When an anomaly turns normal.

 When an anomaly turns normal. 

In this text. The term “secret society” means an isolated group of people. Or, a group that has hostile attitudes against outsiders. Those groups don’t want outsiders to see their rituals and everyday life. And, they operate outside the public surveillance. That means some gangs, and especially MC-gangs and organized crime like the Mafia, are a secret society. Monasteries, isolated hospitals, and prisons can also form societies with rules and abilities that are foreign to us. 

These people must follow orders and code very carefully, or they face punishment. The code in those societies might be stricter than the army's code.  Because people are not allowed to see things that happen behind walls. That rises to conspiracy theories. But sometimes the truth is stranger than the story. The North Korean regime is one of the most powerful societies in the world. That regime has certain rules, and if somebody breaks them. That causes death. 

The image above shows the abandoned mental hospital, Kellokoski, Finland. Mental hospitals are one example of the places where things that are abnormal or condemnable turn normal. In the same way, when we think about things like some MC-gangs, there are things that outside society will not accept. For us, society is the place where laws and official authorities determine what is normal behavior. 

 Or they don’t determine normality. They determine things that are allowed. When people are in a closed society, they are surrounded by people. With a certain ideology. Or a certain way to think about things, like what is right or wrong. Closed societies are always preventive, against outside influence. And things that bring them outside influence are outsiders. 

And that is one thing that connects all closed societies. They think that the outsiders are enemies who want to destroy their lifestyle. Closed societies always involve hierarchy. That means higher-ranking members of the society have the right to give orders to members at lower ranks. Those who have a duty to follow those orders. Another thing is that. 

The higher-ranking members are always at the middle of the system. And its hierarchy. When a higher-ranking member wants to get out, there is always a circle of henchmen. Many people believe that a secret society is like some kind of army. A secret society, like Hell’s Angels or the Mafia, is an organization. That has certain ceremonies to select its members. Those ceremonies might be very humbling. 

Same way. Basic training in the army is not the best time in people’s lives. But the biggest difference between some MC gangs and the army is this. The MC gang memberships are open only for people who please the elder members. All MC-gang members have similar opinions. They have the same attitudes. And that forms a suitable environment for encouragement and radicalism. 

Because all of those people are similar, that means they all react to the same provocation in the same way. When somebody starts to encourage others. That can cause a domino effect. And people start to keep racing to tell. How did they all face disrespectful behavior? In those gangs, the women are a status, who are reserved for the higher-ranking gang members. 

In the army, there are always people. And there, people must not share their personal merchandise. Those who do not have the same opinions about things. They must follow orders. And there are rules. About the admissions requirements. 

But another fact is that tank men and tank leaders have different admission requirements than paratroopers. And they don’t have to respect their superior officers as persons. They must follow orders and respect those superior officers. As governmental representatives. In the same way as the government wants people to respect police and other law enforcement authorities as the government’s representatives, not as private persons. 

The army is not a secret society. There are certain rules for making things. There is enough that the person follows the orders. The secret society acts like an army. If we look at it from the outside. But the key element is that those people always have homogeneous backgrounds. There is a possibility that those people who are members of the most violent gangs have a long criminal history that has continued over generations. Their parents could also be gang members, or something in their environment taught them that crimes are an accepted way to earn money. 

Artificial bacteria are the biggest hope and the biggest threat.

   Artificial bacteria are the biggest hope and the biggest threat. 

Artificial bacteria are not. Like natural bacteria.  

DNA and mRNA are tools that can rewrite a cell's genetic code. That means the cell changes its shape and then starts to make different things than the original cells. The ability to program cells is an opportunity. And threat. The ability to remove hereditary diseases from the human body. The problem is that the same technology allows researchers to make  more perfect lifeforms. Than natural organisms. Artificial life normally means bacteria. Created using genetic reprogramming. In that case, the DNA bits will be collected and connected into the new form. That allows researchers to create bacteria that create antibiotics and spider silk, which is the strongest material in nature. 

Bacteria can be reprogrammed to search and destroy cancer cells. And probably, genetically engineered cells can form tissues for the bioprinters. Reprogrammed bacteria can also make it possible to create a large mass of things like skin. In that case, bacteria are on the nutrient platform, and the system just changes the DNA in their nucleus. Theoretically is possible to create anaerobic bacteria. That releases oxygen into blood vessels. That kind of anaerobic, biological oxygen synthesis is one of the most fascinating things in biotechnology. 

