Reductionism can restore information.

Reductionism is seen in cases like puzzles. We can break puzzles into pieces and then remake the entirety. So if we have all the pieces of the puzzle, we can remake the puzzle even if we take some of those pieces to another side of the Earth. If we can transport those pieces back, that allows us to remake the puzzle. But that is possible only if those pieces are not destroyed. 

Reductionism can explain the whole universe. The idea in this thing is this: all systems have a limited number of particles, or some other actors. That means if we turn the system into turbulence or entropy, we might not recognize the system the same as it was before the process started. But the particles that create the system are the same. So theoretically, we can remake and reorder those particles into the same form and order that they were before the process started, without depending on the size of the system.

The requirement is that the system is stable. If we think of a situation, a tornado takes our puzzle with it, and we cannot remake it when it moves. We cannot remake or restore a system that we cannot touch. It’s impossible to restore the image or system. Even if it's small, if the system is full of turbulence and dirt. Also, we must know what the original image, or the system, looked like. And we must know what the pieces of the system look like. 

That means we can return the universe to the form that it was just after the Big Bang. Or maybe, if the universe is formed of the black hole that formed from the past universe’s remnants, if that universe that existed before our universe faced the Big Crunch. Theoretically. It is possible. To calculate information that remains in the superstrings that form all particles. The key element in the quantum theories, and especially quantum information theory, is that information cannot vanish. It can change its form. But it's possible to restore that information into its form. 

Above the light cone. 

In the light cone model, the giant black hole pressed and teleported information from another universe. The black hole focused information. And then acted like a camera obscura, the pinhole camera. This means if that model is true, the theoretical universe that existed before our universe was opposite to our universe. In the case that this hypothetical universe could transport information through the black hole. Acted as a pinhole camera. That information is stored in the superstrings. The information is in the wave form, but restoring it requires complete knowledge of the universe. And that thing can be the most fascinating thing in science. 

Reductionism makes it possible to transport at least data through the quantum wormholes. The data can be sent to the receiver through the quantum wormhole. And then the receiver will reorder those data bits into the original form. That allows the system to transport even humans. through the teleport, that is one name for the wormhole that tunnels data through it. The teleportation can happen without the need to transport the body physically. The system can send genetic information. And the human brain waves through the quantum channels. The receiver can create artificial DNA by using that data. And then create cell groups that the bioprinter uses to create a copy of the person. Or the system can transport a human atom by atom, and then reorder those atoms into the original form. That requires a very advanced technology. But maybe that thing is possible someday. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-reductionist/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop?

“A new tool, Effort.jl, is revolutionizing cosmology by letting scientists analyze enormous datasets quickly and accurately on a simple laptop. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, Researchers Have Discovered a Way To Simulate the Universe – on a Laptop)

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop? The answer lies in the accuracy the system employs. When we want to conduct. In a comprehensive analysis or simulation of the entire system, we must first select the scale at which we want to simulate it. If we want to make a simulation of the entire universe, we must begin with its smallest parts. In this case, we must only remember that the system's entirety is the sum of multiple subsystems. An atom, as an example, is the sum of electron shells and the nucleus. 

The nucleus of an atom is the sum of the protons and neutrons. And protons and neutrons are sums of quarks and gluons. We can make the simulation step by step. First, we can make a simulation of interactions. Between quarks and gluons. Then we can connect these simulations. Together with the proton and neutron interaction. 

And then we can make simulations. Of how electrons behave with each other and then how electron orbits interact with the atomic core. In this case, the system handles the entirety as modules. Each module handles each participant. The proton module involves the up and down quarks. Interaction with each other. This means that the system creates a mosaic where each participant of the structure is handled. Like an element. The system forms a bigger structure by connecting the smaller mosaic plates. The system makes a puzzle. Where each piece is a smaller-sized system. And together. Those smaller systems form a bigger entirety. 

If we want to calculate chemistry calculations. And to make simulations. Between molecules, we must not know quark interactions. We can choose the scale as atoms or atomic groups. To make simulations of their behaviors. In molecular-scale interactions. Those interactions happen in the farthest electron orbital. So we must not care. About the internal interactions of atoms. Removing. Unnecessary parts from the simulations. We can remove too high accuracy. 

That means we remove unnecessary parts of the system. If we want to drive from point A to point B. We want to know what route we choose. We don’t want to know what kind of houses or what kind of trees. Are in certain areas. We don’t need to know when every single person comes home. We must not know there is a free parking lot if we are on a transit journey. We need to know only which streets we select. This means the system must remove unnecessary information to make our work easier. So, the system gives only information. That we need. 

When we talk about accuracy. We can think that the system must control small points in the simulations. If we want to make a complete simulation of the universe and start from the quark-gluon levels, there are too many points that the system must handle.  We should begin those simulations from a much higher level. Like in the level of local galactic clusters. That means . We must make a model. Where the details in the entirety are lost. That allows us to handle things like galaxies as one point or entirety. 

If we want to simulate the interactions between galaxies. We must realize that there are billions of galaxies in the universe. That makes this type of simulation hard to make. There are billions of stars in each galaxy. And all giant spiral galaxies are following large groups of star clusters and dwarf galaxies. 

But it's possible to handle those systems as a whole. In that model. The system makes ball-shaped structures. There, it removes details. So the galaxies are like balls that interact with each other. But then there are still too many objects. That means we can make another crop. We can select certain galaxies whose interactions we can analyze. If we want to make a simulation. 

To determine how the Andromeda galaxy and the Milky Way will collide, we must calculate the route that those galaxies follow. There, we need to see the effect. The Magellanic Clouds affect that route. Calculating that three-body problem is possible, if we do not follow the highest accuracy. There is a possibility that Andromeda travels past the Milky Way. And then those galaxies start to orbit each other. Closing together. Then in the last stage, the supermassive black holes collide in the middle of the new galaxy. 

But if we want to make universe-scale simulations. We must use a different scale of accuracy. We must not calculate all electrons and each electron's trajectories. If we want to calculate things like how stars or interstellar nebulae behave. We must change the scale of accuracy. To make a large-scale simulation. We must understand that we can cut off atomic-scale objects. If we simulate large entireties. 

In universe-scale simulations, it's important. To determine the thing. What we want to simulate. If we want to simulate interactions between two galactic superclusters, we must not calculate the interactions of each single galaxy. We can think. That those galaxies and even local clusters are the entirety at the level of cosmic superclusters. We can think that. The superclusters are like balls. The giant entities where the local clusters form the mass centers. Or we can simply think. That they are like giant balls. That makes the simulation of the galactic superclusters' interactions easy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/researchers-have-discovered-a-way-to-simulate-the-universe-on-a-laptop/

Does the AI turn us passive?

The answer to that question is simple. The way we use AI determines whether it will make us more effective, smarter, or dumber. The thing that can turn an AI into a tool that destroys our ability to search for information. Write our essays, and make things. Is the way. To use AI. The AI can be like a mother, who always gives answers when the kid asks something. That thing can be effective. The problem is that the mother will not always stand next to the kids. And give answers to their questions. 

But the thing. That teaches a critical way to think and search for information is to give the encyclopedia to the kid, and then order them to search for the answer by themselves. 

