Skip to main content

The Schrödinger's cat and the question of the existence


Sometimes people are thinking, what kind of thing could be the real world Schrödinger's cat? The cat is closed in a box, where it cannot straight interact with us, but we can see the cat. If we try to get the cat out it will exterminate, and that cat has caused a question about existence. Is the thing that cannot interact with us some mean to us? Does the thing that doesn't interact with its environment exist? 

When we are thinking about abstraction the things like thinking is existence we might ask are our thoughts exists or not? Thoughts and the ability to create synthetic models, the abstraction in the brains are making us humans. The ability to make models are making humans the most dominating species in the world. Are thoughts exists or not? Even if we are not telling those things to somebody else, those thoughts affect us. 

Why we don't have full control of our thoughts? Why we are thinking so uncomfortable things? The fact is that this thing is made for protecting individuals. The reason why we remember bad things better than good things is easy to explain. Those things are made for protecting people against dangerous situations. If somebody yells at us we remember that thing, because that person can be dangerous later. So that thing we are remembering nasty customers better than nice customers. 

We know that other people are not seeing the existence of our thoughts but for us they are real. The thought is things, what is forming from our experiences, history, and other things, what we might want to feel and see. Many people have great ideas, and some of them are the most intelligent people in the world. But the problem is how to confirm that those ideas and thoughts are those people's own? The fact is that if some people are only thinking. 

But they are not telling their ideas to others, how other people can see, how intelligent those quiet geniuses are? How to confess to other people that the thoughts that people have are good or bad? Or they are good for bad? Making the thought to real innovation is something, that we are always afraid of and hope for. We all want to be great inventors, but we always want to stay in grey mass. And at the first, we must realize that there are no meanless innovations and inventions. 

The helmets that are washing teeth of the people might seem funny, but what the astronaut who is working in the spacesuit would do with the system, what washes teeth? Or what the astronaut would do with a small robot hand inside the helmet what puts the drinking tube to the mouth if that thing slips out the mouth? And what the same person would do with a small hover what is sucking things like vomit out from the helmet? 

Or what the military men would do with springs.  That is connected with bulletproof west for making the impact softer? Those things are extreme places, but there are always things that are turning useless useful. Who would think someday that things like gravitational waves have something to do with everyday life? 

Things like quantum computers, where superpositioned and entangled photons are transmitting data are causing scenarios, that the gravitational waves can destroy the entire system. So is it possible that someday in the future there are warnings about the gravitational waves? Gravitational waves might seem meanless but are causing a threat to quantum computers by pushing the positioned photons. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,