The ability to create artificial bacteria allows researchers to create new types of biological weapons. The same thing. That allows bacteria to search and destroy cancer cells. Allows weaponized bacteria to find things. Like neural structures or the blood vessel wall. And then attack those vital tissues. That kind of bacteria is very dangerous. There is a possibility. The bacteria themselves copy the targeted person’s cell antigens into themselves. And another dangerous thing is that. Those bacteria can destroy themselves after a certain time. When we think about the perfect, artificial organisms, we must realize that those organisms can turn the “Alien” movie monsters into reality. 

There can be infectious bacteria that can create things. Like the HIV virus at the same time. That allows those bacteria to destroy the immune defense at the same time. Here, we must remember that artificial bacteria are made. Connecting DNA bits together.  It is not like natural bacteria. That means those bacteria can make things. That is not possible for natural bacteria. 

Researchers can create artificial organisms, and the same technology that makes bacteria resistant to poisons can turn them resistant to antibiotics. When we think about aliens, we might think of a very complicated lifeform. from outer space. The fact is that the term “alien” means something non-natural. Biolaboratory can create aliens that nothing can resist. Those aliens are not like humans; they are microscopic organisms. Those creatures can be a fast-increasing bacterial population. Those bacteria can look like hospital bacteria. 

The thing that protects us against immune-resistant super bacteria is their complicated form. Their population will not increase fast enough to it can cause problems outside the hospitals. Natural bacteria destroy those organisms very fast. The biggest threat is the super bacteria that can increase their population too fast. If antibiotics cannot destroy those bacteria. They can cause problems. 

https://futurism.com/scientists-synthetic-lifeform-syn57

Images: Futurism.com

Superficialism is a big threat to people.

   Superficialism is a big threat to people. 

If you let AI make decisions for you, blame yourself. Who is responsible, if we offer our free will and ability to criticize some machine? When we follow the orders that the machine gives, we offer our free will to the machine.

The Internet and modern society favor superficial people. People who deliver their ability to think to some machines. When we process the information we receive, we might ask ourselves if we truly think and process that data? Or do we simply click the homepage, search for about three seconds, and then move to another homepage? Do we even read more than some titles from homepages? Can you, or I, draw some conclusions using those titles? And then, do we move to some more interesting homepages? When we search for things on the net. We can search only for homepages that please us. That is one way to see things. 

If we just follow the instructions that the AI gives. We give leadership to the machine. If we never ask why AI makes something, we lose our way to introduce criticism. If we just follow orders and be quiet, that means nobody even knows that we have some different opinions. We can think what we want, but the thing is, how can we share those opinions with other people? 

When people are worrying about things like reading books, we must dare to ask one thing. When did you go to the library? And lend some books?  When your boss said to you that you can keep a couple of hours free to go to the library and search for information in those books? Or do we lend books that we can fill shelves? Using books? Or do we really open those books and then concentrate on those things? And when we spent our lunch break discussing books that we read? The decision is ours. Maybe we read books. Maybe we read texts from computer screens. But if we want to share our opinions with other people. There is always something more interesting. 

There are two ways to think about things. 

1) We can notice that something has happened. 

2) We can notice that something has happened, and then ask why that thing happens. 

We must realize that people always lead governments and nations. When somebody talks about value-based realism, we should ask: 

Whose values? Whose realism? Or, who describes our values and realism? Or things that we tell outside as values and realism? Are those things serving only the majority? And when we defend some minorities, we must realize that those things can also serve something. We can use things like racism as an excuse to kick our competitors. So, when something comes to the newspapers and their headlines, we must ask ourselves, why did that thing become so important, just in that moment?

Things like sports and some lone island survivor reality TV are more interesting than some ideas that some writer introduced a long time ago. When we sit at our desks in our workplace. We must be quiet so that we don’t disturb other people. So we just sit, look at the screen, and be careful not to disturb our workmates. Is that the environment where it is easy to share opinions and offer analytical thoughts to people? 

But otherwise, why can’t we tell our opinions to other people? That is the thing that. We must realize, before we introduce some criticism. If we just sit and look at things. That might look something. We cannot accept; we can follow two routes. We can sit quietly, and then other people say that we have nothing to say. We can share our opinions with other people. When we face social media, we must understand one thing. Many people misuse that tool. They introduce opinions that we cannot understand or accept. And we have our free will. We can read things that we know are false. We can remove that false information by closing social media accounts. Follow the official media. 

And then we face a thing. Maybe we disagree with the opinions or things that official media shares. Maybe we have better knowledge than the reporter, but then how can we say that to people who read those  articles? Maybe we should write that in newspaper opinion pieces. But what if they don’t publish that thing? Journalists are also human. That means the journalist has their background, opinions, and other things. That always affects people's way of thinking and writing. When we use AI, we forget. That AI uses datasets. Collected by humans. Humans make decisions about what the AI should give and what it should not give to people who use it. 

Thinking is not enough. We must have the ability to say something. If we just sit and look at the music videos, we must realize that people never see our opinions. That is enough for people like Kim Jong-Un. People can have their opinions. But they must follow the regime. They are not allowed to say or write things that are against the regime. So, does the regime somehow deny Western people the way to introduce critical opinions in public media? We remember that critical workers were gifted to the company. People celebrated those people as heroes. 

But then we might ask, how critical are those employees really? Did they criticize their henchmen or their leaders? Today, we say that social media kills that kind of criticism. Where employees say that they see something that is right, using evidence-based arguments. Criticism without justification is not  effective way to effect. If there is no evidence. That kind of criticism is easy to knock out. But when we want to introduce criticism, we must remember that it’s easier to criticize a henchman using authority than to give critical feedback to the superior. 

AI doesn’t make U-turns.

   AI doesn’t make U-turns. 

   

We don’t always make our best move. That means we don’t always choose the fastest way to travel between two points. We simply might like another route. We might like things that we see while we travel some other, slower route. And that is inhumane. The AI always predicts that we choose the fastest and most economical route. AI thinks that we don’t look at things like old houses. AI always predicts that we travel to some other place using the fastest route. It believes that we want to make journeys in the shortest time possible. It doesn’t think that somebody chooses a longer route, because that person wants to improve fitness. 

And that is the thing that differs AI from us. 

The difference between the human and AI approach to playing games like chess is this. The AI never plays anything for fun. Or the AI will never “kill time” with games. When humans play chess, sometimes we just move pieces on the chessboard and think of other things. AI always “thinks” that we play games to win. Not just to kill time, when we wait for things like a weekly meeting. This is one of the differences between AI and humans. When AI tries to predict things like interactions in nature. It makes things better than humans. The reason for that is simple. Everything that happens in nature happens in a linear way. When action happens. A reaction follows that action. When snow starts to fall on the slopes, that action continues until the avalanche reaches the bottom of the valley. The avalanche follows the laws of nature. It will not change its mind and start to travel backwards. 

And that is the difference between avalanches and humans. Humans can change minds. When a human starts to walk across the street, that doesn’t mean that the human will go to the other side of that street.  Humans can change their minds and make a U-turn. This is the thing. That makes human nature unpredictable. And that is one thing that evolution is made for: protecting species. And that makes humans difficult prey. When some animals hunted humans. We can run to the thing that seems like a dead end. And then put their spears against attacking animals. This way of making something unpredictable. Makes it hard to predict human behavior. 

AI follows the same marks as human psychologists when they try to read humans’ feelings. The ability to use special sensors to see how blood pressure and adrenaline levels rise. If the AI doesn’t have those sensors, it must follow body language. And the way a person speaks. In those cases, the sensor systems that the AI can use. Mean as much as AI itself. If the AI can use lie detectors. It is not very hard to make an algorithm that uncovers lies.  In that case, sensors mean more than an algorithm. 

When we see cases where somebody cheats people who serve as royal guards, we know that thing makes those people angry. Those people, with ultimate strength, can hide that emotion. We might be very angry. But in some cases. We don’t tell this to other people. Animals never hide their emotions. When human turns angry against a superior force. That means humans might not attack. Humans can flee from the field and wait for a better moment to strike. That is one of the things that makes us the ultimate species. 

Let’s go back to the chess game. The algorithm predicts that we always make the best move. And this is the algorithm’s ultimate strength. And that is the algorithm’s ultimate weakness. We might think of cases where a boxer faces many practice opponents. That boxer can win all of them easily. But then in the title fight, the opponent knocks out our boxer. In that case, we forget that. Some boxers can lose their training matches because they bet on that opponent. This means the training opponent can lose matches that nobody sees. But when there is a kind of meaning. That a person can fight differently. This is the thing that AI doesn’t always understand. Humans can save their best moves for the places where those moves mean something. So, we can think about different things than what we make. 