The best way to destroy our productivity, thinking, and other things. It is to use the AI as a mother. In that case, we use AI like a child uses their parents. We can ask everything from the AI, and that makes us lazy. If we just ask things. From the AI. like “Write an essay for me, and mention things X,Y,and Z.” 

That thing can make this way of working effective. But it doesn’t make the essay-writing thing. That advances our way of thinking. In this case, we can compile the AI into a mother who writes essays to their kids. Those things might be impressive. If a 40-year-old person writes an essay. That a 10-year-old kid introduces as their own product. That essay can collect many prizes in a 10-year series, but that doesn’t advance the 10-year-old kid’s thinking. 

The thing that can destroy our ability to search for information is the need for effectiveness. When we write our essays, like this kind of text, we make them for ourselves. And of course, they are made for the audience. But those things require time. Time is money. And of course, we must write our essays in our free time. Companies pay for work. They pay for effectiveness. And that means we can turn the AI into a mother, who we can ask to make things like write essays and reports for our boss. 

We can use the AI as a mother who always gives answers to us. If we ask something. Or we can turn that tool into the melody mother, who always pleases the user, and tells things that the user wants to hear. We can give the AI the ability to think. But should we follow the instructions that the AI gives? Or should we just push the red button when the AI says that: “Press the red button”?

We say that we can use the AI as a mother. We can ask everything. From the AI. And that makes us effective. But that kind of mother. Kills our ability to search for information. Or, is it the AI’s fault if our boss gives an order to use the AI assistant in every situation? When we use the AI as some kind of mother. Who always gives answers all the time. When we ask something, we make a decision. We are people who use AI. We give orders to the algorithm. 

The algorithm is the system that searches, sorts, and outputs information. The decision on how to use AI is made by humans. If we give AI the authority to give orders to us, and we follow those orders, that decision is made by a human. We decide if we want to take orders from the AI. And if we don’t even check who owns some newspapers or TV channels, the decision is ours. 

But same way. Humans own the AI companies. They also make decisions about what the AI should tell and what it should not tell. Those people decide what they allow people to get, and what they are not allowed to get. 

The biggest failure that the user can make with the AI is not to use AI as some kind of mother, who tells everything that we want. We can turn the AI into a melody mother, who tells us what we want to hear. The problem with commercial AI is that it must be user-friendly. In some cases, the user-friendly can mean that the AI’s purpose is to please the user. That thing can tell. What the user wants to hear.  But, in this case. The people who make products. Have responsibility for their product. The AI tells only things. That it’s allowed to tell. The person who makes the algorithms determines those rules. 

About the segregation law of integers.

About the segregation law of integers. 

Can there be prime numbers in the group of integers? 

The segregation law means that all numbers can be divided into subsets. And this means that there cannot be a so-called prime number in the group of integers. The prime number is divisible only by one and itself. And that means an integer can be a prime number only if its divider is another integer. This means that, for example, 1, 2, and 3 are so-called virtual prime numbers. The reason for that is that we can divide those numbers into parts using decimal numbers. 

This means

1=0,5*2

1=0,25*4

1=0,05*20

but

1=0,0625*16 (0,25/4=0,0625) and (0,0625*16)

Let’s play with number 2

2=0,5*4

2=0,25*8

2=0,05*40

and

2=0,0625*32

And with 3

3=0,5*6

3=0,25*12

and

3=0,0625*48

So are 1,2, and 3 integers? The fact is that all numbers include one. And that means there are no real prime numbers in the group of integers. So, if we think like that, prime numbers are hiding on in the groups of decimal numbers. 

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop?

 How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop? 

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop? And can psychohistory be possible? 

The idea is this. If we want to simulate a large entirety, we must not have high accuracy. If we want to make a simulation about. How a river flows, we can use the entire river as a model. We must not care. About how a single water molecule or subatomic particle behaves. We must only know where the river flows. To make a prediction about how the river will flow, we must only know where the softest rock is to predict the channel that the river will choose. In meteorology, supercomputers can make very good predictions. If they know the forces that affect the air. In those cases, the system. Look at the entirety. It doesn’t try to make a precise and highly accurate model of how a single water droplet interacts. The system observes the large entireties. Like cloud groups to make a model, how the air mass will behave. 

Weather satellites and computers are good tools. To predict how large hurricanes behave. But those systems are helpless. When they must try to predict how tornadoes will form. Tornadoes are smaller but more destructive than large tropical storms. Tornadoes are too small for weather satellites.

Maybe. The same programs can make predictions of tornadoes. If the system uses so-called atmospheric satellites that observe smaller areas but with higher accuracy. Those systems will get information from smaller areas. But they can use similar computer systems. Researchers used to make a large-scale weather forecast. In this case, it's easy to make a planet-scale weather forecast. But those forecasts are inaccurate. 

In the same way, it's easy to make predictions about how large gas mass behaves. The system removes unnecessary accuracy and handles things like galaxies as solid forms. Those are like pins in the large system. Or maybe we should say that galaxies are like wheels. Those wheels move wave movement, fields, and large material masses over the universe. 

That means if we make inaccurate, “about” predictions. About how large gas masses are. Like galactic superclusters behave, we can make that prediction using laptop computers. In an inaccurate model, we can think that galactic superclusters are the wheels, and the universe is like a ball around those wheels. When the system starts to simulate how the galaxies behave in a local cluster. The system uses the local cluster as a scale, and galaxies are wheels. When the system makes a model of how a galactic supercluster behaves, the local clusters are the wheels. And the last version is the universal scale. The galactic superclusters are the wheels. In the large-scale simulations. The system doesn’t notice or filter out too small actors that have no visible effect on the system. 

This system is called. A variable scale model. The idea is similar to the U.S map. If we want to look at the overview of the weather over the USA. We can use the USA as a whole. But if we want to see what the weather is over in Montana. We can take a Zoom image of the state of Montana. We can use the same computer algorithms in that area. As in larger-scale images. But the higher accuracy means that we lose the entirety. 

Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906), Austrian physicist

Can the psychohistory turn true? 

There is a possibility that the same models. Those used for simulating the universe can be used to predict how humans behave. That is called psychohistory. In the SciFi series: “The Foundation”. The idea is that the system predicts the behavior of large human groups. The system uses large human groups. And things like their states’ influence as variables that can predict how people behave. The system makes models. Using billions of people. But if that thing is possible. The system can use the same algorithms for smaller groups. 

In psychohistory, the system looks at things. That happened in the past. Then the system searches for what those things caused. And then. The system searches for details of similar events from its environment. Because people with similar personalities should behave in similar ways in similar situations. So, the system must know. How many certain types of personalities live in an area that faces certain changes? We can think. Human groups have a certain social or psychological mass, and if a certain number of people start behaving in certain ways. That psychological mass can start to pull other people with it, only if it's large enough.

The thing that causes panic is that a certain number of people in a group start to panic. When we think that four people start to panic, that might not seem like a very big thing. But if there are 10 people in one room. And there is one square meter of space. For each person. Then four people will get the larger effect. And one of those reasons is that. There is no outside effect that can suppress the panic effect. And that makes it stronger. If the head of state goes into panic, that can escalate into a very large group. If one single person goes into panic, that has no such effect. 

And then to psychohistory: can we predict how people or nations behave? Every person. With a certain personality. Behaves in certain ways. The thing that makes predictions hard. Is that. We should know. What a person’s personality is. And that’s impossible if the researchers don’t know the entire personal history of the person. 

We can take the scale of millions or billions of people. When we think about psychology and economics. There are inaccuracies. The reason for those inaccuracies is that we don’t know every person’s background. People’s experiences model our behavior. Psychological models are almost right. And they work with most people. But those models are not working with people. Whose nature is not known. We don’t know what type of humans they are if we don’t know that person’s complete history. The personality is unknown, if there is something hidden in history. 

But there should be a certain number of  non-predicted cases. Or a certain type of standard deviation  of cases that behave in a non-predictable way. This means that large, scalable surprises are not very common cases. in large-scale models. Cases like the Kennedy assassination are very rare. They are like black swans, possible but extremely rare things. There must be an acceptable  error level in all models. Some of those black swans can be predicted. We can calculate the possibilities of asteroid hits, but there is a possibility. That some asteroids can come through the defense. Sometimes asteroids are seen. Only when they pass Earth and those things cause problems. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-found-a-way-to-simulate-the-universe-on-a-laptop/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_temperature_and_pressure

Does spacetime (or, space-time) exist?

 Does spacetime (or, space-time) exist? 

"Exploring different approaches to understanding space-time deepens our understanding of reality. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, Does Space-Time Really Exist?)

"Is time something that flows — or just an illusion? Exploring space-time as either a fixed “block universe” or a dynamic fabric reveals deeper mysteries about existence, change, and the very nature of reality."(ScitechDaily, Does Space-Time Really Exist?)

Does spacetime exist? Does the space have time? We know the thing. Called material time. That time is seen in material evaporation. Because of the expansion of the universe. That thing causes an effect that all material turns into a wave movement. 

In the five-dimensional cosmological model, there are three spatial dimensions. And two dimensions in time.  Those two dimensions are time that goes forward and time that travels backward. In that model, time is one of the fundamental interactions. The idea in the spacetime model is that the Big Bang released material in time. Or it separated time and material. In this case. We talk about material evaporation. The model goes like this. The universe formed from a so-called Kugelblitz black hole. When the whirl started to collect energy in the proto-universe, it formed the black hole. Straight from that energy field that condensed into the black hole. When that black hole evaporated or detonated. That formed an event called the Big Bang. 

That means there is space formed between superstrings that will form the first particles. In that model, the superstring is an extremely thin energy field that turns into fermions and bosons. Superstrings are not single things. They are complicated internal structures. And in black holes, those superstrings are in such a tight form that they have no space to oscillate. That space caused an effect that those superstrings started to send sub-waves. When a superstring oscillates, it sends part of itself into its environment. This event would be similar to the material evaporation. 

When there is no energy that can resist the superstring, it sends the sub-string. In the same way as material, the existence, thickness, or number of structures in a superstring depends on the field that resists the superstring. The ten-dimensional superstring model explains the universe and space as an endless number of superstrings. The density or number of those superstrings in the space determines the strength of the field. When there are lots of strings in a small area, that means the field is strong. 

The main question in time dilation is this: Does that effect only push energy into particles? Or, does that affect cause a situation where the particle travels in time? 

Above: The 2D model of the gravity center. The gravity center packs energy fields around it. That forms a denser energy area. The gravity makes a pothole, but it also packs energy fields around the gravitational center. 

This denser, or higher energy area causes the effect that energy transfer to the environment slows down. And that slows material evaporation. If the difference between energy levels in the material and the environment is high. The energy level around the particle is very low. That raises the speed of energy flow out from the particle. The same effect can cause superstrings to decay just as matter. 

And that means the superstring model tells us that the spacetime should exist. When a gravity field forms, the gravity center rolls the field of those superstrings to the gravitational center. That effect is seen as a whirl in the universe. Those whirls can be extremely large. And all spiral galaxies are whirls that form around the supermassive black holes. Those whirls pull back, and without them, the black hole in the center of the galaxy will be detonated. 

And then we go to the spacetime. The idea in spacetime is this: energy fields or wave movement are everywhere. Those energy fields can condense into material. Because of the Schwinger effect. The Schwinger effect forms elementary particles, fermions. And bosons. In a similar way. The Schwinger effect explains the Kugelblitz black hole as a structure. Where the whirl will collect the energy fields or strings into one point. When there is enough field. Packed into one point. It creates a strong gravity effect that pulls everything into it. Without that whirl, the energy that is stored in a black hole is released. The whirl is the thing. That keeps the black hole in its form. 

We can think that when time moves from the past to the future, that thing looks a little bit like a superstring. When those time strings or “arrows of time”, or “time arrows” (Time’s arrow)move, they push time back around them. So when the arrow of time moves forward, that moves other arrows backward. If one of the arrows of time moves faster than the other arrow of time. That faster time arrow slows the slower arrows of time. The reason for that is that the time arrow moves energy into those other arrows of time. 

The arrow of time, along with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, explains that when gravity turns so strong that the escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. That means time starts to travel backward. The black holes will pump energy into the past if that model is right. And that energy is released at the point where a black hole forms. But the question is, does that thing really happen? Or does the black hole only store information and release it when it evaporates? This is the thing. That makes supernovae interesting. 

Theoretically, it is possible to decode the information that the black hole released. And there is a possibility. A black hole drives information straight into the point where. The black hole formed, and that point is the supernova explosion. Where the black hole got its beginning. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/argument-against-theory-of-everything/

https://scitechdaily.com/does-space-time-really-exist/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

Alien civilizations again and again.

 Alien civilizations again and again. 

“New simulations suggest the Galactic Habitable Zone isn’t fixed: when stars migrate across the Milky Way, the odds of rocky, potentially temperate worlds, especially in the outer disk, can rise markedly. Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, Our Galaxy’s Sweet Spot for Life Is Bigger Than We Thought)

There is a possibility that NASA’s Perseverance rover found some kind of bacterial remnants on Mars. There was an ocean in the northern hemisphere. Then the planet froze, lost its atmosphere. And then the UV radiation destroyed the water. The reason for that can be the lack of a magnetic field. It’s possible that the chaotic magma structure explains that thing. When Mars faced its last catastrophe, the impact could break its core. And that caused the loss of the magnetic field. 

And then to aliens. 

This discussion begins every autumn. Are we alone in the Universe? The answer is this: until aliens call, we are alone. The only fact that we have is that nobody answered. Or nobody made contact outside Earth. Or there are no confirmed alien technosignals. This means that we might be alone in our galaxy, or there can be one or more other civilizations. And maybe some civilizations are already destroyed, because they failed the ultimate test. That failure can be the civil war. 

Or it can be an overestimation of one's own technical skills. In some models. Pre-Kadashev-scale civilization can test things like an antimatter rocket. And then there will be some leak in the capsule. That causes annihilation that can destroy the entire planet, in this case. The civilization that reaches the Kardashev-scale 1 starts to build an antimatter rocket that can give them access to the entire solar system. Then there is a leak in the antimatter capsule. But then. We must realize a couple of things. 

