The problems of DEW (Directed energy weapons)

U.S NAVY Laser weapon
(Source: CNN)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The major technical problem of direct energy weapons like laser guns is overheating. The laser element rakes very much heat, and that's why it must have an effective cooling system. That's why navies of the woŕld are the first users of laser guns. Ships are rounded by sea, and seawater can be used in cooling systems of laser weapons.


Those Laser guns are the same type of lasers that are used in metal industry, and most of them are carbon monoxide lasers, what give extremely powerful radiation in the infrared area of the electromagnetic spectrum. Naval laser systems are working as a replacer of a normal anti-aircraft cannon. They simply cut off wings of attacking airplane. The problem of gas lasers is it is a tube filled with gas, what makes it a little bit hard to install to portable systems. Gas leak in the tube causes malfunction of the system. But why military men around the world are interesting with lasers?


The reason of developing of that kind of systems is that laser has limitless ammunition capacity. If a soldier uses laser gun he doesn't need any ammunition at all, and that makes laser very effective if it works.  Only thing what the user of laser gun needs is light to laser element, that the weapon will work. If we are talking about the problem of laser rifle, the major problem is that laser element must stand for strikes and hard handling. The problem with that limitless ammunition capacity is security. If laser gun goes to wrong hands, the problem is that those men don't need ammunition.


They must only get acetylene for that gun's YAG systems acetylene lamp, and after that, they are free to shoot. That causes problems with public security because nothing puts limits to shots. And that is a very bad thing if those weapons go in wrong hands. And if those weapons are used in criminal actions, the user can't be tracked by rifle picture on bullet or DNA what leaves to patrons. That will make those weapons extremely dangerous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyUh_xSjvXQ

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Laser bullets are next generation equipment for assassins

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Have you ever heard a term "laser bullet"? That means single-use laser weapon, what might shoot from rifle or cannon. Those equipment are normal patrons, what are filled with flashlight powder, and in the middle of that patron is a crystal stick, what is made of glass or sugar. The idea of that structure is that patron works as a miniature laser.

Ends of that stick is a mirror, which is normally used in lasers. In another mirror is a small hole, and between those mirrors consists a laser ray, what means coherent light. The problem with that ammunition is that flashlight powder doesn't make enough exhaust gas to operate automatic weapons lock system. One way is to modify a gun for the electric operating system when there will be no need to worry about the pressure of the powder gas.

There is very easy way to fix that problem. Just stick a grip to the gun, what can move feedback system, and pump action laser gun is ready to use. Or just modify those patrons suitable for shotguns, where is pump mechanism ready. The problem with laser bullets is that ammunition is untrackable. That makes laser weapons so dangerous. That ammunition is pure light, and that's why officials can't track them any specific weapon. But if we are talking about "real laser guns", what might look like the normal assault rifle, but inside that weapon is a laser element what is made with special glass.

Many people think that those guns need lots of electricity, but YAG-technology makes possible to build very powerful lasers, what doesn't need more power than a 5-volt battery. That technology bases with acetylene lamp, what pumps energy to laser element. That element could be made with pure carbon, what is converted to a very huge pressure to one kind of diamond. The trigger is working as the switch, what turns on and off the electric circuit when the user will pull it.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi

Is this an ancient sacrificial stone?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The picture above advances a strangely shaped stone in southern Finland near capital city Helsinki. Its strange shape makes me think is that an old sacrificial stone from the pagan age of Finland. That will not so far away from truth than people normally think. Finnish landscape is moraine, and there is full of quite small stones. That stone what is in this picture is so-called black granite, what is very strong mineral. And stones doesn't face much erosion in this kind of places. An erosion is a very common thing, what destroys relics, but if the stone will crush by trees or ice, that erosive material must get its way inside that stone.


And if there are no scars in stone, the ice can't break it. That's why this stone might be very old sacrificial stone because it looks like handmade an object. Of course, it might be a stone from the old building site, what workers have throw to the forest, but that will not explain that kind of shape of that strange stone. Here on the southern coast of Finland is a very old tradition for settlements, because Estonian coast is so close, that in ancient times tradesmen sailed across Baltic Sea, to change their stuff from central Europe to squirrel fur and another kind of pelts. And of course, when Russian empire rises, the sea route to Tallinn was grown more important, because relations between Sweden and Russia were not very good during 15th. to 18th. century.


In those times Finland was a part of the kingdom of Sweden. And that time has much influence of nowadays Finland. When we are talking about the pagan time of Finland, we must remember that old tradition does not disappear in one night, and I'm quite sure that old pagan cults were in the mind of people long after crusades of Swedish in the 14th century. Those crusades officially ended paganism in Finland, and punishment of those rituals was execution, that kind of traditions are strong in people mind.


And maybe somebody still believes in those old gods. I know that this sounds quite crazy, but there are rumors that somebody has been sacrificed to some ancient gods even in nowadays. That might be some kind of joke, but there are stories, that in somewhere in Lapland have people found ritual executed animals. But those stories might be only jokes or rumors. But it is bad to say what is persons right attitude of religion.


Those sacrifices might also be some kind of Wicca or something else new-pagan hobbyist work. That kind of rumors doesn't mention when those ritual sacrifices have been done, but they are interesting to hear. somebody says that they happened in to begin in the 20th century and wildest rumors say that they were from the 21st century. But who wants to believe those things is that person's own business. But they could give a strong subject to some Hollywood's movie manuscript, where the hero finds old cults from modern society.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi

Nanotechnology might bring cure for dangerous animals and fix injuries in human body.

Nano-robots
http://www.zdwired.com/nano-robots/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When people get infection in the blood, they are in very bad risk to die, if antibiotics don't take effect to that organism. The problem with amoebas and worms is that that protozoan is that they are so huge in front of our leukocytes. That's why they will eat our leukocytes, and only thing, what is left for destroying those protozoans from our blood are huge doses of antibiotics. The mission for those antibiotics is to kill those animals from our blood. But the problem is that those antibiotics will kill also our normal cells and that's why they are dangerous to use. The solution of that problem might be found from nanotechnology.

Nano-machines can destroy those very dangerous things with making holes in their body, and by forcing them to die. Those new type of intelligent nano-machines can communicate with, microchips what are implanted to the human body. But nanotechnology can do much more with human health. In some accidents and poisoning, cases will oxygen level in the human body can decrease in extremely low level, and some people see nanotechnology as a solution for that problem. In this scenario in the human body will inject tiny balls, what is filled with oxygen. Those little balls will be carried to cells, and there they will release oxygen. 

Nano-robots might use in accidental cases to carry cells to the target. Those cells might be grown outside of the human body, and small robots will carry them to the right place of victims body. That will help fix those injuries very fast. Those cells will inject to person's body, and there those little robots will begin to carry them to bones and muscles what are damaged in that accident. In the wildest dreams, those tiny machines give the person a super-immune-system. In those visions, that kind of machines can even replace human leukocytes and in some scenarios, those machines will defend us from an attack of bears and snakes. If a bear or some other species attack a human, those nano-machines will attack against that animal and make it body liquid.

But there are more impressive visions about what technology can be made for human cells in the case when there is a problem with oxygen level. The vision is to use genetic manipulation to increase human performance. It would be done with specially modified viruses, to transfer the genetics what makes photosynthesis possible from vegetables to human cells. After that, there could be possible that human skin will start to use photosynthesis in the human body. That, of course, will rise oxygen level in that person's skin. That biological advantage can increase human performance very much. 

Source of image: http://www.zdwired.com/nano-robots/

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Why media will handle only a negative part of the life?

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The problem with media is that there will ever be introduced an average person's life. A person who is the main character in documents and movies is always some kind of ultimate version of people what represented of some lifestyle, what is introduced in those programs. Do you think that Pablo Escobar is some kind of an average version of the drug dealer? That man had billions of cash, but does some so-called “street level"'drug dealer that kind of money, or does he even dream about that, when that person hangs around some shopping center and sells some crack-capsules. What made Escobar so frightening person, was his money.


He could hire mercenaries to support his reputation. But I always thought that Escobar was only a shield man for some other actors in that dirty business. If people have money, he could do almost everything, but if he want’s to hire a mercenary, must he have the right relationships. Nobody wants to get smoked that the person has been worked as a mercenary. That’s why they take jobs only from agents who they trust. And being mercenary in somewhere Africa is the little bit different than making murders in normal western State. If a person will smoke that he is an assassin, will he or she punish by the court of law? The line of that kind of people is extremely tough. Those prisoners ever get out from prison.


But in those cases like Escobar, we might see what is the direction, where media sometimes goes. I don't know why they are not writing about guys who were in gangs and after that, they began to live a normal life without any problems. Why the objective of those documents is always so negative? They always begin that kind of problems with interest, but soon after intros, the journalist really begins to show really bad attitude for that case. They just are beginning to find some errors in that case, and sometimes the information what has been given to people is very grotesque.


They bring in front of the public eye some that targets friends, who might be in jail. But they never tell to people, why those people were arrested and what was a crime, where convictions came. And of course, they never tell to people, how long those "criminals" were been in jail. Only thing what is mentioned, has been that those persons are convicted for some crimes. If we see that kind of journalism realistic, we must be naive.


There is always news where drug user brutally killed the people who helped them. But when we are taking a focus in those stories, we must realize that narcotics users might be very dangerous and unpredictable because they have hallucinations. But when we are talking about those cases, there have been only a couple of that kind of cases in the Europe. And didn't anyone told those people, that if somebody uses drugs, he might be blackmail by his fellows to let them in?


And why reporters only take this kind of crimes on the front pages of newspapers? In here I must ask, is the help what came to those persons so altruistic at all? Why they bought a cell phone to that guy? I know that these are the most brutal worlds, what anybody can write, but didn't anybody tell to those people, that money should ever give drug user or alcoholics. They just buy more drugs with that money. When narcotics control the person, he or she might not able to control his or her actions, and that's why those people might be dangerous. But why media tells stories about only those cases, what ended sadly way?

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Everything is not always how it seems in the first sight

Kimmo Huosionmaa


https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/artikkeli/suuri-suomalainen-oikeusmurha-vaara-mies-saattoi-istua-elinkautisen-hamaraperaisesta-huumemurhasta/6597516

When we are talking about using information telephone's location for tracking some people, we must remember that that thing basis the cellphone. Nobody knows, who carries that cellphone. So anybody could take the cellphone the room table or something and walks away from the flat before the murder.  They might think on the court, that that cellphone was in the hands of somebody else.


Those tracking information proof that cellphone was in somewhere. And it can be given to somebody else. That cell phone could be in somebody else's than it right owner's hands.  Anybody might have that SIM-card or cellphone, and a problem for the defender is that he took a part of that violence.


The problem is in the background of those people. In the court, they must think that cellphone or the SIM-card what was used in the collection of the tracking data was in hands of somebody else than this man, who says that he is innocent. It would be nice to know is that SIM-card a prepaid or normal telephone subscription. And that other person's might claim, that they got that SIM-card from this man for something like paying the bill.


They were narcotics users and perfect targets for that kind of set up. If they took some drugs before the crime, they might not remember even remember how many people were in the flat. In the justice system, there is a problem in this kind of cases, that everybody tells lies when they sit in the court hall, and also judges and police officers hear all the time stories about some "unknown man", who slipped out the murder place.

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.fi

Is the story about Luther and his theses literally true?

Martin  Luther
(1483-1546)

Have you ever noticed a strange thing in the picture of Martin Luther? His left eye seems not always painted in the same direction with the right eye, what might mean that his left eye might be blind. Or probably he had strabismus in that eye, but why the painter had put that thing so visible in his painting of the man, who became famous for his work as the church reformer and the man who created the Lutheran church. Is that eye injured something in his younghood, and does that presumable injury have something to do with his antisemitism?

When we are talking about Luther, we always forget, that nobody borns in age 40. So did he went to fight with some jews, and did something that happened in that fight cause that hates Jews? Or was Luther cover something with his hate? I read from some book that Luther had Jewish friends or at least mates, who visited at his home. So what Luther might cover, when he began to write anti-semitic writing named as “About Jews and their lies"?

Was he make business with Jews, and if theologian will uncover that he lends money from jews will everybody laugh to him. Or was the thing more serious? Was there something that drove that priest to break his connections with catholic church? Something that might cost his life. So was Luther a man who changed a place with somebody else? Was real Luther killed by that man hand, and did he took a place of his victim? Is that reason why he created a new church, where priests use people's language when they speak to normal people?

What was his motivation to begin that process, to start the reform for the church? Did he really want to establish the Lutheran church?  But there is one thing, what every investigator must know about this man, and other famous people in history, There are many text and fact about them, what is not literally true. Some texts for their life have written after their death because to protect that person’s real identity. So we might only guess where Martti Luther actually lived when he made his translation of Holy Bible. The biography might be true, but it might also be colored.

The facts what we read today might be written by some propaganda writers during 30 years war, where the King of Sweden and other protestants wanted to break catholic leagues lines by claiming that Luther was made translations of the Bible under the protection of some German prince. So when those writers wrote his biography, the outcome could be something, where Luther can’t even recognize himself. And that’s why those biographies are not always followed real life of that person.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi