For the first time, CERN created the laboratory version of the black hole's antimatter and material jets. And that thing opens interesting visions to dark energy and wormhole research.
One reason why black hole relativistic jets are so powerful is that they form antimatter. The antimatter forms when material. That comes from the black hole's axle impacts energy from the material disk around the black hole. That high-energy reaction turns the spin of some particles to the opposite. And that forms a high-energy interaction in the black hole's relativistic jet. This thing makes this relativistic jet more high energy than it should be.
The relativistic jet is an electromagnetic wormhole itself. But could that thing be a so-called real or gravitational wormhole? So, can the electromagnetic tunnel turn so tight that it will not let radiation travel through its shell? Maybe antimatter-material annihilation can make the Einstein-Rose bridges possible in the real world. The idea is that there is a spiral-shaped structure around the hollow center.
And material-antimatter annihilation happens in that spiral. The extremely high energy reaction can deny that the outcoming energy or quantum field cannot travel through that channel. And the high-energy reaction pumps energy to objects that travel in that wormhole. That thing denies energy travel out from the objects.
So, in that model. Annihilation makes that structure as tight as gravity wormholes. The high-energy annihilation reaction at the electromagnetic tunnel's shell can turn electromagnetic wormholes similar to gravity wormholes that can transport energy and particles through the universe. The thing in wormholes is that they don't let energy travel out from particles.
The energy level in particles stays stable, and energy flows out from them is aging. Denying energy flow out from particles denies their aging because energy cannot flow out from them.
In the time-arrow model when particles get older they deliver energy to particles and other objects around them. That thing means that if some particle can send a pulse. With a high enough energy level that thing pushes those other particles back in time.
When the big bang happened. we can think of that event as a time arrow. When that energy or radiation was released it turned time travel opposite around it. In some models, the Big Bang happened because time moved opposite. So in the thing or point before the Big Bang time could travel opposite direction than in our universe.
********************************************************************************
We can explain why we have no antimatter in the universe like this: Schwinger effect formed particle-antiparticle pairs. Just after the Big Bang, and then those particle-antiparticle pairs annihilated.
Again, the Schwinger effect formed new particles. That annihilation happened in a powerful energy flow that turned those particles spin in the same direction, forcing the material into the form we know it.
So, as I wrote before.
Schwinger effect or wave-particle duality is the thing that proved that material or particles are one energy form. And energy and material are the same thing. The wave-particle duality must be possible between gravity waves and dark energy. That means dark energy and gravity waves can also create material or particles, that are unknown to us.
********************************************************************************
That causes an interesting question: Does time travel backward somewhere in the universe? In black holes time travels backward, because their escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light. It's possible. That time travels backward in wormholes if there is a structure that pumps energy into particles. And if particles cannot send that energy away, it turns younger.
The great annihilation just after the Big Bang formed material in the form as we know it. That annihilation created a situation where the impacting wave movement formed particle-antiparticle pairs. But those particle-antiparticle pairs formed in an extremely powerful energy flow. That energy flow turned all particle's spin in the same direction. That energy flow forced all known particles to turn into material.
In the Big Bang, formed the same way matter and antimatter particles. Annihilation between particles and antiparticles just after that event formed the material in the form as we know it. The Big Bang might have happened just before the particle-antiparticle-pairs formed. And those particle-antiparticle pairs could be something that we never imagined. That particle-antiparticle annihilation formed the chaotic condition where impacting wave movement formed the particles.
The reason for the lack of antimatter might be this. When those first elementary particles formed, they formed in an energy flow that traveled in one direction. That direction made those particles spin in the same direction. That energy flow made homogenously spinning particles that form material. The thing is that the different or opposite spins make some particles antiparticles and some particles material.
When we think about the Big Bang, which released time and material into space, we must realize that dark matter and dark energy are mysteries. It's possible. That dark energy and dark matter can exist before the Big Bang.
Maybe the first Big Bang that formed particle-antiparticle pairs formed dark energy and dark matter. The second Big Bang was annihilation that formed material as we know it. In that process, the first entropy formed the Big Bang.
Then, the second entropy formed particle-antiparticle pairs. And the thing that formed material was the great annihilation that maximized entropy. Entropy or disorder in a system makes wave movement impact forming elementary particles. The thing is that we are in energy that formed in the Big Bang.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/all-nothing-expanding-universe/
https://scitechdaily.com/matter-antimatter-black-hole-jets-recreated-in-cerns-laboratory/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality
Comments
Post a Comment