“Longstanding model of the Galactic habitable Zone, which is estimated to exist between 7-9 kiloparsecs from the center of the galaxy. However, recent research calls this into question.” Credit: NASA/Caltech. (ScitechDaily, Our Galaxy’s Sweet Spot for Life Is Bigger Than We Thought)

When we talk about aliens. First, intelligent aliens are different from techno-aliens and primitive life forms. A water planet can host lifeforms. Those lifeforms will not be intelligent. Those lifeforms can be something that lives in their seas. Those creatures could be some kind of bacteria. Or algae. Another thing is intelligence. Without a certain type of atmosphere, that alien race cannot make fire, and they require that skill to  melt metals. There is a possibility that the first humans melted metals in volcanoes or lava. But this method uses a natural heat source. It is not as simple a method for melting metals as using fire. 

As the fire that those aliens can make using matches or friction. Intelligence doesn’t mean that a creature turns technical. Or it can form a technical civilization. If the star that they orbit is too heavy and too bright. That makes the star too short-lived for the creature to form anything technical. Also, it's possible that the black holes or some nova or supernova explosion near the civilization’s own star sterilizes their planet, or there is a possibility. that their own planet is metal-poor. That means there are no metals. There are millions or even billions of things that can go wrong before civilization can fly to the stars. 

The planet can travel too close to Sagittarius A, and near the center of galaxies, the radiation can destroy those planets. There is a so-called habitable area in a galaxy. And at that zone, stars are mature enough that planetary systems can form around them. Those planets must be solid, and their trajectories must be stable enough. There must not be a large number of roving pieces. Those pieces can destroy the planet and its lifeforms. 

“Electron microscopy revealed chain structures resembling living organisms in meteorite fragment ALH84001” (Wikipedia, Allan Hills 84001)

And that civilization requires the will to make technical things. Without motivation, those creatures will never fly to space or stars. Or without the need, evolution will not favor things like intelligence. Without catastrophes, the creatures will not rise out of the oceans. They will not require brains or high-level intelligence. 

The locked planets around K-type stars might not be suitable for lifeforms. But those locked planets can offer a place for a technically advanced civilization. To make its stand. That thing means that a locked planet offers unlimited solar power to that civilization or its base. Those creatures can use protective suits and live under domes that help them to protect themselves against those red dwarfs' flares. That kind of case requires. The red dwarf is quite close to the alien solar system, or orbits it. Sometimes we should ask what our technology looks like. If we had a red dwarf at the same distance as Proxima Centauri orbits Alpha Centauri. 

The fact is that Earth is the only planet with confirmed lifeforms. But it’s possible. That there was some kind of microscopic life on Mars. Before that planet froze, lost its atmosphere, and the UV radiation destroyed water molecules. 

There are some stones that support the Martian lifeforms.  Their problem is that they were found on Earth. The Allan Hills 84001 (ALH84001) meteorite from the South Pole involves structures. That could confirm life on Mars. But the problem is that those bacteria-shaped structures can have an origin on Earth. The South Pole is not cold enough. That it could keep that meteorite sterile. There is a possibility that those. Probably lifeforms that left their markings on the shell of Allan Hills 84001. It can come from Earth. Maybe those primitive creatures felt the heat of that meteorite. And traveled to it. Those strange forms look like primitive creatures. Like rod-shaped cyanobacteria or small tubeworms. 

“NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover took this selfie, made up of 62 individual images, on July 23, 2024. A rock nicknamed “Cheyava Falls,” which has features that may bear on the question of whether the Red Planet was long ago home to microscopic life, is to the left of the rover near the center of the image. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS. NASA’s Perseverance rover has identified its most compelling evidence yet for ancient microbial life on Mars.” (ScirchDaily, NASA Perseverance Rover’s Stunning Find May Be Mars’ First Sign of Life)

The question of life in the cosmos is more complicated than we even thought. NASA’s Perseverance Mars vehicle found promising structures on Mars that look like bacteria or their remnants. The thing is that. Those forms in stones look like bacteria, or their remnants. But that doesn’t make them bacteria. But as we know. Perseverance found a sign that could be the first sign. Or strong evidence of life on another planet. 

The Artist’s impression of an alien city. 

So they might not prove anything. In one way or another. The problem is that even those things can be some kind of bacteria. They can arrive from the Earth, with some meteorites or with probes that are not properly disinfected. 

The biggest problem with alien hunting is that nobody has officially seen aliens. There is no confirmed alien DNA. Or confirmed alien cells. This means researchers cannot even know. What they should try to find. Searching for an alien civilization is not searching for a needle in a haystack. It's more difficult. There are as many variables that make models for techno civilizations, or their location is impossible to determine. The techno civilization can be something other than we think it is. Even if those civilizations use microwave ovens, we might not detect those signals. Or maybe we don’t separate those signals from natural microwave signals. We don’t even know if they use radio as data transmission. Or maybe those other civilizations do not exist. 

Existence is a remarkable thing for those civilizations. The civilization that doesn’t answer does not exist. And maybe we don’t want that answer. There is always a possibility that those civilizations are too far away that us cannot hear their radio signals. Another thing is that we are between the Milky Way’s spiral structure. That means we might be a cosmic Eastern island. And maybe we are lucky. 

https://scitechdaily.com/our-galaxys-sweet-spot-for-life-is-bigger-than-we-thought/

https://scitechdaily.com/nasa-perseverance-rovers-stunning-find-may-be-mars-first-sign-of-life/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001

Unpredictable actions make human behavior hard to predict.

  Unpredictable actions make human behavior hard to predict. 

"To be, or not to be" 

98% of generative AI projects fail. The reason for that is that researchers try to replace humans. But is this the only thing that causes failures? Another thing that can cause failure is this: people try to use AI for purposes. There, it cannot operate. When we think. About those cases, there is always a possibility that people misunderstand. Things about what they should do. There is a possibility that people try to use AI as a tool that makes something impossible. And one of those things is. To use the AI. To make predictions about economics. 

Economics, psychology, and sociology are not exact sciences like mathematics and physics. The AI can calculate things like the energy levels of particles quite easily. If it knows all quantum fields. And all other things. That interacts with that thing. A psychological effect. Makes it impossible to make predictions about the economic advances. Human behavior is unpredictable. When we go out and say. We go for a walk. For 30 minutes. But we might not do that thing. 

Feelings and imagination are things. That allows us to make unpredictable things. 

We should always react to similar stress in similar ways. But we use only successful ways to respond to the challenges. If we don’t get successful feedback. We change the method. How to respond to the challenge. Every action that we do is a small challenge. When we cross the road, there is always a possibility that a car will hit us. When we walk to the shop, there is always a possibility that we slip on the icy street. That’s why there must be an alternative route. 

There is always a possibility that a burglar breaks into the shop, and the police keep the shop closed. Or the milk car can have an engine failure. Causing a lack of milk in the shop. Most everyday challenges involve a risk of injury. Or even die. If we cannot act right. If we just run to the road. Without caring about anything, there is a possibility that we run straight under the car. 

We can make a U-turn just outside the door and walk back in. We can change our direction for any visible reason. The reason why we make that U-turn could be that we just want to turn around. When a particle turns its direction, there must be some outside reason. The behavior of the particles and radiation is predictable. If we know the entirety. And the thing that makes us unpredictable is feelings. If we feel that we cannot accept something, we don’t do that thing, even if our sense says something else. 

This makes things like economics hard to predict. We should have knowledge of how certain persons react. In certain situations. But the problem is that we cannot know everything that the person faced during their life. And those missing parts can be the most. important things for that person. This is why it’s hard to predict how people react in certain situations. 

One of the reasons why behavior models are failing is that people hide data. Making predictions of the behavior of large groups of humans is much easier. When the group that AI uses grows. That means that the accuracy in the behavior of those people increases. But when we try to predict the behavior of a single person. We must collect all the data of them. We can see from that data how a person reacts to certain situations. If that person faces a similar situation. We can predict when. That person faces a similar situation again. That person will always act in a similar way in all similar situations if the way the person used was successful. 

The thing that makes us unpredictable gives us a big advantage over our competitors. The ability to make unpredictable moves and solutions makes predators hard. To track. And hunt us down. This is the ultimate ability in nature. Abstract thinking is the tool. That gives us the ability to make plans. That gives us the ability to operate unpredictably. 

What was before the Big Bang (Part II)

 What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

"Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time. Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin. Physicists in Canada propose that our universe could be a reflection of an antimatter universe that existed before the Big Bang." (CREDIT: Getty Images)" The brighter side, Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin)

The antiuniverse or antiverse is the model. That is based on the supernova explosion model. When a large star explodes, that event forms a so-called time-glass nebula. So, could the Big Bang event have formed the two universes? The idea is that when two giant whirls. That spin was opposite. Those giant whirls formed the spark, or the explosion that sent two universes into different directions. If those proto-anti-universe and the proto-universe impacted. That could form the universe and the anti-universe. 

This question is one of the most interesting, because it helps researchers to calculate the values of the particles.  When a particle travels through the universe. Energy and quantum fields touch it. Those touches leave marks on those particles. And that helps to get information from distant galaxies. But this is not possible. If researchers don’t know the strength of those energy fields. This means that modeling the Big Bang makes it possible to calculate changes in the energy levels in an expanding universe. 

  

What energy should be in those particles that exist in the modern universe? 

And if researchers can calculate. What kind of energy should those particles have? They can search for differences between theoretical and real values. That gives data about the fields. That the particle faced. During its journey.  But it’s impossible to calculate theoretical values without knowing the beginning values. 

Was there some kind of energy flow that formed two opposite rotating whirls that were positive and negative (+ and -) universes? And was the Big Bang some kind of spark between those giant whirls?  That doesn’t mean that antiversum and universe require material. They require opposite fields that cause a similar reaction to the antimatter-matter annihilation. 

In some models, the energy arrow that traveled through the field formed two giant whirls. Those whirls can be the anti-universe and the universe. Or, those whirls were the positive and negative whirls. If those two positive and negative proto-universes act like matter and antimatter. They can pull each other together. 

Above: Time glass nebula. 

So can the antiverse explain the Big Bang? 

In this case, we should rather talk about the antiverse. As a mirror universe. Or, mirror protouniverse . Where there was some kind of material. We could say that in the case of the proto-universe, the antiversum was rather the whirl where energy fields rotate in the opposite direction. Than the other universe that we can call the “normal universe”. If the proto-universe and proto-anti-universe were oppositely rotating whirls in the energy field or in free gravitational wave movement. We can think that those whirls pulled each other together like antimatter and matter. Pulled each other together. 

It’s possible that those extremely large rotational whirls impact each other, and they formed the lightning or the spark. That spark could be like a shortcut between positive and negative fields, and that spark could be the thing that we can call the universe. When the Big Bang happened. Energy was homogenously spread through the entire universe. Then the universe's expansion made holes. In that homogenous energy field. And that caused situations where energy started to fill those holes. 

Could dark energy or some part of dark energy form when quarks or gluons collide with their antimatter pairs? That thing can mean that this kind of thing can put energy into moving. 

Can black holes’ relativistic jets be formed from new fermions in the universe? When we talk about black holes and their relativistic jets, they can form fermion-anti-fermion pairs. That means that effect condenses energy fields into the form of matter. That means if Schwinger effect forms matter in the modern universe, that thing forms fermion-antifermion pairs. And those particle-antiparticle pairs can annihilate, transforming into energy. So could dark energy’s source be in the quark and anti-quark annihilation? Or in some more exotic particles, annihilation, like the gluon-antigluon annihilation. 

This can mean that energy, or wave movement that travels into those energy holes, is stated to fill those holes, and the Schwinger effect could form material in those whirls. Some of those whirls could be so strong that the wave movement formed different-sized primordial black holes. The question is always. Do black holes' relativistic jets form new particles in the universe? Relativistic jets are the most powerful things in the universe. Because black holes also interact with dark matter and dark energy. That means a black hole can form two relativistic jets, visible and dark energy jets.    

When dark energy jets travel through the universe, they can turn dark energy fields into some kind of particles. The changes in dark energy could form. When dark energy turns into some kind of particles. When we think about the nature of energy, matter is one of the forms of energy. Particles are energy packages. When energy binds itself into matter or particles, that means that energy is away from its environment. 

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/groundbreaking-research-suggests-that-our-universe-has-an-antiuniverse-twin/

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.amp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system.

  Futuristic journey to the Proxima Centauri system. 

A hypothetical journey to Alpha Centauri, or actually to Proxima Centauri, will be the thing that changes our view of the universe and ourselves. The film introduces three types of spacecraft. The Millennium ship, the cryostatic ship, and the WARP ship. The WARP ship is not yet possible. In some models, the unmanned, small-sized WARP probes use miniature black holes as a power source and for quantum communication. Those systems travel first to other solar systems to search for a possible habitable planet. 

The next step is the cryostatic crew. That travels to the targeted solar system as a vanguard. Whose mission is to prepare the base for the main group of colonists who travel to that solar system in the generation ships. Those generation ships are the giant metal cathedrals that can reach a speed. Of about 2-5% of the speed of light. The WARP system is the only thing. That can take the crew back from the Alpha Centauri system while their sender is alive. The journey to Alpha Centauri takes hundreds of years. 

The biggest problem with the journey to Alpha Centauri is that when we send crew to that mission, they cannot return. That means those people are gone forever. The cryoship reaches 20-50% of the speed of light. That speed is very slow in the universe, and that means, even if we make a cryoship, we would send those people on the mission. where we don’t meet those people again. The cryostatic system denies aging, and those people can return from their mission, but the Earth has changed while they were on their journey. And there is no one left from the team that sent those operators on their journey. 

AI-made inspiration details about the hypothetical  Proxima B base. That base looks like the Moonbase. Its mission would be to protect the crew against the Proxima superflares, extreme weather, and possible. micro-organisms. Because there is always an epidemiological risk. Those structures must be separated. The bubble protects the crew against superflares. The base could be underground, and that thing could be the airlock and observation station. 

The generation ship will be the thing that transports the main groups of colonists. That craft needs generations to travel to Alpha Centauri. Those colonists who arrive at the Alpha Centauri system will never see Earth. That means Earth is a distant thing to those colonists. When we think about a situation where the generation ship is an artificial world. That slowly travels between solar systems; there is a big difference between that artificial world and a real planet. The environment in the artificial world is fully controlled. There are very carefully controlled microbes and temperatures on board the generation ship. Those systems are urgent because their mission is to deny. The artificial ecosystem's collapse. 

When colonists land on Proxima Centauri B or some other planet in that planetary system. There are artificial wombs and advanced nanotechnology that allow the creation of artificial DNA. And those systems create artificial people who could operate at the surface of Proxima Centauri B or other planets in that solar system. 

There is the natural environment. Winds, rain, and sunlight. There can also be natural microbes on that strange world. When that crew lands on that planet, they must live in the bubble. The base is isolated from the environment. The base’s mission is to protect those colonists against the Proxima super flares, storms, and the heat or extreme low temperature on that locked planet. Those colonists require protective suits if they travel on that planet. Because superflares raise the temperature very fast. The base can be in underground tunnels. That protects the colonists better. The Proxima would always be in the same position, because the planet is locked. 

Time and the Big Bang theory.

Time and the Big Bang theory. 

Maurits Escher's portrait "Ascending and Descending" can introduce a situation where particles move between energy levels. When another particle moves up, that pushes another particle to move into a lower energy level. If two particles move up and one particle is between them, they move that one particle back or to a lower energy level faster. 

So if the case is this. When one particle moves one energy step up. The neighbour particle must move one step down.. And, if that particle is between two particles that move one step up. That particle that goes down should move two steps down. 

The reason for that is this: when one particle moves into an upper energy level, it gets that energy from the particle that moves to the lower energy level. And if the particle "wants" to push two particles to the upper energy level, it must release twice as much energy as one particle requires. In the same way, if two particles step down in the energy level and there is a particle between them, that causes a situation where those two particles release energy. They push the particle between them two steps higher. 

In one dark energy model. The reason for dark energy is that some particles just release their energy too fast. The idea is similar to the waterfall. When water drops from the slopes, it forms a sound when it hits the bottom. That sound forms when water releases its energy. The fact is that water releases part of its energy into the air. While water molecules travel in the air, they form friction. 

And that friction means that water released some part of its kinetic energy. Transforms into thermal energy. But what if water falls in the vacuum? In that case, falling water would not release its kinetic energy to the air. That means water transfers more kinetic energy to the bottom. And that means water would be at a higher energy level than it would be if it traveled through the air. 

Energy requires a place where it can move. When a particle travels through the universe, it interacts with its environment. That means a particle receives or releases energy. If a particle cannot transfer its energy to somewhere, like another particle or a quantum field, it remains higher energy than it should be. 

Can that thing be the evidence of the wormholes? The wormhole would not let the particle release its energy. And that can explain why some particles are at a higher energy level than calculated. The reason for that higher energy level can be that the particle traveled across the magnetic storm. And that tells us that the sun's magnetic storms can load more energy into particles than they should carry. 

But when a particle comes out from that magnetic effect, it causes a situation where energy flows faster from those particles than it should. In the same way, when particles come out of the hypothetical wormhole, that means they are at a higher energy level than they should be. And that causes a similar situation. The particle releases its energy faster than it should. That kind of effect can rip particles into pieces. 

Above: "A depiction of a universe-antiuniverse pair. Credit: Wikipedia, CC" (Phys.org, New model suggests partner anti-universe could explain accelerated expansion without the need for dark energy)

The Big Bang was an event, or a series of events. Big Bang released into time. The idea of that model is this. There are four dimensions: three in space and two in time. The Schwinger effect formed matter straight from wave movement. Before the Big Bang, there was wave movement. Or, some quantum points, or quantum dots, in that spacetime. It's possible that those quantum dots were small whirls in the starting field. Then those quantum dots started to assemble a wave movement around them.

It's possible that the event that formed the universe actually formed two universes. There is a formed universe where we live. And the universe, there at least, is the mirror. So, in the anti-universe, the matter is antimatter, but some cosmologists believe that time also moves oppositely. 

The Universe formed from a starting field that could be the gravitational wave movement fields. When we think about a model, the Schwinger effect or quantum whirls form the universe. We can think of a situation. There was a fast-moving energy impulse, or energy arrow, that traveled through the starting field. That energy arrow should form two arrows. And this model supports the antiverse model. 

Or in some other models, the quantum dots moved away. From each other because of some quantum mechanical impact. That thing moved quantum fields away from each other. And then they tried to fill that hole. This means that the starting field started to form. A tower-type structure, and sooner or later, that field couldn't keep the tower in its form. That collapse was the thing. Called the Big Bang.  Or it started a series of events that we call the Big Bang. 

There is a model that the spacetime is actually formed of the internally traveling time arrows. Time moves forward at the outer layer of that time arrow. The internal structure of the time arrow moves backward in time. The idea is that. We live in the third dimension, and the material's base energy level. At the quantum state is a 2D material. This forms the second dimension. Energy travels out from the material. 

Above: Waterfall. The sound of falling water forms when water releases its kinetic energy. (Pinterest)

This means. The material turns into a "flat" form. Or the material turns into a 2D form.  So the form of the universe can be a giant sobrero. There is a similar structure. Like a plasma impact wave that surrounds our solar system, we cannot get information from outside the universe. That shockwave formed during the Big Bang travels at the forward edge of the universe. And it denies getting information from outside the universe. There can also be a gravity wave traveling ahead of the Universe, that closes the universe inside the gravity sphere. And it also denies gravity observations from outside the universe. 

But let's go back. The internal time arrows. The idea is this. When the time arrow, or arrow of time, moves forward, it pushes things around it back in time. There is a possibility that the universe or material is the structure that acts as a hollow time arrow. The hollow time arrow forms when the edges of the structure travel forward in time. And they push their internal structures back in time. 

This model can work with the 3D spacetime model. If there is a structure, then the outer edge pushes energy into the middle of it, which means that the energy falls straight into the second dimension. That causes an effect where energy starts to spread around. But because there is a structure that transports energy into that point, the structure forms the standing wave into the second dimension. That means. There forms the structure. That looks like a volcano. Energy falls in the middle of it. 

That wave movement releases energy. That energy impacts the energy that comes outside, which starts to raise the structure's energy level. And because that field travels up those fields, it binds energy into them. The outside energy impacts the inner structure, which transmits energy to the second dimension. And that forms the energy trap or standing wave around the structure. The standing wave's energy level rises outward, or the inward field gives in and falls on the structure. 

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.html

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-the-big-bang-wasnt-the-beginning-supercomputers-search-for-clues/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

AI and the end of the world.

   AI and the end of the world. 

The end of the world can start. When the AI-controlled defense systems start to use weapons in a crisis.  In simulations. AI used weapons more sensitive than humans. This means that the AI is not suitable for making decisions in cases where the crisis has not yet escalated. Into weapon use. The AI can choose nuclear weapons more often than humans in those simulations. Here we can see one of the most frightening. And at the same time, interesting ways in which AI “thinks” about those simulations. 

The AI takes those simulations as a chess game or some other game. And the AI’s goal is to win the game. That means the AI takes the most effective and powerful weapons. Another thing is that the AI always selects the easiest models that are possible. There is one big difference between humans and AI. That difference is that the AI doesn’t think like we do. The AI doesn’t care about human victims. 

The only goal that the system has. It is to win the game. The AI plays these kinds of strategic simulations like it plays regular games. In the same way as some Atari chess simulations, the AI has certain points in losses when it takes a nuclear arsenal to use. When the AI reached a certain level of losses. It saw that it needed more firepower. The problem with the simulations is that they are never. Like real people. 

Simulating real crises is a little bit more difficult to create. Than some shooting games. Those systems require psychological aspects. The thing that causes uncertainty in those simulations is that AI or any human participants in those simulations don’t think like Putin or Trump. They don’t know how big a price real leaders are willing to pay. The lack of a psychological aspect is the thing. That causes problems with the AI. The AI plays to win the game, and the clearest way. To win the game is to destroy the opponent. This is the thing that causes very big problems. If somebody wants to negotiate, the AI will not recognize that action. 

There is a possibility that AI attacks anyway, because it analyzes actions that somebody plays over time and position to make an attack. The AI analyzes games like this: the side that has fewer points or units is losing. And that means the AI doesn’t think of casualties, like humans. It only thinks that the opponent must have fewer points. This makes AI dangerous. If it translates to negotiations and withdrawal causes a loss of points. That makes the AI attack enemies. The AI makes those things because it is programmed to keep its own points higher than its opponent's points. And that can cause a catastrophe in real life. 

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/09/02/pentagon-ai-nuclear-war-00496884

Can we ever create a Theory of Everything?

   Can we ever create a Theory of Everything? 

"One of the most popular efforts toward a Theory of Everything is string theory, where the Lie Group E8 x E8 is shown here: one realization of 10-dimensional superstring theory. The number of particles, fields, interactions, and dimensions that must be removed to keep the predictions of this overarching framework consistent with what we observe in our Universe is overwhelming, and represents more than 95% of the theory's general predictions." (Big Think, The argument against the existence of a Theory of Everything)

Can we ever create a Theory of Everything? The answer is that the thing requires long-term observations from interstellar and intergalactic space. When we are in the middle of the system, it’s impossible to see the global entirety. We see local entirety, but we cannot see the entire or global scale. In the system. To see the entire system, we must step outside it. We cannot see global phenomena in the universe. In the same way, we cannot see an object’s place if we see the object's speed. So we cannot measure a particle’s place. And the momentum. 

That is a big question. And the answer is that the Theory of Everything, TOE, requires that researchers know every single actor in the universe. That means that we must have knowledge of the internal structures of atoms. We must also have knowledge of the wave movement interactions and behavior at all scales of the universe. That means we must expand our knowledge very much. If we want to make a formula. That introduces all interactions from gluons to galactic superclusters. The biggest problem is this. We don’t have knowledge of what happens in interstellar space. 

All information that we get from space outside the solar system is distorted. That means. Information that we get travels across the heliopause, asteroid belts, and then through the solar wind that travels against it. That thing causes an effect on that information, and we can say that this information is dirty. When information travels into the Milky Way from other galaxies, that information travels through the Milky Way’s own radiation layers.  Another thing that can cause problems with measurements is things that we cannot see, such as typical objects. Maybe. Our star is not as typical a G-2 star as we want to believe. The solar system. Where we live is actually between the Milky Way’s spiral branches. The local group there is a certain type of actor that might have a unique structure. That means rare objects can form almost homogenous groups, but those objects might not be typical on a global scale. 

**********************************************************

"Top: Diagram of the heliosphere as it travels through the interstellar medium:"

"Heliosheath: the outer region of the heliosphere; the solar wind is compressed and turbulent"

"Heliopause: the boundary between the solar wind and interstellar wind where they are in equilibrium."

"Middle: water running into a sink as an analogy for the heliosphere and its different zones (left) and Voyager spacecraft measuring a drop of the solar wind's high-energy particles at the termination shock (right)"

"Bottom: Logarithmic scale of the Solar System and Voyager 1's position." 

(Wikipedia, Heliosphere)

**********************************************************

That means there is less gas and dust around our solar system than around stars that are in spiral branches.  Otherwise, there are fewer stars around the sun than around stars that are in the spiral branches. There is also a possibility that the Milky Way and its companion galaxies are in the cosmic void. That means Milky Way. And their companion galaxies have  lots of cosmic dust from their environment. This means that the dust and gas around those galaxies, and especially around their black holes, might be denser than researchers believed. But otherwise, gas and dust outside galaxies and dwarf galaxies might be thinner than researchers thought. And the other thing is that. The interactions can be far different from what nobody expected. 

If galaxies are in the cosmic plasma bubbles. The energy or wave movement that impacts the plasma bubble causes a situation. The plasma sends energy into that bubble. The bubble focuses energy. Into the middle of the bubble. That forms a standing wave where those energy impulses reflect. The universe is a large place. There can be lots of particles and quasiparticles that cause unexpected reactions. Quasiparticles can act like real particles. And another thing is that radiation, or wave movement. With extremely long wavelengths, they can look like straight waves. 

And those waves can act like thermal pumps. There is a possibility that some wave movement has two wavelengths. Extremely short wavelength. That acts like some kind of snake. That wave movement can act like a thermal pump. Things like energy tornadoes in the energy fields can transport energy. Out of that field. And that forms the situation. That kind of structure in the universe acts like virtual gravity. 

Can the so-called cosmic hum explain something about the nature of dark energy?  

When the Voyager probe crossed the Heliosphere and entered interstellar space, it found the cosmic hum. The radio waves that cannot cross the heliopause. The plasma wave that forms when solar wind impacts particles that come from other stars. There is almost certainly a similar impact wave around the Milky Way galaxy. So there can be wave movements. 

A wavelength that cannot come through that impact wave. That explains why dark energy affects only large-scale structures. That means there can be many types of wave movements that we cannot see. There can be plasma balls around galactic clusters, galactic megaclusters, and even the universe can have some kind of plasma wall in its outer layer. 

This means each of those plasma balls can absorb some wave movement. We always thought that dark energy was one. Homogeneous entirety.  Maybe dark energy has multiple wavelengths. If dark dwarfs destroy dark matter and turn that thing into dark energy, the same thing can happen outside galaxies in cosmic voids that can exist between galaxies. Maybe dark matter particles. The cosmic voids. At a hypothetical level in research, they impact each other. And those impacts send a wave movement. 

When we think about the cosmic voids. And their relationship with things like black holes and dark matter, those voids can rip black holes apart. The same thing can rip visible material in pieces. But if dark matter has only interaction with dark energy and other dark matter particles, there can be a cosmic dark matter void. Those “dark voids” are not dark energy or dark matter. It could be invisible to us. That kind of void can rip dark matter in pieces. 

So when we think about the role of the cosmic voids. In the structures that we know as the Universe, we must ask what made those bubbles. Things like the Boötes void formed when some energy impulse whipped matter and possibly also energy out from that point. The energy impulse caused the shockwave that formed those voids. Or something annihilated material out of the cosmic void. Those cosmic voids can play a bigger role in energy movements. That we have ever imagined. The cosmic void is the thing that could put energy into motion. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/argument-against-theory-of-everything/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C3%B6tes_Void

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

The long-term data storage problem.

  The long-term data storage problem. 

When we think about long-term data storage. That resists electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, and physical damage, we can think about things like films, where data is stored in the form of barcodes. Those barcodes can be stored. In the microfilm, each frame can be protected using armored glass. The computer can read that data using the microfilm reader. If there is a CCD camera mounted in the system. The system can use a projector and the film. That barcode travels through that system. The computer can have a simple operating system that allows it to read those barcodes and then decode that data into the computer. The barcodes can have like two thin lines, which represent zero, and one wide line can represent one. The system can have certain code that tells the end of the program. 

Or code sequence ends. But if the system uses a geometrical form. like squares, triangles, crosses, and circles. That thing makes creating the new type of quantum communication possible. The square can be one, the triangle can be zero, and the circle can be the operator that tells that the code line or program’s code is ended. Basically, those geometrical shapes that the computer reads and transforms into programs can be letters. B can be 1, A can be 0. The system can take any letter group from the alphabet. The system requires marks to separate two zeros and show when the program ends. That makes the data system faster. 

The ability to store data in chemical form can be a game-changing way to store information. But can there be a practical way to make that thing? Sometimes futurologists say that they will store data in the DNA. molecule. And that is one of the most exciting ways to store data. Artificial cells can transmit that data into computers using bioluminescence, which flashes are ones and zeros. Or those artificial cells can send electric impulses to a computer. And that is one way to store information. But there is another way. To make chemical data storage. That doesn’t require the ability to code DNA molecules. 

One way is to use carbon-chloride molecules. Those chroride-carbon chains are flat. And there are  ways to make that thing. 

1) The choride-carbon chain is the one. And the intermediate is zero. Those molecules can be put under the glass. And then the system can read those molecules. The length of the intermediate determines. If there is a zero or a break. 

2) The system can involve two types of molecules. The first molecule is one, and the other one is zero. Those molecules can be stored under the glass plates, and the microscope reads data, which is stored in those molecules. 

3) The system could be faster if there were different molecules that show the zeros and ones. And if there is a molecule that shows the break. Or the endpoint of the code. There should be a separator that determines. When there are two zeros after each other. The system must also be separated. If the power is shut down or if there is only a break when the system waits for a new program. That makes those systems faster, and they don’t require a clock as much as electronic binary systems. 

A simple way to store data is to use images or a series of geometrical images to store and transmit data. The geometrical forms can be 1, 0, beak, and the end of the code line. Chemical and optical ways to transmit data. This is the thing. That makes data transportation safe. The data that is stored in the form of molecules can be transported using protein tapes. 

Hacking as the new and old threats.

   Hacking as the new and old threats. 

There are always suspicions that organized crime uses hackers to steal psychiatric papers to get policemen, prosecutors, and judges fired. Same way. Fake papers can also be a tool that allows people in foreign intelligence to make military forces. To kick off their best commanders. Sensitive information can be used to blackmail even top-level politicians. 

Hackers are people who steal data. Some of that data is harmful, or it contains personal, sensitive information. That kind of data can be a very effective tool if someone wants to destroy someone’s reputation. Hackers can steal data from psychiatric services and try to blackmail politicians. One of those cases was the Vastaamo case, where a hacker stole client information from a psychotherapy company. That hacker also sent a SWAT team to a person’s home and marked one aircraft passenger as a bomb carrier. Hackers can also make things like deactivate the payment cards of their victims. 

Or, in some cases, hackers simply steal money from accounts. If a hacker steals 1 euro. From 10,000 bank accounts. Those victims might not even notice that thing. Or do you follow every euro that is lost from accounts? If there is a loss, let’s say 1 euro, do you call your bank? You should tell that thing. Because in those cases, hackers steal a small sum from many accounts. But are hackers evil people? Some of them are. Some of them enjoy their crimes, and they want to hurt people. 

Being an effective hacker. You don't have to be a computer genius. You must only have access to passwords. One unprotected telephone on the desk gives a hacker access to the entire system. If a telephone is left open on a table, the hacker can call the IT support. And ask for access to the system. If that is some very high-level boss's telephone, that makes it possible to create a super user’s access to the system. That allows an intruder to make new users.  And that allows hackers to expand that operation. 

We can say that all criminals are marginal people. But what makes them marginal people? When some ex-neonazi or MC-gang member wants to get back into society, those people carry the criminal stamp. The rest of their lives. Some people ask, can ex-Nazis or other ex-criminals really regret their actions? If we think like that. Criminals are individuals. That means some of them regret, and some of them don’t. 

We will put those people. Into a marginal position in society.  The rest of their lives. And that raises the risk that those people will commit other crimes. If a person is surrounded by other criminals, they cannot re-integrate into normal life. 

Only jobs. What the ex-inmates can get is some kind of cleaning work. They carry a criminal stamp. The rest of their lives. 

So, are hackers criminals that society created? We can say that some of them have criminal behavior. Because of other people. didn’t accept them for who they are. The media introduces computer hobbyists as some stereotype who is not social. Their place in a mental hospital is the message. Those people face demeaning treatment; they have no girlfriends, because some elder guy wants to show that they are alpha members of some school party. What would you feel if somebody yelled at you, “Get out”? Would that be non-respectful behavior?

What if your workplace treats you as necessary furniture, whose mission is to do jobs? But whose mission is to be otherwise invisible. There are people who just wait to fire those ICT support persons. They show their authority to those people all the time. So, what if your workmates treat you without respect? What if you are always an outsider? Would you want to take revenge? Those kinds of outsiders are excellent targets for a criminal gang recruiter. The hyride threat is that those criminals can cooperate with foreign intelligence services. And they can give a tip for those hostile agents. Maybe they get guns or drugs as payment for cooperation. 

And then we must ask why hackers are what they are. In this case, we must ask why computer hobbyists are what they are. Those people are boring nerds who are not in any way interesting.  Do you know those people? Some of them are people who don’t find any social hobbies. They are people who are lonely because nobody wants to play with them. And the computer is their only friend. Then some criminals come and offer money or women to those people. Some hackers are young, and they don’t understand why some criminals want policemen's home addresses. But then. We must realize. People grow into criminal behavior. 

Maybe the first case that. Those people did it for revenge. It’s easy to steal somebody's passwords. To some system, and then send a message to customs or airport security. When we think of things like professional hackers. Those people work for some criminal organizations or governments. 

Some hackers are made by governments. They can be forced to make those things for the military intelligence. Or some criminal organizations can blackmail them. The fact is, this hacker must not be a qualified programmer. That person must not be an extreme computer genius. If the person gets access to the system is enough. One of the oldest tricks is to play some cleaner and then step into the office. And search for those passwords in the places. Like under keyboards or from computer briefcases. 

The question is always who made the initiative.  Who gave the idea for the hacking operation? Or was it the hacker self, or somebody else? That means some sensitive information can be used as a booster in political games. Psychiatric papers are tools that can offer a possibility to clear the competitor out of the way. That means some people can steal those papers. And some other people are willing to pay for that kind of information.