Gravitational waves and quantum models II

 Gravitational waves and quantum models II

So what put the gravitational field into motion? That is one of the most interesting things in the universe. When the gravitational center sends gravitational waves, those G-waves transport energy out from the field near the gravitational center. We can simply think that the energy fields are weaker near the gravitational center than at a longer distance. So stronger energy fields travel into the gravitational center. The gravitational center can bind other fields around it. Every time the gravitational center sends a gravitational wave, it makes space for other fields to travel into the gravitational center. 

Another way is that the gravitational center simply transports gravitational fields in a certain direction. In that model. Some string that can travel through the gravitational center can pull that field into one direction. The fact is this as long as a particle evaporates, that causes a gravitational effect. But when the particle’s evaporation ends. That causes the gravitational field will not pull particles and fields to the particle. When a particle evaporates or turns into a wave movement. It leaves space to other fields that try to fill that hole. That makes energy and particles travel to that gravity center. 

If we think that dark matter is the strange gravitational effect, we can think that there is some kind of lower energy point in those gravitational centers. That gravitational center can form when some kind of skyrmion, or some other thing, forms the lower energy point. Another thing that can form the strange gravitational effect called dark matter can be the skyrmion series. That can form around the quantum-sized black hole’s relativistic jet or relativistic string. Those skyrmions can move the quantum field like a piston. That can form an electromagnetic shadow behind those skyrmions. That means that other fields around those shadows or lower energy points start to fall into those electromagnetic vacuums. That thing makes a similar effect to gravity. 

And that point can be unbelievable. There is a possibility that free gravitons or free axions can form dark matter. But it is also possible that the dark matter is the condensed particles that are colder than 3K, or maybe those particles are colder than the energy minimum in the universe. That requires that those particles come from outside the universe. Or, that is the only explanation that could explain this hypothesis. 

See also

Gravitons

Skyrmions

Gravitational waves and quantum models.

Gravitational waves and quantum models. 

Gravitational waves are a wave movement or radiation. That moves gravitational fields. The problem with gravitational waves is how they can pull particles into the gravitational center. The answer can be that small strings can form those gravitational waves. Those small strings can spin in one direction, and that thing drives fields that the gravity wave penetrates to the gravity center. There is also a possibility that if the superstring theory is right, the waves or small skyrmions that travel at the superstring’s shell push those particles to the gravitational centers. Which one is the correct answer? 

That depends on the gravitational wave or wave structure’s position. If those waves are horizontally crossing the object, those strings can push fields through that structure that could look like a little bit of an egg cutter, where wires cut the egg in bites. In the second model, the string goes lengthwise through the object. In that case, when a black hole or the gravity center sends a gravity wave, it evaporates. In that case, the structure that evaporates pulls those strings into it. 

The gravity wave itself is like an energy ditch. That travels in space-time. The energy ditch forms when the G-(Gravity)field travels through other energy fields. That gravity field takes other fields with it. So the idea is similar to how some strings travel through the wave. If the string goes through the wave in the opposite direction, it pulls the wave energy into it. And if there is enough time, that string will turn wave backward. The gravity wave is a ditch in the energy field that travels to the gravity center. 

That makes energy travel faster to the gravity center. So how can energy travel in the wrong direction? The gravity wave is actually a stronger point in the gravity field. When the gravity center pulls other fields around it. Those fields pull particles with them. A gravitational wave is a space-time phenomenon. That which the field travels faster or carries particles stronger than otherwise. Or actually, gravity is waves. And gravity waves travel all the time across the universe. But sensors see only the strongest gravity waves. Those waves form when black holes collide. 

The Answer is in the field interaction. Every single fundamental interaction (electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force, gravity) is a wave movement. Otherwise, we can say that each fundamental interaction is like radiation. Every fundamental interaction has a unique wavelength in that radiation, or wave movement. So, when the black hole, or some other gravity center, sends gravity waves, it sends G-field waves. When those waves push the gravity field away. That causes the effect that other energy fields try to fill that hole. This thing causes an effect that we call gravity. 

Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

  Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

 

"Researchers believe that an odd pair of merging black holes first detected in 2019 were "dancing" around a third supersized singularity that was lurking in the background. (Image credit: CNAS/SHAO)" (LiveScience, Scientists think they detected the first known triple black hole system in the universe — and then watched it die)

       

Researchers believe. They found the first triple black hole system. And if that is true. It proves that black holes can form similar systems. To “regular”stars form. In some visions, black holes can form entire galaxies. Those three black holes are going to their end. There is one supermassive and two smaller black holes.  Black holes can hijack each other. Or massive stars in the same star system can form a group of black holes. A black hole’s relativistic jet can also press things like planets into black holes. There are no observations about that kind of black hole. But theoretically, high-energy jets can raise the energy level in the planet’s atmosphere so high that the energy in its atmosphere can press it into one entirety.     

Our understanding of black holes is continually expanding. Due to new observation models and fundamental mathematical and computational tools, such as quantum computers and AI, we can develop new models of the most fascinating phenomena in the universe. In the past, we thought that black holes were only destroyers. When information fell into a black hole. That means the information is gone forever. But today we think differently. The key element in quantum mechanics is that information cannot just vanish. Information can only change its form. A black hole  rolls information into it. In the yarn ball model, a black hole rolls information into its event horizon like the strings or wires. Those wires store information that the black hole releases as wave movement. 

When we look at the black hole’s event horizon, we would see that thing waving. When those waves move up and down, they send waves to space. When the wave pushes the quantum field around the event horizon and falls back, it leaves a small quantum vacuum between the event horizon. And the quantum field around it. That pulls energy or information out from the black hole. When a black hole's event horizon separates from the whirl around it, it allows it to send a wave burst. The black hole is an interaction. If the outside whirl that includes quantum fields and material is removed, the black hole will be destroyed. 

The black hole’s evaporation causes a similar effect to what ice makes when we transport it into the room. When a black hole evaporates, energy field. That comes from outside, try to fill that space. So what if black hole’s evaporation ends? What if a black hole sometimes reaches energy stability with space around it? That can cause a situation where energy or a quantum field don’tt move to the black hole. Or out of it. That thing can turn a black hole completely invisible. And that causes a wild theory that maybe dark matter could be black holes that almost reach energy stability with their environment. 

Black holes are like gravitational solitons. They are packed gravitational wave packages. Like impacting, identical laser beams or identical acoustic waves can form solitons. Gravitational waves that impact with each other can form a gravitational soliton. 

Today, we think that the black hole evaporates. In that process black hole releases information that is stored in the form of Hawking radiation. Or, in the form of gravitational waves. So can the black hole have hair? Maybe a black hole has so-called soft hair, or maybe it’s partially bald. The black hole’s hair means strings that transport information out from that structure. The black hole is not completely smooth. There are small hills and valleys in its structure. If a black hole were to be completely smooth, that means that it could not touch the fields around it. Those small hills and valleys would play an important role in black hole interactions. 

Those small hills and valleys form when a black hole forms. And supernova energy presses those particles into one entirety. Called a singularity. Electrons that orbit atoms will be smashed against the atom's nucleus. And they leave at the shell of that thing as the quantum-sized hills and valleys. There are also models where there are no singularities. Singularities can explain some black holes. Things like the Kugelblitz theory suggest. Black holes can form from the energy fields or wave movement. In that case, something starts to transport energy out from a certain point. And then energy or wave movement that comes from around tries to fill that point. This thing could prove superstring theory. 

That means black holes are like gravitational solitons. When gravity fields start to travel against each other. That effect locks wave movement in the gravitational wave soliton. Can that soliton be stable? That depends on the energy that whirls around it. If that gravitational soliton can form a whirl that is large enough that it cannot let energy or wave movement travel out from that soliton, that makes it stable. Maybe not all black holes are similar. Some of them might have a singularity. And some of them might not have that thing. Black holes are not destroyers. 

They store information in them. In new models, there can even be universes inside black holes. And in wildest models, our universe exists in a black hole. In this model, we cannot see the black hole’s event horizon because it's too far away. In some models, there is also a shockwave inside the event horizon that covers the event horizon itself. And when information travels through that event horizon, it stretches those waves. And anyway, the black hole is surrounded by a material disk. That covers things that are outside that thing. 

There is a possibility that our universe formed when a black hole from the previous universe detonated. Those new models are tools that can open the biggest mystery in the universe. Black holes can offer a solution for information paradoxes. And answer how the universe formed. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton