen wave movement. Or otherways saying, the material is one energy form. And wave movement can turn to material and otherways material can turn to wave movement. 

But if that base energy field exists the problem is that we should find the frequency or the form of that wave field. That hypothetical wave field could be X- gamma or gravitational waves that travel across the universe. I have written sometimes that maybe gravitation affects the environment of the particle. That means the environment is the thing that acts like water that pulls material into the gravitational center. 

In models, the Higgs field is the thing that gives mass to particles. The problem is could the Higgs field be a universal thing that connects the universe into one entirety? Or is that mythic field local thing that surrounds the material like quarks? In that model, the protons and neutrons are the quark groups. That the united Higgs field surrounds. And that means protons and neutrons are only virtually ball-shaped. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/aether-exist/

https://informationnevervanishes.blogspot.com/p/so-is-aether-exist.html

Iron atoms and single-photon detectors can use as models for new types of models for quantum computers.

Iron atoms and single-photon detectors can use as models for new types of models for quantum computers. 

Iron stars as the models of quantum computers. Maybe, iron stars, if they sometimes are real, are acting like quantum computers. 

Any object in the universe can form quantum entanglement. There are some models that even black holes themselves can turn to qubits, and the wormholes are forming quantum entanglement between black hole pairs that are acting like qubits in a quantum computer. 

Iron stars are the hypothetical star type that could be forming in the very cold and old universe. The iron star will get its power from the iron fusion. Or from zero point energy. Iron is not a star in the form as we know stars. It's hotter than its environment, but it is colder than some of Netunus's moons. And that effect can turn the iron star into a quantum computer. 

In some visions, the hypothetical iron stars can act like quantum computers. The iron stars would exist in a very cold and old universe. The difference between the energy levels of iron stars and their environment would be higher than it's in the universe where we are living. 

And that causes a situation, where energy travels out from iron stars faster than today. That turns the iron atoms' poles would be against each other. ( + against -)And iron atoms can form radial structures. In those structures the energy bridges between iron atoms are stable. And electrons can form the quantum entanglements between each other. 

There is an idea that the quantum computer can be a plate. That is made of pure iron. That iron plate would be in the chamber. Where the temperature is zero Kelvin. And then system drives information in the middle of that iron plate by using a laser ray. The walls of that chamber would be magnetized, and that thing makes the iron plate form similar radial structures that hypothetical iron stars form in the extremely old universe. 

The information travels through the iron plate in both directions. When the chamber sends information into that iron plate it travels in the middle of it, and then it jumps back from the standing wave. The system can also surround information through the middle of it. In that case, the system will put information travel in the system like magnetic fields traveling around planets. 

Theoretically, two pure iron plates can form quantum computers. But the problem is that the electron clouds and proton's and neutron's complex structures are making the form of quantum entanglement between atoms very difficult. There is a possibility that the system can lock electrons in a certain position at a certain time by using intense light impulses. And then another laser can transport information into those electrons. 

The single-photon detectors are making quantum computing easier. 

The base in quantum computing is quantum entanglement. The most common versions of those quantum entanglements are superpositioned, and entangled photon pairs. But the problem is how to make information transferred to those photon pairs. 

And another problem is how to make that quantum entangled photon pair deliver data back from it. The answer could be this type of detector. The problem is that the quantum entanglement is made between very small particles. And the microchips are very large in comparison with superpositioned and entangled photons. So the system should operate that way that at first, it transports information to ions.  

Then those ions will transfer information to electrons that are transmitting it to the photon entanglement. The system can load those ions in nanotubes. The idea is that the ion or its electrons will lock into certain positions, and then the system bombs them by using photons or wave movement. 

The system drives information first to ions and then to the quantum entanglement. Then the system starts to operate backward. The system will transport information from photons to electrons and then to the ions. That makes the sensor easier to detect that thing. This kind of system allows the creation of quantum computers that are easier to use than systems that are existed today. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-computings-dynamic-duo-ion-trap-meets-single-photon-detector/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_star

https://anewtonsapple.blogspot.com/p/iron-atoms-and-single-photon-detectors.html

Excitons can revolutionize photovoltaic cells and help to create quantum stealth and simulated quantum gravitation.

Exciton fission can revolutionize photovoltaic cell technology. 

"Emergence of the bitriplet exciton in crystalline pentacene. Photovoltaic technology, which converts light into electricity, could be significantly upgraded by a process called exciton fission found in materials like pentacene, wherein one photon excites two electrons. Credit: © TU Berlin" (ScitechDaily.com/Exciton Fission Breakthrough Could Revolutionize Photovoltaic Solar Cell Technology)

In that image, the exciton's electron hole is in the middle of the graphene. The electron orbits the structure outside it. And then, the electron orbits the graphene structure outside it. That makes this electron will act like an antenna. That transports energy in that structure. When an electron orbits the graphene its energy level rises.  If some electron from outside that exciton fills the hole, it sends the electron in some direction. And that thing means that the exciton will divide. This process can also be called exciton fission. Another version of that reaction is that an electron hits between the electron and its hole. And that energy splits exciton sending the electron and its hole in opposite directions. 

Exciton fission is the thing that can make photovoltaic cells more powerful than ever before. Excitons are quasiparticles that form when electron starts to orbit their hole. That thing means that theoretically, excitons can form virtual material that acts like regular material. So theoretically is possible to burn excitons like hydrogen, because that electron interacts with the environment like a hydrogen atom's electron. 

Chemical reactions are reactions between electron shells. And that thing means that the exciton can at least theoretically make similar reactions as "real" atoms. The exciton fission means that the electron will separate from its hole. That thing can make by inputting another electron between an electron and its hole. Or in some other model, another electron fills the exciton's electron-hole. And that releases electrons from its orbiter. 

In that image, the string in the middle of the ring-shaped trajectory can be the series of electron holes. And particle that orbits that string could be an electron. So that thing could be a series of axions. The electron that orbits the series of holes will pump energy to them. And maybe legendary wormholes are a series of holes in the Higgs field. 

Excitons in quantum stealth and antigravitation are from the quantum gravitation model. Quantum gravitation is the important thing because that thing is the gravitational effect between the smallest possible objects in the universe. And the smallest possible objects forming larger entireties. 

The model of quantum gravitation is seen in the still image. That is taken from the film below it. The small object that rotates the string-looking structure forms the pothole in the gravitational- (or quantum field). There are two possibilities for how that object makes that. 

It could pull energy out from the energy field or increase the power of the gravitational field. The pothole is the curvature of the universe or spacetime. And those potholes are the thing that makes gravitation. 

One version of gravitation forms when some particle orbits a very thin string or radiation ray. In some theories, gravitation is radiation. Or a very thin quantum field that travels through the elementary particle. When that string travels through a particle it pushes the Higgs field away from the other side. And that thing acts like a rocket. 

Does the object pull energy out from that quantum field, or does it transport more energy to that field depending on the direction gravitation effect?  When that object travels through that quantum field that field transfers energy to that object. Or other ways, the object or particles can take energy from invisible very thin strings that they orbit. 

Excitons can be used to create quantum stealth. In that model, excitons form quantum propellers that kick photons into a certain direction. Those quantum propellers can deny the reflection from the surface. That thing is one of the most interesting things that excitons can use. But the excitons can also use for things like tractor rays and levitation systems. 

The chain of excitons can create a quantum tornado. In that model, excitons are put in the flat position. So series of hole-electron pairs can make the quantum tornado possible. There is electromagnetic low pressure in that structure. That thing means that those excitons can use to move objects. And if those quantum tornadoes are made up of the object, those EM tornadoes will pull it up. 

https://scitechdaily.com/exciton-fission-breakthrough-could-revolutionize-photovoltaic-solar-cell-technology/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exciton

Is spacetime real? Or is it just some term that researchers use in calculations?

 In some models, gravitation is the superstring that travels through elementary particles. And when that superstring travels through the particle it acts like a thermal pump. The superstring transports energy out from the particle's poles and at the same time, the energy that comes from the sides of the particle will push it in its form. 

Term spacetime means that material, energy (Wave movement), and time are the same thing or at least interacting with each other.  One reason for time is that when the universe expands, it decreases the pressure of the quantum field inside that thing that we call the universe. When the quantum field's power decreases. That causes a situation that the material starts to turn to wave movement. 

We can think the spacetime as the energy field that affects the particles. When that energy field travels in the particle their energy level rises and their aging will slow. That means their vaporization or turning to wave movement turns slower. When energy travels out from the particle, that causes the particle to age or turn to wave movement. 

So the time dilation when speed accelerates can explain that object harvests the quantum field inside it. And that thing decreases the speed where the particle transforms to wave movement. In that model, the kinetic energy comes from quantum fields that are everywhere in the universe. 

Time dilation is a phenomenon that is not very well documented. The time dilation means that time is slowing in gravitational fields and at extremely high speeds. The time dilation is measured by using extremely short-living isotopes and elements. And the final proof of time dilation is clocks, that are running too fast in the GPS satellites. When launching crew sends a GPS satellite to the orbiter. There is an extremely accurate atom clock on those satellites. 

Before launch, that clock synchronized with another clock. That is in the ground station, and the time dilation causes the need to readjust clocks in those GPS satellites. The time dilation at high speed is also proved by putting the atom clock in the aircraft that travels around the world. And another atom clock is in a stable position. When that aircraft is sent to flight. Those atom clocks synchronized, and differences between those times prove that the speed causes time dilation. 

The main question is does time exists? Or is it an illusion? Time measurement consists only of the dividings of very short living elements and particles like neutrons. The speed and gravitation are causing that energy transforms in the particles. And that thing slows their aging and transforming to wave movement. 

There is the theory that gravitation is the effect that pulls the Higgs field in the gravitational center. The slowing dividing of heavy nuclear elements. Is not the thing that makes time real in the environment.

So in that model, the gravitation turns the Higgs field thicker and thicker. And that thicker Higgs field inputs energy to particles that are falling into the gravitational center. Then we must realize that the problem is that the gravitation must send something that impacts particles. The key element is does the gravitation impact with particle's shell or does it travel through it? 

If we think that particle is a whisk-looking structure and the gravitation sends some kind of strings through that particle. That thing could make the time dilation more easily to understand. In that model, gravitation is the string or straight wave movement that travels through the particle. In that model, a superstring pulls energy out from particles. 

But first energy travels through particles shell. And that thing causes a situation, where the energy that travels through the shell structure into elementary particles loads more energy into it. And then that energy extends its lifetime. 

But then people are asked what is the thing that causes the time dilation. There is something that pushes or pulls the particle in its form. In some models, the gravitational pothole is the thing that pulls the quantum field inside the gravitational center. And that gravitational pothole pulls the particle to its form. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/spacetime-real-physical-calculational/

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Black holes and their geometrical shape are interesting things. And maybe they can explain the vaporization of back holes.

Black holes are like cosmic kebap or paper rolls. 

We can think that a black hole is a standing gravitational field. Or it's the standing gravitational wave in the middle of a black hole. If we think that the gravitational field is the Higgs field and gravitation is the effect that pulls the Higgs field inside the black hole, we can use Turkish kebap as the model of the Higgs field and how it stays and interacts in the black hole. 

The Higgs field is standing around the black holes axle like a paper roll or meat around the kebap skewer or paper is around the roll. In that model, there is an absolute vacuum in the middle of the roll. And that vacuum pulls the Higgs field around it. Then the Higgs field will start to repel another Higgs field. The energy level of that Higgs field is higher. And it pushes the incoming field away. That thing explains the black hole's vaporization. 

If we think that the black hole has two internal event horizons the radiation reflection. That comes from the internal event horizon and impacts the outer event horizon. Or when a black hole pulls enough material and wave movement inside it, that thing causes a situation that the internal event horizon starts to expand. Then sooner or later. Those event horizons touch each other. Then those things form the boom. That is visible as the gravitational waves. 

So the open question is: is Hawking radiation independent energy form or is it reflecting gravitational radiation or antigravity? In other theories, the outer event horizon transforms Hawking radiation into gravitational radiation. The event horizon is a standing wave. And that thing can transform Hawking radiation into gravitational radiation. 

And that means the Hawking radiation can be gravitational radiation that is forming inside the black hole. Or it might be wave movement that is happening in the Higgs field. The Higgs field or 3-kelvin field is the thing that is everywhere in the universe. And that thing forms the mass of the particles. 

Reissner-Nordström (RN) model

Klein bottle

The interaction in the knot point of the Klein bottle is interesting. 

Klein bottle is the model of 4-dimensional spacetime. And it's introduced as the geometrical form of the black hole. And if material travels in that bottle, it will interact in the knot point of the bottle just behind the bottleneck with material that falls in the bottle. When material drops in the black hole it starts to travel back in time, because if the escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light the time starts to move backward. The material should travel backward in time to the point in spacetime where black hole forms. And in the point, where those particle and energy flows are connecting happens an interaction that could explain the radiation of a black hole. 

Because the material and wave movement loses their energy all the time when they travel in that tube, there forming a vacuum inside the tube. When the time between the point where the black hole forms and when it pulls material inside it turns longer, the length of the tube or Klein bottle increases. And that means the energy level in that knot point decreases. 

So could that impact in the knot point explain the interaction in the black hole? When the energy that forms in that interaction starts to travel in that bottle it travels in the channel causing non-centralized energy flow. That energy flow causes an electromagnetic low-pressure just behind that impact- or interaction areas. And that thing forms the effect that pulls material and wave movement to the channel that is like a Klein bottle. 

The light cone introduces the point where at least time and maybe gravitation turns to their mirror. The fact is that the light cone can use to introduce many things. It portrays a situation where time is connected with the material. It also could portray how reality and information focus on the "now" moment. And the hypersurface of the present could be the event horizon. So the event horizon or light barrier can be the speed that is the speed of light. Or it can be the gravitational field that forms escaping velocity that is higher than the speed of light. At that point. Where the escaping velocity reaches the speed of light the information freezes. 

The light cone can use as a model of how the gravitation or energy presses information into one very small point when its speed closes to the speed of light. When gravitation will focus on a small point. That increases the surface area of that information particle. And that warps the spacetime. 

Black holes and their geometry are like bottles. 

When we think of the Reissner-Nordtröm model: the black hole has two internal event horizons. The outer and inner event horizons are very important points in the black hole. At the point of the inner event horizon, the curvature of the spacetime will increase. That thing forms the bottleneck that will dam the radiation or material that drops into the black hole. And maybe the inner event horizon is the point, where the gravitational radiation forms. 

Maybe gravitational radiation is a result of the Hawking radiation. That means Hawking radiation interacts with the very thick gravitational field. And that forms the situation where radiation can escape from the black hole. So in this model, the gravitational field is extremely thick at the point near the event horizon. 

Gravitation acts like all other power fields. That means the thickness of the gravitational field determines its power. And then, the thick gravitational field starts to reflect other gravitational waves. 

The idea is that the stronger wave field same frequency as impacting field will push that impacting field away. At that point forms the standing wave. And then we might say that the event horizon is the standing Gravitational wave. And if we look at the Reissner-Nordström model there are two standing waves in the black hole's geometry. Those standing gravitational waves are inner and outer event horizons. And is it possible that an internal event horizon forms at the point, where a black hole brings material from the future? 

So, if we think about Klein bottle as a black hole's model the internal event horizon is forming at the point where the channels of the material flows connect. 

The field with a higher energy level in the same frequency dominates the interaction when it impacts with lower energy or recessive field. And if the frequency of those impacting fields is the same the dominating field pushes the recessive or lower energy field away. And to the point where those fields impact is forming a standing wave. 

But when we return to the Reissner-Nordström model. There is a possibility that inside the inner event horizon, gravitation turns its mirror. The idea is in the curvature universe. The material or energy field cannot collapse forever. And that thing means that when the gravitational field turns thick enough. That thing causes a situation where gravitational radiation starts to reflect from that field. 

Another model of black hole internal geometry is the Klein bottle. The idea in that model is that time starts to travel backward in the area where escaping velocity crosses the speed of light. So the material that drops into the black hole will travel backward in time. And that should cause.  The particles that drop in the black hole travel back to the point, where the black hole formed.

Or actually, if the model of a black hole is the Klein bottle the material will not travel precisely to the point where black hole forms. And that thing causes a rush in the inner structure of the black hole. And that forms the inner event horizon. 

But the problem is that the singularity is not forming immediately. The material should drop in the middle of the bubble that the supernova forms. In that process, the time dilation starts to turn stronger before the event horizon is forming. And less than second in the place of the event horizon is the "grey hole". The point where escaping velocity is the same as the speed of light. 

And then the event horizon is forming. In that model, the singularity cannot transport particles exactly at the same point in spacetime where black hole form. The outcoming channel brings particles just inside the event horizon. And in that model, there is a rush at the point where particles that come from the future and particles that drop in the black hole are impacting. 

In that model, there is a rush at the point where particles are meeting each other. And that thing could form Hawking radiation. The thing is that the black hole doesn't create energy from emptiness. It stores energy and transforms it into another form. 

The reason why black holes are vaporizing is the gravitational waves. When we think that there is a so-called standing gravitational wave that is almost in the kinetic form in the middle of the black hole that reflects gravitational waves, we must remember that this pillar also sends part of itself to the environment. 

That means the gravitational waves that are coming out from the black hole are not facing resistance. Extremely powerful, gravitational radiation travels through other radiation frequencies because other electromagnetic frequencies don't interact with that thing. And that thing creates a situation where a black hole will vaporize sooner or later. 

https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/bh/rn.html

https://anewtonsapple.blogspot.com/